Economic and intellectual value in existing and new paradigms of electronic scholarly communication

Library Hi Tech

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 37-45

  O'Connor, Steve ^a  

^a CAVAL Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

Information technology; Libraries; Publishing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886562500     PISSN: 07378831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/07378830010314401     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Branin, J. and Case, M. (1998), “Reforming scholarly publishing in the sciences: a librarian perspective”, Notices of the AMS, Vol. 45 No. 4, April, p. 476.
2. Buckland, M. (1998), Private communication, 7 July.
3. “Calendar year statistics for 1998” (1999), OhioLINK Update, Vol. 5 No. 1, p. 3.
4. Elliott, R. (1977), “The impact of electronic publishing on the scientific information chain”, IFLA Journal, Vol. 23 Nos. 5/6.
5. Judson, H.F. (1994), “Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review”, JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 272 No. 2, July, pp. 92-4.
6. Kiernan, V. (1998), “University libraries join with chemical society to create a new, low-cost journal”, Chronicle of Higher Education, 10 July, p. 20.
7. Lynch, C. (1997-98), “Identifiers and their role in networked information applications”, CAUSE/EFFECTS, Winter, pp. 8-14.
8. “Methodical progress: applying the scientific methods to the process of science can be illuminating”, (1997), The Economist, Vol. 344 No. 8036, September, p. 89.
9. Shatz, D. (1996), “Is peer review overrated?”, The Monist, Vol. 79 No. 4, October, p. 536.
10. Slywotzky, A. and Morrison, D. (1998), The Profit Zone: How Strategic Business Design Will Lead You to Tomorrow's Profits, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
11. “To publish or perish: special issue” (1998), Policy Perspective, Vol. 7 No. 4, March, pp. 1-12.