Determinants of percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting: An interprovincial comparison

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1454-1461

  Ouzounian, Maral ^a   Ghali, William ^b   Yip, Alexandra M ^c   Buth, Karen J ^a   Humphries, Karin ^d   Stukel, Therese A ^e   Norris, Colleen M ^f,g   Southern, Danielle A ^b   Galbraith, P Diane ^b   Thompson, Christopher R ^h   Abel, James ^h   Love, Michael P ⁱ   Hassan, Ansar ^c   Hirsch, Gregory M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c SAINT JOHN REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^g MAZANKOWSKI ALBERTA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^h ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ QUEEN ELIZABETH II HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIABETES MELLITUS; DYSLIPIDEMIA; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; CANADA; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SEX DISTRIBUTION; STATE GOVERNMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886947808     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hillis L.D., Smith P.K., Anderson J.L., et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:e123-e210.
2. Kolh P., Wijns W., Danchin N., et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010, 38(suppl):S1-52.
3. Levine G.N., Bates E.R., Blankenship J.C., et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:e44-122.
4. Epstein A.J., Polsky D., Yang F., et al. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008. JAMA 2011, 305:1769-1776.
5. Hannan E.L., Wu C., Chassin M.R. Differences in per capita rates of revascularization and in choice of revascularization procedure for eleven states. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6:35.
6. Ko D.T., Tu J.V., Samadashvili Z., et al. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario. Circulation 2010, 121:2635-2644.
7. Tu J.V., Ko D.T., Guo H., et al. Determinants of variations in coronary revascularization practices. CMAJ 2012, 184:179-186.
8. Hassan A., Newman A., Ko D.T., et al. Increasing rates of angioplasty versus bypass surgery in Canada, 1994-2005. Am Heart J 2010, 160:958-965.
9. Mark D.B., Nelson C.L., Califf R.M., et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1994, 89:2015-2025.
10. Gerber Y., Rihal C.S., Sundt T.M., et al. Coronary revascularization in the community. A population-based study, 1990 to 2004. JAm Coll Cardiol 2007, 50:1223-1229.
11. Mack M.J., Brown P.P., Kugelmass A.D., et al. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 2004, 77:761-766. [discussion: 6-8].
12. Togni M., Balmer F., Pfiffner D., Maier W., Zeiher A.M., Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992-2001. Eur Heart J 2004, 25:1208-1213.
13. Hannan E.L., Racz M.J., Gold J., et al. Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what happens in actual practice?. Circulation 2010, 121:267-275.
14. Frutkin A.D., Lindsey J.B., Mehta S.K., et al. Drug-eluting stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing index revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:614-621.
15. Kim L.J., King S.B., Kent K., et al. Factors related to the selection of surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 2:384-392.
16. Ko D.T., Wang Y., Alter D.A., et al. Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acute myocardial infarction. JAm Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:716-723.
17. Leape L.L., Weissman J.S., Schneider E.C., Piana R.N., Gatsonis C., Epstein A.M. Adherence to practice guidelines: the role of specialty society guidelines. Am Heart J 2003, 145:19-26.
18. Lin G.A., Dudley R.A., Redberg R.F. Cardiologists' use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:1604-1609.
19. Thompson C.R., Humphries K.H., Gao M., et al. Revascularization use and survival outcomes after cardiac catheterization in British Columbia and Alberta. Can J Cardiol 2004, 20:1417-1423.
20. Hannan E.L., Racz M.J., Walford G., et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. NEngl J Med 2005, 352:2174-2183.
21. Malenka D.J., Leavitt B.J., Hearne M.J., et al. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circulation 2005, 112:I371-I376.
22. Serruys P.W., Morice M.C., Kappetein A.P., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. NEngl J Med 2009, 360:961-972.