World wide views on global warming: Evaluation of a public debate

Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Ethical Perspectives on Land Use and Food Production

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 95-99

  Bovenkerk, B ^a   Brom, F W A ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complex problems; Public debate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886718327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. Bovenkerk, B. (2009). Evaluating Participatory Methods. In: Millar, K., Hobson West, P. and Nerlich, B. (eds.) Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 305-309.
2. Fishkin, J. and Luskin, R. (2005), Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica 40:284-298.
3. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for a post-normal age. Futures 25:739-55.
4. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Regh. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Hisschemöller, M. and Hoppe, R. (1995). Coping with Intractable Controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 8:40-60.
6. Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree about Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
7. Wynne, B. (2003). Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002). Social Studies of Science 33:401-17.