IDEAL in meshes for prolapse, urinary incontinence, and hernia repair

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 502-508

  Gerullis, Holger ^a,b,c   Klosterhalfen, Bernd ^d   Borós, Mihaly ^e   Lammers, Bernhard ^a,c   Eimer, Christoph ^a,c   Georgas, Evagelos ^a,c   Otto, Thomas ^a,b,c  

^a Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^c German Centre for Assessment and Evaluation of Innovative Techniques in Medicine DZITM   (Germany)

^d German Centre for Implant Pathology   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; IDEAL; in vitro; in vivo; mesh; plasma coating; predictability

Indexed keywords

MERSILENE; POLYPROPYLENE; POLYVINYLIDENE FLUORIDE; TRIFLURIDINE;

ALLOGRAFT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD AUTOTRANSFUSION; CELL INFILTRATION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HERNIA; HERNIOPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; LONG TERM CARE; MACROPHAGE; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; OVINE MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PROCEDURES; SHEEP; SURGICAL MESH; THICKNESS; TISSUE INJURY; URINE INCONTINENCE;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; IDEAL; IN VITRO; IN VIVO; MESH; PLASMA COATING; PREDICTABILITY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; FEMALE; INFLAMMATION; MACROPHAGES; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYMERS; SHEEP; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 84886932406     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350612472987     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA safety communication: Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapsed. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm. Accessed December 26, 2012.
2. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA public health notification: Serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. http://www.fda.gov/ medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/publichealthnotifications/ucm061976.htm. Accessed December 26, 2012.
3. Dietz HP, Vancaillie P, Svehla M, Walsh W, Steensma AB, Vancaillie TG. Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materials. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 ; 14: 239-243
4. Afonso JS, Martins PA, Girao MJ, et al. Mechanical properties of polypropylene mesh used in pelvic floor repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 ; 19: 375-380
5. Gerullis H, Georgas E, Eimer C, et al. Evaluation of biocompatibility of alloplastic materials: development of a tissue culture in vitro test system. Surg Technol Int. 2012 ; 21: 366-372
6. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009 ; 374: 1089-1096
7. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009 ; 374: 1097-1104
8. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009 ; 374: 1105-1112
9. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Müller C, et al. Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes - a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg. 2007 ; 31: 234-244
10. Kaupp HA, Matulewicz TJ, Lattimer GL, Kremen JE, Celani VJ. Graft infection or graft reaction?. Arch Surg. 1979 ; 114: 1419-1422
11. Zinther NB, Wara P, Friis-Andersen H. Shrinkage of intraperitoneal onlay mesh in sheep: coated polyester mesh versus covered polypropylene mesh. Hernia. 2010 ; 14: 611-615
12. Ewoldt JM, Anderson DE, Hardy J, Weisbrode SE. Evaluation of a sheep laparoscopic uterine trauma model and repeat laparoscopy for evaluation of adhesion formation and prevention with sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Vet Surg. 2004 ; 33: 668-672
13. Moll HD, Wolfe DF, Schumacher J, Wright JC. Evaluation of sodium carboxymethylcellulose for prevention of adhesions after uterine trauma in ewes. Am J Vet Res. 1992 ; 53: 1454-1456
14. Eimer C, Gerullis H, Wishahi M, et al. Improved biocompatibility of meshes used for hernia incontinence and organ prolapse repair by plasma coating - results of in vitro and in vivo studies. J Urol Suppl. 2011 ; 185: 317
15. McCulloch P. The IDEAL recommendations and urological innovation. World J Urol. 2011 ; 29: 331-336
16. Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, et al. Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 ; 116 (2 pt 1). 293-303
17. Sung VW, Rogers RG, Schaffer JI, et al. Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 ; 112: 1131-1142
18. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 ; 184: 1357-1362
19. Carey M, Higgs P, Goh J, et al. Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2009 ; 116: 1380-1386