Models for the Calculation of Sun Protection Factors and Parameters Characterizing the UVA Protection Ability of Cosmetic Sunscreens

Colloids in Cosmetics and Personal Care

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 275-308

  Herzog, Bernd ^a  

^a CIBA GEIGY LTD   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cosmetic sunscreens; Distribution of UV extinction; Film irregularities; Oil phases; Overall UV spectrum; Photoinstabilities; Sun protection factors; Sunscreen agent; UVA protection ability; Water phases

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886805333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9783527631131.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Motoyoshi K, Ota Y, Takuma Y, Takenouchi M, Wrinkles from UVA exposure. Cosmet. Toiletries 1998; 113: 51-58.
2. Scharfetter K, Wlaschek M, Hogg A, Bolsen K, Schothorst A, Goerz G, Plewig G, UVA irradiation induces collagenase in human fibroblasts in vitro and in vivo. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1991; 283: 506-511.
3. Lavker R, Kaidbey K, The spectral dependence for UVA induced cumulative damage in human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1997; 108: 17-21.
4. Seité S, Moyal D, Verdie MP, Hourseau C, Fourtanier A, Accumulated p53 protein and UVA protection level of sunscreens. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2000; 16: 3-9.
5. Schulze R, Einige Versuche und Bemerkungen zum Problem der handelsüblichen Lichtschutzmittel. Parfüm. Kosmet. 1956; 37: 6, 7, 310-315, 365-372.
6. Ferguson J, Brown M, Alert D, Bielfeldt S, Brown J, Chardon A, Hourseau C, Mazilier C, Cuthbert J, Arcy-Burt D, Jolley J, Murdoch M, Finkel P, Masson P, Merot F, Maclennon A, Poret J, Siladji S, Collaborative development of a sun protection factor test method, a proposed European Standard. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 1996; 18: 203-218; COLIPA, COLIPA Sun Protection Factor Test Method, Ref. 94/289. European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association-COLIPA, Brussels, 1994.
7. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, US FDA, Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human drugs; proposed safety, effective and labeling conditions. Fed. Regist. 1978; 43/166: 38206-38269.
8. Japan Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA), Standard SPF Test Method. JCIA, Tokyo, 1991.
9. Diffey BL, Robson J, A new substrate to measure sunscreen protection factors throughout the ultraviolet spectrum. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1989; 40: 127-133.
10. Reece BT, Deeds D, Rozen M, An in vitro method for screening sunscreen formulations for sun protection factor using a full-thickness skin model. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1992; 43: 307-312.
11. Tronnier H, Kockott D, Meick B, Hani N, Heinrich U, Zur In Vitro-Bestimmung des SPF. Parfüm. Kosmet. 1996; 77: 326-329.
12. Springsteen A, Yurek R, Frazier M, Carr KF, In vitro measurement of sun protection factor of sunscreens by diffuse transmittance. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999; 380: 155-164.
13. Chardon A, Moyal D, Hourseau C, Persistent pigment-darkening response as a method for evaluation of ultraviolet A protection assays. In Sunscreens, Development, Evaluation and Regulatory Aspects, 2nd edn., Lowe, NJ, Shaath, NA, Pathak, MA (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997, pp. 559-582.
14. AS/NZS, Australian/New Zealand Standard, AS/NZS 2604, 1998.
15. Diffey BL, A method for broad spectrum classification of sunscreens. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 1994; 16: 47-52.
16. Wendel V, Klette E, Wittern KP, Gers-Barlag H, Measurement of UVA protection. SÖFW J. 2002; 128: 34-38.
17. DIN. Characterization of UVA Protection of Dermal Suncare Products by Measuring the Transmittance with Regard to the Sun Protection Factor. DIN 67502. Normenausschuss Lichttechnik (FNL) at DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin, 2004.
18. COLIPA, COLIPA Method for the In Vitro Determination of UVA Protection Provided by Sunscreen Products. European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association-COLIPA, Brussels, 2007.
19. Sayre RM, Agin PP, LeVee GJ, Marlowe E, A comparison of in vivo and in vitro testing of sunscreening formulas. Photochem. Photobiol. 1979; 29: 559-566.
20. McKinlay AF, Diffey BL, A reference action spectrum for ultraviolet-induced erythema in human skin. CIE J. 1987; 6: 17-22.
21. Sellers RL, Carpenter FG, An instrument for in vitro determinations of SPF. Cosmet. Toiletries 1992; 107: 119-122.
22. Ferrero L, Pissavini M, Dehais A, Marguerie S, Zastrow L, Importance of substrate roughness for in vitro sun protection assessment. IFSCC Mag. 2006; 9: 97-108.
23. Herzog B, Prediction of sun protection factors by calculation of transmissions with a calibrated step film model. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2002; 53: 11-26.
24. Industrieverband Körperpflege und Waschmittel, Die Methode zur Bestimmung des Lichtschutzfaktors. Industrieverband Körperpflege und Waschmittel, Frankfurt/Main, 1995.
25. Ferrero L, Orcet AM, Zastrow L, The effective film thickness of sun products-how is it calculated? In Proceedings of the 19th IFSCC Congress, Sydney, 1996.
