Potentials of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for preoperative local staging of colon cancer

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 722-730

  Rollvén, Erik ^a,b   Holm, Torbjorn ^a,b   Glimelius, Bengt ^b,c   Lörinc, Esther ^a,b   Blomqvist, Lennart ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Computed tomography; High resolution mri; Histopathology; Neoadjuvant treatment; Staging

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; SURGERY; TUMORS;

COLON CANCER; HIGH RESOLUTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT; STAGING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; COLON CANCER; COLON TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION MRI; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STAGING; VERY ELDERLY;

COLON CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HIGH RESOLUTION MRI; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT; STAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84886608693     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0284185113484018     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. UK National Cancer Research Institute's Colorectal Cancer Clinical Studies Group. FOxTROT: A randomised trial assessing whether preoperative chemotherapy and/or an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody improve outcome in high-risk operable colon cancer, Protocol - Version 4.0 2008. See http://www.foxtrot.bham.ac.uk/FOxTROT.
2. Group MS. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 2006;333:779.
3. Group MS. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study. Radiology 2007;243:132-9.
4. Burton S, Brown G, Bees N, et al. Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancer. Br J Radiol 2008;81:10-9.
5. Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y, et al. Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2007;96:1030-6.
6. Charnsangavej C, Dubrow RA, Varma DG, et al. CT of the mesocolon. Part 2. Pathologic considerations. Radiographics 1993;13:1309-22.
7. Charnsangavej C, DuBrow RA, Varma DG, et al. CT of the mesocolon. Part 1. Anatomic considerations. Radiographics 1993;13:1035-45.
8. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation- Technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:354-64; discussion 64-5.
9. Sobin LH. TNM, sixth edition: new developments in general concepts and rules. Semin Surg Oncol 2003;21:19-22.
10. Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Weber K. Lymphadenectomy with tumors of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Chirurg 2007;78:217-25.
11. Leufkens AM, van den Bosch MA, van Leeuwen MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography for colon cancer staging: A systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011;46:887-94.
12. Hennedige T, Teo L, Ang B, et al. Accuracy of preoperative CT for local staging in colorectal carcinomas. Singapore Med J 2010;51:475-80.
13. Smith NJ, Barbachano Y, Norman AR, et al. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2008;95:229-36.
14. Tuna S, Dalkilic Calis M, et al. Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio for survival in colon cancer. J BUON 2011;16:478-85.