Validation of mass transfer correlations for CO2 absorption with MEA using pilot data

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 19, Issue , 2013, Pages 478-491

  Razi, Neda ^a   Svendsen, Hallvard F ^a   Bolland, Olav ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Interfacial area correlation; Kinetic model; Large scale; Mass transfer correlation; Pilot plant; Rate based simulation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ETHANOLAMINES; KINETIC PARAMETERS; KINETIC THEORY; PILOT PLANTS; REACTION KINETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

DESIGN AND SIMULATION; INTERFACIAL AREAS; KINETIC MODELING; KINETICS AND MASS TRANSFERS; LARGE-SCALE; LARGE-SCALE APPLICATIONS; MASS TRANSFER CORRELATION; TEMPERATURE PROFILES;

MASS TRANSFER;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CORRELATION; MASS TRANSFER; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

POPULUS;

EID: 84887004620     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. 2-loaded, concentrated aqueous monoethanolamine solutions. Chemical Engineering Science 2003, 58:5195-5210.
2. 2 capture from power plants: Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:37-46.
3. 2 capture using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) solution. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 15:186-199.
4. 2S using aqueous solutions of MEA and DEA. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2001, 185:31-43.
5. Aspen Technology Inc. Aspen Properties Reference Manual October 2006, Aspen Technology Inc., Burlington, MA.
6. Aspen Technology Inc. Aspen Plus User Guide 2008, Aspen Technology Inc., Burlington, MA.
7. 2 Capture Process by MEA using Aspen Plus 2008, Aspen Technology Inc., Burlington, MA.
8. Ataki A., Bart H.J. Experimental and CFD simulation study for the wetting of a structured packing element with liquids. Chemical Engineering & Technology 2006, 29:336-347.
9. Billet R., Schultes M. Predicting mass transfer in packed columns. Chemical Engineering and Technology 1993, 16:1-9.
10. Bravo J.L., Rocha J.A., Fair J.R. A comprehensive model in the performance of columns containing structured packings, distillation and absorption. Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 1992, 128. Institution of Chemical Engineers 1, PA48-A507.
11. Bravo J.L., Rocha J.A., Fair J.R. Mass-transfer in gauze packings. Hydrocarbon Processing 1985, 64:91-95.
12. Brunazzi E., Nardini G., Paglianti A., Petarca L. Interfacial area of Mellapak packing - absorption of 1,1,1-trichloroethane by Genosorb-300. Chemical Engineering and Technology 1995, 18:248-255.
13. Brunazzi E., Paglianti A. Liquid-film mass-transfer coefficient in a column equipped with structured packings. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1997, 36:3792-3799.
14. Cheng S., Meisen A., Chakma A. Predict amine solution properties accurately. Hydrocarbon Processing 1996, 75:81.
15. Dugas R. Carbon Dioxide Absorption, Desorption, and Diffusion in Aqueous Piperazine and Monoethanolamine 2009, The University of Texas, Austin.
16. 2 capture by monoethanolamine - application to CASTOR pilot results. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:103-107.
17. Gualito J.J., Cerino F.J., Cardenas J.C., Rocha J.A. Design method for distillation columns filled with metallic, ceramic, or plastic structured packings. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1997, 36:1747-1757.
18. Hanley B., Chen C.C. New mass-transfer correlations for packed towers. AIChE Journal 2012, 58:132-152.
19. 2. Submitted to Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 2013.
20. Hikita H., Asai S., Ishikawa H., Honda M. The kinetics of reactions of carbon-dioxide with monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine by a rapid mixing method. Chemical Engineering Journal 1977, 13:7-12.
21. Hilliard M.D. A Predictive Thermodynamic Model for an Aqueous Blend of Potassium Carbonate, Piperazine, and Monoethanolamine for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Flue Gas 2008, The University of Texas, Austin.
22. 2 in packed columns for post-combustion carbon capture applications. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2011, 89:1600-1608.
23. Kucka L., Muller I., Kenig E.Y., Gorak A. On the modelling and simulation of sour gas absorption by aqueous amine solutions. Chemical Engineering Science 2003, 58:3571-3578.
24. 2 absorber model aimed for process simulation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 11:11-20.
25. 2 absorption from flue gas by aqueous monoethanolamine. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47:867-875.
26. 2 with primary and secondary-amines in aqueous-solutions. 2. Influence of temperature on zwitterion formation and deprotonation rates. Chemical Engineering Science 1992, 47:2037-2045.
27. Luo X. Experimental and numerical study of carbon dioxide mass transfer and kinetics in amine solutions 2012, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
28. 2 absorption using aqueous monoethanolamine solution. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 6:21-36.
29. 2 capture by reactive absorption: pilot plant description and results of systematic studies with MEA. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 6:84-112.
30. Plaza J.M. Modeling of Carbon Dioxide Absorption using Aqueous Monoethanolamine, Piperazine and Promoted Potassium Carbonate 2011, The University of Texas, Austin.
31. 2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:161-166.
32. 2 absorption into MEA using structured packings. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 9:193-219.
33. 2 capture with MEA. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:1977-1986.
34. Robbins L.A. Improved pressure drop prediction with a new correlation. Chemical Engineering Progress 1991, 87:87-91.
35. Rocha J.A., Bravo J.L., Fair J.R. Distillation columns containing structured packings: a comprehensive model for their performance. 2. Mass-transfer model. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1996, 35:1660-1667.
36. Stichlmair J., Bravo J.L., Fair J.R. General model for prediction of pressure drop and capacity of countercurrent gas/liquid packed columns. Gas Separation & Purification 1989, 3:19-28.
37. Suess P., Spiegel L. Hold-up of Mellapak structured packings. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 1992, 31:119-124.
38. 2. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:533-540.
39. Tsai, R.E., 2010. Mass Transfer Area of Structured Packing. Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Texas at Austin.
40. Tsai R.E., Seibert A.F., Eldridge R.B., Rochelle G.T. A dimensionless model for predicting the mass-transfer area of structured packing. AIChE Journal 2011, 57:1173-1184.
41. Van Os P, P., 2011. CESAR (CO2 Enhanced Separation and Recovery). Final report. Project reference: 213569. http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=proj.document%38PJ_RCN=10244872.
42. 2 and alkanolamines both in aqueous and non-aqueous solutions. An overview. Chemical Engineering Communications 1996, 144:113-158.
43. Weiland R.H., Dingman J.C., Cronin D.B., Browning G.J. Density and viscosity of some partially carbonated aqueous alkanolamine solutions and their blends. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 1998, 43:378-382.
44. Xu Z.P., Afacan A., Chuang K.T. Predicting mass transfer in packed columns containing structured packings. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2000, 78:91-98.
45. 2 Absorption 2011, NTNU, Trondheim.
46. 2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine solution. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2009, 48:9233-9246.
47. 2 absorption in aqueous MEA solution with electrolyte NRTL model. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2011, 311:67-75.