Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: A US research perspective

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 127-134

  Workman, Thomas ^a   Maurer, Maureen ^a   Carman, Kristin ^a  

^a AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

comparative effectiveness research; consumer engagement; patient engagement; patient participation; public and patient involvement; systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSUMER; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; HUMAN NEEDS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 84886944641     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.13.6     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (2003).
2. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (2009).
3. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010).
4. Coulter A. Patient engagement-what works? J. Ambul. Care Manage. 35(2), 80-89 (2012).
5. Mallery C, Ganachari D, Fernandez J et al. Innovative Methods in Stakeholder Engagement: an Environmental Scan. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA (2012).
6. O'Haire C, Mcpheeters M, Nakamoto N et al. Engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Methods Future Research Needs Reports No. 4. US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, MD, USA, 11-EHC044-EF (2011).
7. Whitlock E, Lopez S, Chang S. AHRQ Series Paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63, 491-501 (2010).
8. Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis S. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff. 29(10), 1834-1841 (2010).
9. Mullins C, Abdulhalim A, Lavallee C. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 307(15), 1587-1588 (2012).
10. Deverka P, Lavallee D, Desai P et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research; defining a framework for effective engagement. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(2), 181-194 (2012).
11. Carman K, Dardess, P, Maurer M et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 32(2), 223-231 (2013).
12. Dipl JK, Punhan M, Schunemann H, Dickersin K. Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. Health Expect. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00722.x (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
13. Handbook of Service User Involvement in Nursing and Healthcare Research. Morrow E, Boaz A, Brearley S, Ross F (Eds). Wiley-Blackwell, London, UK (2012).
14. Sweeney A, Morgan L. The levels and stages of service user/survivor involvement in research. In: Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research. Wallcraft J, Schrank B, Amering M (Eds). Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK (2009).
15. Bar-Cohen A, Sweeney J. Effectively representing the advocate perspective in advisory settings. Presented at: CUE Annual Membership Meeting. Washington, DC, USA, 12 August 2011.
16. Burkholder B, Warren B, Cowley T. How to incorporate consumers, including patients, in guideline development. Presented at: Evidence-based Guidelines Affecting Policy, Practice, and Stakeholders. NY, USA, 10-11 December 2012.
17. Dickerson K, Sakala C, Brawley O. How to reconcile the consumer perspective with the patient advocate perspective. Presented at: Evidence-based Guidelines Affecting Policy, Practice and Stakeholders. NY, USA, 10-11 December 2012.
18. Carman K, Maurer M, Yegian J et al. Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care. Health Aff. 29(7), 1400-1406 (2010).
19. Critical Perspectives on User Involvement. Barnes M, Cotterell P (Eds). Policy Press, Bristol, UK (2011).
20. Krumholz H, Selby J. Seeing through the eyes of patients: the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute funding announcements. Ann. Int. Med. 157(6), 446-447 (2012).
21. Ommaya A, Kupersmith J. Challenges facing the US Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 306(7), 756-757 (2011).
22. Basch E. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 307(15), 1636-1640 (2012).
23. Boutin M. Among other flaws, hypothetical migrane study lacks independent evaluation and patient engagement. Health Aff. 31(10), 2231-2235 (2012).
24. Mullins C, Sanchez R. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction. J. Manage. Care Pharm. 17(9 Suppl. A), S3-S4 (2011).
25. CDC. Principles of Community Engagement (2nd Edition). Government Printing Office, DC, USA, 11-7782 (2011).
26. Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J et al. Sharing data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. com. J. Med. Internet Res. 12(2), e19 (2010).
27. Rubin D. On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research. Stat. Med. 29(19), 1991 (1991).
28. Golub R, Fontanarosa P. Comparative effectiveness research: relative successes. JAMA 307(15), 1643-1645 (2012).
29. Gruman J, Humes-Rovner M, French M et al. From patient education to patient engagement: implications for the field of patient education. Patient Educ. Couns. 78(3), 350-356 (2010).
30. Stevens J, Levine R, Burling A, Russ-Eft D. An Organizational Guide to Building Health Services Research Capacity. US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA, 11(12)-0095-EF (2011).
31. Carman K, Maurer M. Engaging the public on the use of evidence: the role of public deliberation. Presented at: AHRQ Annual Conference. Bethesda, MD, USA, 9-11 September 2012.
32. Pignone M. Challenges to implementing patient-centered research. Annals Intern. Med. 157(6), 450-451 (2012).
33. Timbie J, Schneider E, Busum KV, Fox D. Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice. Health Aff. 31(10), 2168-2175 (2012).
34. Hayes H, Buckland S, Tarpey M. Briefing Notes for Researchers: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh, UK (2012).
35. Barber R, Boote J, Cooper C. Involving consumers succesfully in NHS research: a national survey. Health Expect. 10(4), 380-391 (2007). (Pubitemid 350045740)
36. Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh, UK (2009).
37. Payne J, D'antoine H, France K et al. Collaborating with consumer and community representatives in health and medical research in Australia: results from an evaluation. Health Res. Policy Syst. 9, 18 (2011).