Integration challenges of clinical information systems developed without a shared data dictionary

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 1053-1057

  Hicken, Val N ^a,b   Thornton, Sidney N ^a,b   Rocha, Roberto A ^a,b  

^a INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

common data elements; data model reconciliation; data quality; EHR systems standardization; information management; longitudinal computerized medical records systems; ontology development; Systems integration; terminologies

Indexed keywords

DATA INTEGRATION; INTEGRATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LEGACY SYSTEMS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TERMINOLOGY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; STANDARDIZATION;

COMMON DATUM; COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL RECORDS; DATA QUALITY; EHR SYSTEMS; MODEL RECONCILIATION; ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; COMMON DATA ELEMENT; COMPUTERISED MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS; DATA ELEMENTS; DATA MODEL RECONCILIATION; EHR SYSTEM STANDARDIZATION; LONGITUDINAL COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEM; SYSTEM INTEGRATION; SYSTEM STANDARDIZATION;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LEGACY SYSTEMS;

ADULT; COMMON DATA ELEMENTS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA QUALITY; DATA SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NOMENCLATURE; ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 84886695352     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-1053     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Clayton PD, Narus SP, Huff SM, Pryor TA, Haug PJ, Lar-kin T, et al. Building a comprehensive clinical information system from components. The approach at Intermountain Health Care. Methods Inf Med 2003;42(1): 1-7.
2. Twede M, Gardner R, Hebertson R. A PC-based system for intrapartum monitoring. Contemporary OB/GYN 1984(Special Issue-Technology 1985):24:13-17.
3. 3M HIS. Making Sense of the Data: Using a Medical Data Dictionary to Integrate, Share, and Understand Clinical Data. White Paper. Salt Lake City, Utah: 3M Health Information Systems; 2002.
4. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety, and B.o.H.C. Services, Key capabilities of an electronic health record system: letter report. 2003, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
5. Rosenal TW, Forsythe DE, Musen MA, Seiver A. Support for information management in critical care: a new approach to identify needs. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995:2-6.
6. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Improving the Patient Record., Dick RS, Steen EB. The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1991.
7. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
8. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Knaus WA, Duffy J. The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference? Med Care 1994;32(5):508-25.
9. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927, Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG),; 2002.
10. Simpson KR, Creehan PA, (AWHONN) AoWsHOaNN. Perinatal Nursing. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
11. Williams S. Vice President Education, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG),. Interview by author, 2 July 2003, Washington D.C.
12. Kogan MD. Director of Office of Data and Information Management, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), Health and Human Services (HHS). Interview by author, 11 July 2003, Rockville MD
13. Maloni JA, Cheng CY, Liebl CP, Maier JS. Transforming prenatal care: reflections on the past and present with implications for the future. Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1996;25(1): 17-23.
14. Stead WW, Miller RA, Musen MA, Hersh WR. Integration and beyond: panel discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7(2): 146-8.
15. De Keizer NF, Abu-Hanna A, Zwetsloot-Schonk JH. Understanding terminological systems. I: Terminology and typology. Methods InfMed 2000;39(1):16-21.
16. Heard S, Beale T, Freriks G, Mori AR, Pishev O. Templates and Archetypes: how do we know what we are talking about?: HL7; 2003 2/12/2003.
17. Health Level Seven I. HL7 Data Model Development. See http://www.hl7.org/; 2004.