Beyond illumination: An interactive simulation framework for nonvisual and perceptual aspects of daylighting performance

Proceedings of BS 2013: 13th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2749-2756

  Andersen, Marilyne ^a   Guillemin, Antoine ^a   Amundadottir, Maria L ^a   Rockcastle, Siobhan ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS; INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE ASPECTS; RADIANCE CALCULATIONS; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; SIMULATION STRUCTURE; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL; VISUALIZATION PLATFORMS;

LIGHT; VISUALIZATION;

DAYLIGHTING;

EID: 84886712464     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Amundadottir M, St Hilaire M, Lockley SW, Andersen M. 2013a. Modeling non-visual responses to light: unifying spectral sensitivity and temporal characteristics in a single model structure. CIE Conf, Paris.
2. Amundadottir M, Lockley SW, Andersen M. 2013b. Simulation-based evaluation of non-visual responses to light: proof-of-concept study of healthcare redesign, BS 2013, Chambéry.
3. Andersen M, et al. 2008. An intuitive daylighting performance analysis and optimization approach, Building Research & Information 36(6): 593-607.
4. Andersen M, Gagne JML, Kleindienst S. (submitted). Interactive expert support for early stage full-year daylighting design: A user's perspective on Lightsolve, Automation in Construction.
5. Andersen M, Mardaljevic J, and Lockley S. W. 2012. A framework for predicting the non-visual effects of daylight - Part I: photobiology-based model. Lighting Research & Technology 44(1):37-53.
6. Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. 2002. Photo-transduction by Retinal Ganglion Cells That Set the Circadian Clock. Science 295:1070- 1073.
7. Cajochen C et al. 2000. Dose-response relationship for light intensity and ocular and electroencephalographic correlates of human alertness. Behavioral Brain Research 115(1):75-83.
8. Chang A-MM, et al. 2012. Human responses to bright light of different durations. The Journal of physiology, 590(13):3103-3112.
9. Cetegen D, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, 2008. View Size and Office Illuminance Effects on Employee Satisfaction. Proc. Balkan Light, Ljubljana.
10. Gagne JML, Andersen M, Norford LK. 2011. An Interactive Expert System for Daylighting Design Exploration, Build & Env 46(11).
11. Gochenour, S. J. and Andersen, M. 2009. Circadian Effects of Daylighting in a Residential Environment. In Proc LuxEuropa 2009, Istambul.
12. Gooley JJ et al. 2010. Spectral Responses of the Human Circadian System Depend on the Irradiance and Duration of Exposure to Light. Science Translational Medicine, 2(31-33).
13. Gronfier C et al. 2004. Efficacy of a single sequence of intermittent bright light pulses for de-laying circadian phase in humans. Amer. J. Physiology - Endocrin. & Metabolism, 287(1):E174-E181.
14. IEA. 2008. Testing and Validation of Building Energy Simulation Tools, International Energy Agency Technical Report SHC Task 34.
15. Jewett ME, Kronauerm RE. 1999. Interactive mathematical models of subjective alertness and cognitive throughput in humans. Journal of biological rhythms, 14(6):588-597.
16. Kleindienst S, Bodart M, Andersen M. 2008. Graphical Representation of Climate-Based Daylight Performance to support architectural design, Leukos 5(1).
17. Kleindienst S., Andersen M. 2012. Comprehensive Annual Daylight Design through a Goal-Based Approach, Build. Res. & Info. 40(2): 154-173.
18. Lockley SW. 2009. Circadian Rhythms: Influence of Light in Humans, 971-988. Acad. Press, Oxford.
19. Mardaljevic J, Heschong L, Lee E. 2009. Daylight metrics and energy savings, Lighting Research and Technology 41(3): 261-283.
20. Münch M et al. 2012. Effects of prior light exposure on early evening performance, subjective sleepiness, and hormonal secretion. Behavioral neuroscience, 126(1):196-203.
21. Nasman JD, Cutler B. 2011. Evaluation of a tangible interface for architectural daylighting analysis, i3D:207-ACM SIGGRAPH.
22. Newsham GR, Richardson C, Blanchet C, Veitch JA., 2005. Lighting Quality Research Using Rendered Images of Offices. Light Res Techn 37 (2): 93-115.
23. Ochoa C., Capeluto I. 2009. Advice tool for early design stages of intelligent façades based on energy and visual comfort approach, Energy & Buildings 41(5).
24. Parpairi K et al. 2002. The Luminance Differences index: A new indicator of user preferences in daylit spaces, Lighting Research & Technology 34.
25. Paule B., Flourentzou F., Pantet S., Boutillier J. 2011. DIAL+suite [...], Proc. of CISBAT, Lausanne.
26. Pechacek CS, Andersen M, Lockley SW. 2008. Preliminary Method for Prospective Analysis of the Circadian Efficacy of (Day)Light[...] Leukos 5(1).
27. Rockcastle S, Andersen M. 2012. Dynamic Annual Metrics for Contrast in Daylit Architecture, In Proc. SimAUD 2012, Orlando.
28. Viola AU et al. 2008. Blue-enriched white light in the work- place improves self-reported alertness, performance and sleep quality. Scandinavian J. of work, environment & health, 34(4):297-306.
29. Webb A. 2006. Considerations for lighting in the built environment: Non-visual effects of light. Energy and Buildings, 38(7):721-727.
30. Wienold J. 2009. Dynamic daylight glare evaluation, In Proc. of IBPSA 2009 Conference, Glasgow, UK.
31. Wymelenberg K, Inanici M. 2009. A Study of Luminance Distribution Patterns and Occupant Preference in Daylit Offices, PLEA 2009, Quebec City.
32. Zeitzer JM, Dijk D-J, Kronauer RE, Brown EN, Czeisler CA. 2000. Sensitivity of the human circadian pacemaker to nocturnal light: melatonin phase resetting and suppression. J Physiol 526(3).