26. O'Neill JJ, Effect of film irregularities on sunscreen efficacy. J. Pharm. Sci. 1984; 73: 888-891.
27. Tunstall DF, A mathematical approach for the analysis of in vitro sun protection factor measurements. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2000; 51: 303-315.
28. Hewitt JP, Integrating theory and practice in suncare formulations. Layer thickness models for inorganic susnscreens. InProceedings of the 24th IFSCC Congress, Osaka, 2006.
29. Herzog B, Prediction of sun protection factors and UV-A Parameters by calculation of UV transmissions through sunscreen films of inhomogeneous surface structure. In Sunscreens-Regulation and Commercial Development, 3rd edn., Shaath N (ed.), Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
30. Herzog B, Müller S, Neuenschwander A, Deshayes C, Acker S, Osterwalder U, Improved simulation of sun protection factors and UVA-parameters-a useful tool for the development of sunscreen formulations. In Proceedings of the 24th IFSCC Congress, Osaka, 2006.
31. Thomas RT, Rough Surfaces, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, London, 1998, pp. 91-104.
32. Abbott EP, Firestone FA, Specifying surface quality. Mech. Engng. 1933; 55: 569-572.
33. Ferrero L, Pissavini M, Marguerie S, Zastrow L, Efficiency of a continuous height distribution model of sunscreen film geometry to predict a realistic sun protection factor. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2003; 54: 463-481.
34. Pissavini M, Ferrero L, Alard V, Heinrich U, Tronnier H, Kockott D, Lutz D, Tournier V, Zambonin M, Meloni M, Determination of the in vitro SPF. Cosmet. Toiletries 2003; 118: 63-71.
35. Japan Cosmetic Industry Association, JCIA Measurement Standard for UVA Protection Efficacy. JCIA, Tokyo, 1995, p. 105.
36. Wloka M, Lange RFM, Flösser-Müller H, An in vitro SPF screening approach considering the photostability of the UV Filters. In Proceedings of International Sun Protection Conference, London, 2005.
37. Herzog B, Sommer K, Investigations on photostability of UV-absorbers for cosmetic sunscreens. In Proceedings of the 21st IFSCC Congress, Berlin, 2000.
38. Herzog B, Mongiat S, Quass K, Deshayes C, Prediction of sun protection factors and UVA parameters by using a calibrated step film model. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004; 93: 1780-1795.
39. Neuenschwander A, For the prediction of sun protection factors-comparison of in vitro measurements and model calculations. Diploma Thesis, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, 2005.
40. AS/NZS, Australian/New Zealand Standard, AS/NZS 2604, 1998.
41. Ferrero L, Orcet AM, Zastrow L, Spectroscopy of sunscreen products. How to explain the special shape of UV curves obtained from in vitro SPF tests. In Proceedings of the 20th IFSCC Congress, Cannes, 1998.
42. Herzog B, Mongiat S, Deshayes C, Neuhaus M, Sommer K, Mantler A, In vivo and in vitro assessment of UVA protection by sunscreen formulations containinmg either butyl methoxy dibenzoyl methane, methylene bisbenzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol or microfine ZnO.Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2002; 24: 170-185.
43. DGK Task Force ''Sun Protection'', The reproducibility of an in vitro determination of the UVA index describing the relative UVA protection of sun care products. IFSCC Mag. 2002; 5: 161-166.
44. Chardon A, Moyal D, Hourseau C, Persistent pigment-darkening response as a method for evaluation of ultraviolet A protection assays. In Sunscreens, Development, Evaluation and Regulatory Aspects, 2nd edn., Lowe NJ, Shaath NA, Pathak MA (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997, pp. 559-582.
45. Cesarini JP, personal communication.
46. Moyal D, Wichrowski K, Tricaud C, In vivo persistent pigment darkening method, a demonstration of the reproducibility of the UV-A protection factors results at several testing laboratories. Photoderm. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2006; 22: 124-128.
47. Wendel V, Klette E, Gers-Barlag H, A new in vitro test method to assess the UVA protection performance of sun care products. SÖFW J. 2001; 127: 12-15.
48. Gers-Barlag H, Harmonized in vitro determination of UVAUV-A protection. In Proceedings of International Sun Protection Conference, London, 2005.
49. Ferrero L, Protection UVAUV-A, methodes in-vitro. In Actualités et Futur de la Photoprotection, Conference SFC, Paris, 2005.
50. Giesinger J, Eine neue, in vivo kalibrierbare Methode zur Bestimmung des Photoabbaus kosmetischer UV-Filter. Techniker-Arbeit. Carl Engler Schule, Karlsruhe, 2006.
51. Ferrero L, Pissavini M, Dehais A, Marguerie S, Zastrow L, Importance of substrate microrelief for in vitro sun protection assessment of non photostable sunscreen products. In Proceedings of the 24th IFSCC Congress, Osaka, 2006.
52. Herzog B, Müller S, Sohn M, Osterwalder U, New insight and prediction of photostability of sunscreens. In Proceedings of Cosmetics Science Conference, Paris, 2007.
53. European Commission, Recommendation on the efficacy of sunscreen products and the claims made relating thereto. Off. J. 2006; L265: 2006/7647/EC; 49: 39-43.
54. Lademann J, Rudolph A, Jacbi U, Weigmann HJ, Schaefer H, Sterry W, Influence of nonhomogeneous distribution of topically applied UV filters on sun protection factors. J. Biomed. Opt. 2004; 9: 1358-1362.