Risk factors for late valve-related mortality after aortic valve replacement in elderly patients

Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 368-374

  Hosono, Mitsuharu ^a   Sasaki, Yasuyuki ^a   Hirai, Hidekazu ^a   Sakaguchi, Masanori ^a   Nakahira, Atsushi ^a   Morisaki, Akimasa ^a   Suehiro, Shigefumi ^a  

^a OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Elderly patients; Left ventricular mass

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84886874359     PISSN: 13411098     EISSN: 21861005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.01983     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lund O. Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation 1990; 82: 124-139.
2. Logeais Y, Langanay T, Roussin R, et al. Surgery for aortic stenosis in elderly patients. A study of surgical risk and predictive factors. Circulation 1994; 90: 2891-2898.
3. Akins CW, Daggett WM, Vlahakes GJ, et al. Cardiac operations in patients 80 years old and older. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 606-14; discussion 614-615.
4. Kvidal P, Bergström R, Hörte LG, et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 747-756.
5. Lund O, Flø C, Jensen FT, et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in aortic stenosis. Prognostic value after valve replacement and underlying mechanisms. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1977-1987.
6. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Schaff HV, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation 2000; 101: 1940-1946.
7. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, et al. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation 1997; 95: 2395-2400.
8. Alexander KP, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 731-738.
9. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613-618.
10. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1490-1495.
11. Fuster RG, Argudo JA, Albarova OG, et al. Left ventricular mass index in aortic valve surgery: a new index for early valve replacement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23: 696-702.
12. Mehta RH, Bruckman D, Das S, et al. Implications of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 919-928.
13. Monrad ES, Hess OM, Murakami T, et al. Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1988; 77: 1345-1355.
14. Taniguchi K, Kawamaoto T, Kuki S, et al. Left ventricular myocardial remodeling and contractile state in chronic aortic regurgitation. Clin Cardiol 2000; 23: 608-614.
15. Taketani S, Sawa Y, Taniguchi K, et al. C-Myc expression and its role in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Circulation 1997; 96 (9 Suppl): II83-II87; discussion II87-9.
16. Levy F, Garayalde E, Quere JP, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative atrial fibrillation in patients with aortic stenosis and low ejection fraction having aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 809-811.
17. Levy F, Laurent M, Monin JL, et al. Aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis operative risk stratification and long-term outcome: a European multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1466-1472.
18. Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, et al. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007; 115: 2856-2864.
19. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P, Carabello B. Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 281-289.
20. Schuppan D, Afdhal NH. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 2008; 371: 838-851.
21. Møller S, Henriksen JH. Cardiovascular complications of cirrhosis. Postgrad Med J 2009; 85: 44-54.
22. Bech-Hanssen O, Caidahl K, Wall B, et al. Influence of aortic valve replacement, prosthesis type, and size on functional outcome and ventricular mass in patients with aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 57-65.
23. González-Juanatey JR, García-Acuña JM, Vega Fernandez M, et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 273-280.