Surface modification of polyurethane towards promoting the ex vivo cytocompatibility and in vivo biocompatibility for hypopharyngeal tissue engineering

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 607-616

  Shen, Zhisen ^a   Kang, Cheng ^a   Chen, Jingjing ^a   Ye, Dong ^a   Qiu, Shijie ^a   Guo, Shanshan ^a   Zhu, Yabin ^a  

^a NINGBO UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

human hypopharyngeal fibroblast; human hypopharyngeal skeletal muscle cells; hypopharynx tissue engineering; polyurethane; Protein grafting

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; DYNAMIC CONTACT ANGLE; FLUORESCENCE DETECTION; GLUTARALDEHYDE CROSS-LINKING; HYPOPHARYNX; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; PROTEIN GRAFTING; SKELETAL MUSCLE CELLS;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; CELL CULTURE; CROSSLINKING; ESTERIFICATION; FIBROBLASTS; POLYURETHANES; PROTEINS; RAT CONTROL; SUBSTRATES; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ESTERS;

POLYURETHAN; RHODAMINE B; SILK FIBROIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACK; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; EX VIVO STUDY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; HYPOPHARYNX; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANTATION; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

HUMAN HYPOPHARYNGEAL FIBROBLAST; HUMAN HYPOPHARYNGEAL SKELETAL MUSCLE CELLS; HYPOPHARYNX TISSUE ENGINEERING; POLYURETHANE; PROTEIN GRAFTING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; HYPOPHARYNX; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84886788568     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328212468184     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yu P, Lewin JS, Reece GP, et al. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes and hospital costs following pharyngoessophageal reconstruction with the antherolateral thigh free flap versus the jujunal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 ; 117: 968-974
2. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993 ; 260: 920-926
3. Koichi O, Yasuhiro T, Teruhisa S, et al. Clinical application of in situ tissue engineering using a scaffolding technique for reconstruction of the larync and trachea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 ; 117: 673-678
4. Jiang X, Gu J, Lin L, et al. Investigation on the modification to polyurethane by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Pigment Resin Technol. 2011 ; 40: 240-246
5. Ueda M, Alferiev IS, Simons SB, et al. CD47-dependent molecular mechanisms of blood outgrowth endothelial cell attachment on cholesterol-modified polyurethane. Biomaterials. 2010 ; 31: 6394-6399
6. Ko YG, Kim YH, Park KD, et al. Immobilization of poly(ethylene glycol) or its sulfonate onto polymer surfaces by ozone oxidation. Biomaterials. 2001 ; 22: 2115-2123
7. Guan JJ, Gao CY, Feng LX, et al. Functionalizing of polyurethane surfaces by photografting with hydrophilic monomers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2000 ; 77: 2505-2512
8. Schakenraad JM, Arends J, Busscher HJ. Kinetics of cell spreading on protein precoated substrata: a study of interfacial aspects. Biomaterials. 1989 ; 10: 43-50
9. Saxena AK, Ainoedhofer H, Hollwarth ME. Culture of ovine esophageal epithelial cells and in vitro esophagus tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010 ; 16: 109-114
10. Petrini P, Parolari C, Tanzi MC. Silk fibroin-polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001 ; 12: 849-853
11. Chu PY, Chang SY. Reconstruction of circumferential pharyngoesophageal defects with laryngotracheal flap and pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Head Neck. 2002 ; 24: 933-939
12. Stock UA, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering current state and prospects. Ann Rev Med. 2001 ; 52: 43-51
13. Charles A, Vacanti JP. The history of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Rev Ser. 2006 ; 10: 569-576
14. Xu XX, Yu YP, Yang LQ. The progress in research on silk fibroin blend membranes. Adv Mater Res. 2011 ; 311-313: 2052-2058
15. Dal Prà I, Petrini P, Charini A, et al. Silk fibroin-coated three-dimensional polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering: interactions with normal human fibroblasts. Tissue Eng. 2003 ; 9 (6). 1113-1121
16. Chiarini A, Petrini P, Bozzini S, et al. Silk fibroin/poly(carbonate)- urethane as substrate for cell growth:in vitro interactions with human cells. Biomaterials. 2003 ; 24: 789-799
17. Zhu YB, Gao CY, Liu XY, et al. Surface modification of polycaprolactone membrane via aminolysis and biomacromolecule immobilization for promoting cytocompatibility of human endothelial cells. Biomacromolecules. 2002 ; 3: 1312-1319
18. Zhu YB, Gao CY, Liu YX, et al. Surface modification of polycaprolactone membrane via aminolysis and biomacromolecule immobilization for promoting cytocompatibility of human endothelial cells. Biomacromolecules. 2002 ; 3 (6). 1312-1319
19. Zhu YB, Gao CY, Liu YX, et al. Immobilization of biomacromolecules onto aminolyzed poly(L-lactic acid) towards acceleration of endothelium regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2004 ; 10: 53-61
20. Zhu YB, Gao CY, He T, et al. Endothelium regeneration on luminal surface of polyurethane vascular scaffold modified with diamine and covalently grafted with gelatin. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25 (3). 423-430
21. Zhu YB, Gao CY, Liu YX, et al. Endothelial cell functions in vitro cultured on poly(L-lactic acid) membranes modified with different methods. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004 ; 69 A (3). 436-443
22. Zhu YB, Sun Y. The influence of polyelectrolyte charges of polyurethane membrane surface on the growth of human endothelial cells. Colloid Surf B: Biointerf. 2004 ; 36: 49-55
23. Labrow RS, Erfle DJ, Santerre JP. Elastase-induced hydrolysis of synthetic solid substrates: poly(ester-urea-urethane) and poly(ether-urea- urethane). Biomaterials. 1996 ; 17: 2381-2388
24. Santerre JP, Labrow RS. The effect of hard segment size on the hydrolytic stability of polyether-urea-urethanes when exposed to cholesterol esterase. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 ; 36: 223-232
25. Howard GT. Biodegradation of polyurethane: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2002 ; 49: 245-252