Integrating privacy and ethical impact assessments

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 755-766

  Wright, David ^a   Friedewald, Michael ^b  

^a Trilateral Research and Consulting   (United Kingdom)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data protection reform; Emerging technologies; Ethics; Impact assessment; privacy

Indexed keywords

DATA MANAGEMENT; ETHICS; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84886595184     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct083     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Asveld, L. and Roeser, S. (2009) The Ethics of Technological Risk. London: Earthscan.
2. Böhle, K., Coenen, C., Decker, M. and Rader, M. (2013) 'Biocybernetic adaptation and privacy', Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26: 71-80.
3. Cabinet Office. (2008a) 'Data Handling Procedures in Government: Final Report'. London: Cabinet Office, accessed XX XXXXXXX XXXX.
4. Cabinet Office. (2008b) 'Cross Government Actions: Mandatory Minimum Measures'. London: Cabinet Office, accessed 08 November 2013.
5. Clarke, R. (2009) 'Privacy impact assessment: Its origins and development', Computer Law & Security Review, 25: 123-35.
6. Clarke, R. (2012) 'PIAs in Australia: A Work-in-Progress Report'. In: Wright, D. and De Hert, P. (eds) Privacy Impact Assessment, pp. 119-48. Berlin: Springer.
7. CNIL (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Liberté s). (2012) 'Methodology for Privacy Risk Assessment: How to implement the Data Protection Act'. Paris: CNIL, accessed 08 November 2013.
8. EC (European Commission). (2012) 'Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (General Data Protection Regulation)', COM(2012) 11 final. Brussels: European Commission.
9. EGE (European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission). (2012) 'Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies', Opinion No. 26. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
10. Finn, R. L., Wright, D. and Friedewald, M. (2013) 'Seven types of privacy'. In: Gutwith, S. et al. (eds) European Data Protection: Coming of Age, pp. 3-32. Berlin: Springer.
11. Finn, R. L., Friedewald, M., Gellert, R., Gutwirth, S. et al. (2011) 'Privacy, data protection and ethical issues in new and emerging technologies: Five case studies'. PRESCIENT Project, Deliverable 2 accessed 08 November 2013.
12. Gutwirth, S., Gellert, R., Bellanova, R., Friedewald, M. et al. (2011) 'Legal, social, economic and ethical conceptualisations of privacy and data protection'. PRESCIENT Project, Deliverable 1 accessed 08 November 2013.
13. Hallinan, D., Schü tz, P., Friedewald, M., De Hert, P. et al. (2014) 'Neurodata and data protection: Should we be mindful of data of the mind?', Surveillance and Society, 12: Forthcoming.
14. Harris, I., Jennings, R. C., Pullinger, D., Rogerson, S. and Duquenoy, P. (2011) 'Assessment of new technologies: A meta-methodology', Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 9: 49-64.
15. HIQA (Health Information and Quality Authority). (2010a) 'International Review of Privacy Impact Assessments'. Cork, Ireland: HIQA, accessed 08 November 2013.
16. HIQA (Health Information and Quality Authority). (2010b) 'Guidance on Privacy Impact Assessment in Health and Social Care'. Dublin: HIQA, accessed XX XXXXXXX XXXX.
17. ICO (Information Commissioner's Office). (2009) 'Privacy Impact Assessment Handbook. Version 2.0'. Wilmslow, UK: UK Information Commissioner's Office, accessed 08 November 2013.
18. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2011) 'Information Technology - Security Techniques - Information Security Risk Management' ISO/IEC 27005:2011. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
19. Kenneally, E., Bailey, M. and Maughan, D. (2010) 'A framework for understanding and applying ethical principles in network and security research', in Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2010 Workshops, RLCPS, WECSR, and WLC 2010, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, January 25-8, 2010, Revised Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6054), R. Sion, R. Curtmola, S. Dietrich and A. Kiayias (eds), pp. 240-46. Berlin: Springer.
20. OAIC (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner). (2010) 'Privacy Impact Assessment Guide'. Sydney: OAIC, accessed 08 November 2013.
21. OIPC (Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta). (2009) 'Privacy Impact Assessment Requirements', Edmonton, Canada: OIPC, accessed 08 November 2013.
22. OMB (Office of Management and Budget). (2003) 'OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the EGovernment Act of 2002', Washington, DC, accessed 08 November 2013.
23. OPC (Office of the Privacy Commissioner). (2007) 'Privacy Impact Assessment Handbook', Wellington, New Zealand, accessed 08 November 2013.
24. OSHCR (Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights). (2012) 'Human Rights Indicators: A Guide to Measurement and Implemetation', HR/PUB/12/5. UN: New York.
25. OVPC (Office of the Victorian Privacy Commissioner). (2009) 'Privacy Impact Assessments: A guide for the Victorian Public Sector (Edition 2). Melbourne, Australia: OVPC.
26. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. and Stilgoe, J. (2012) 'Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society', Science and Public Policy, 39: 751-60.
27. Ozoliņ a, Z., Mitcham, C., Stilgoe, J., Andana, P. et al. (2012) 'Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level'. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
28. Ozoliņ a, Z., Mitcham, C., Schroeder, D., Mordini, E. et al. (2009) 'Global Governance of Science', Report of the Expert Group on Global Governance of Science to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
29. Riege, A. and Lindsay, N. (2006) 'Knowledge management in the public sector: Stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development', Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3): 24-39.
30. Skorupinski, B. and Ott, K. (2002) 'Technology assessment and ethics', Poiesis and Praxis, 1: 95-122.
31. Slocum, N., Steyaert, S. and Berloznik, R. (2006) Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner's Manual. Brussels: King Baudouin Foundation.
32. Sollie, P. and Dü wel, M. (2011) Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments. Berlin: Springer.
33. Solove, D. J. (2008) Understanding Privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Spiekermann, S. (2012) 'The RFID PIA: Developed by industry, endorsed by regulators'. In: Wright, D. and De Hert, P. (eds) Privacy Impact Assessment, pp. 323-46. Berlin: Springer.
35. Stahl, B. C. (2013) 'Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy and ethics in an emerging framework', Science and Public Policy, 40: XXX-XXX, (this issue).
36. Stoddart, J. (2012) 'Auditing privacy impact assessments: The Canadian experience'. In: Wright, D. and De Hert, P. (eds) Privacy Impact Assessment, pp. 419-36. Berlin: Springer.
37. Taylor, M. (2012) Genetic Data and the Law: A Critical Perspective on Privacy Protection. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
38. TBS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat). (2002) 'Privacy Impact Assessment Guidelines: A Framework to Manage Privacy Risks'. Ottawa: TBS accessed 08 November 2013.
39. Taylor, M. (2010) 'Directive on Privacy Impact Assessment'. Ottawa: TBS.
40. van den Hoven, J. (2007) 'ICT and value sensitive design'. In: Goujon, P., Lavelle, S., Duquenoy, P., Kimppa, K. and Laurent, V. (eds) The Information Society: Innovation, Legitimacy, Ethics and Democracy, pp. 67-72. Berlin: Springer.
41. Venier, S. and Mordini, E. (eds) (2013) 'Final Report - A Privacy and Ethical Impact Assessment Framework for Emerging Sciences and Technologies', PRESCIENT Project, Deliverable 4 accessed 08 November 2013.
42. von Schomberg, R. (2011) 'Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation'. In: Dusseldorp, M. and Beecroft, R. (eds) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, pp. 39-61. Berlin: Springer.
43. von Schomberg, R. (2013) 'A vision of responsible research and innovation'. In: Owen, R., Bessant, J. and Heintz, M. (eds) Responsible Innovation, pp. 51-74. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
44. Wadhwa, K. and Rodrigues, R. (2013) 'Evaluating privacy impact assessments', Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26: 161-80.
45. Warren, S. D. and Brandeis, L. D. (1890) 'The Right To Privacy', Harvard Law Review, 4/5: 193-220.
46. Wright, D. (2011) 'A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology', Ethics and Information Technology, 13: 199-226.
47. Wright, D. (2012) 'The state of the art in privacy impact assessment', Computer Law & Security Review, 28: 54-61.
48. Wright, D. and De Hert, P. (2012) 'Introduction to privacy impact assessment'. In: Wright, D. and De Hert, P. (eds) Privacy Impact Assessment, pp. 3-32. Berlin: Springer.
49. Wright, D., Wadhwa, K., De Hert, P. and Kloza, D. (2011) 'A privacy impact assessment framework for data protection and privacy rights (PIAF Deliverable 1)'. London and Brussels: Trilateral Research and Consulting and Vrije Universiteit Brussels, accessed 08 November 2013.