Assessing and comparing relationships between urban environmental stewardship networks and land cover in Baltimore and Seattle

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 120, Issue , 2013, Pages 190-207

  Romolini, Michele ^a   Grove, J Morgan ^b   Locke, Dexter H ^c  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c Yale School of the Environment   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross site analysis; Environmental governance; Social network analysis; Spatial analysis; Stewardship; Urban ecology

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SPATIAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; URBAN GROWTH;

CROSS-SITE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCES; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STEWARDSHIP; URBAN ECOLOGY;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CANOPY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; LAND COVER; NEIGHBORHOOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORK; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY; URBAN SERVICE;

BALTIMORE; MARYLAND; SEATTLE; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84886515281     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akaike H. On the likelihood of a time series model. Statistician 1978, 27:217-235.
2. Anselin L., Syabri I., Kho Y. GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis 2006, 38(1):5-22.
3. Belaire J.A., Drilbin A.K., Johnston D.P., Lynch D.J., Minor E.S. Mapping stewardship networks in urban ecosystems. Conservation Letters 2011, 4:464-473. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00200.x.
4. Bodin O., Crona B., Ernstson H. Social networks in natural resource management-What's there to learn from a structural perspective?. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):r2. Retrieved from 〈http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2〉.
5. Bodin Ö., Crona B.I. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:366-374.
6. Boone C.G., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Schwarz K., Buckley G.L. Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: Why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosystems 2009, 13(3):255-271. 10.1007/s11252-009-0118-7.
7. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis 2002, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
8. Burch W.R., DeLuca D.R. Measuring the impact of natural resource policies 1984, New Mexico University Press, Albuquerque, NM.
9. Connolly J.J., Svendsen E.S., Fisher D.R., Campbell L.K. Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 109:76-84. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001.
10. Crona B., Bodin Ö What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):7.
11. Ernstson H., Barthel S., Andersson E., Borgström S.T. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4):28.
12. Ernstson H., Sorlin S., Elmqvist T. Social movements and ecosystem services-The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 2008, 13(39):1-27.
13. Fisher D.R., Campbell L.K., Svendsen E.S. The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environmental Politics 2012, January:37-41. 10.1080/09644016.2011.643367.
14. Grove J.M., Burch W.R. A social ecology approach to urban ecosystem and landscape analyses. Urban Ecosystems 1997, 1:259-275.
15. Grove J.M., Pickett S.T.A., Whitmer A., Cadenasso M.L. Building an urban LTSER: the case of the Baltimore ecosystem study and the D.C./B.C. ULTRA-Ex Project. Long term socio-ecological research 2013, 369-408. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978-94-007-1177-8. S.J. Singh, H. Haberl, M. Chertow, M. Mirtl, M. Schmid (Eds.).
16. Grove J.M., Troy A.R., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Burch W.R., Cadenasso M.L., Pickett S.T.A. Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 2006, 9(4):578-597. 10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z.
17. Land Cover, Baltimore, MD Raster dataset. Spatial analysis laboratory at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 2007, 2009.
18. Land Use/Land Cover, Seattle, WA Raster dataset. Moskal's remote sensing and geospatial applications laboratory (RSGAL) precision forestry cooperative 2009, School of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
19. Lauber T.B., Decker D.J., Knuth B.A. Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 2008, 42:677-687.
20. Landry S.M., Chakraborty J. Street trees and equity: Evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(11):2651-2670. 10.1068/a41236.
21. Laven D.N., Krymkowski D.H., Ventriss C.L., Manning R.E., Mitchell N.J. From partnerships to networks: New approaches for measuring U.S. National Heritage Area effectiveness. American Evaluation Review 2010, 34(4):271-298. 10.1177/0193841.
22. Machlis G.E., Force J.E., Burch W.R. The human ecosystem. Part I: The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources 1997, 10:347-367.
23. Mandarano L.A. Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Society & Natural Resources 2009, 22(3):245-260. 10.1080/08941920801922182.
24. Moran P.A.P. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1948, 10:243-251.
25. Moskal L.M., Styers D.M., Halabisky M. Monitoring urban forest canopies using object-based image analysis and public domain remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Special Issue on Urban Remote Sensing 2011, 3(10):2243-2262. 10.3390/rs3102243.
26. Muñoz-Erickson T.A., Cutts B.B., Larson E.K., Darby K.J., Nef M., Wutich A., Bolin B. Spanning boundaries in an Arizona watershed partnership: Information networks as tools for entrenchment or ties for collaboration?. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(3):1-22.
27. O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M. A report on the city of Baltimore's existing and possible tree canopy 2009, Burlington, VT, Spatial Analysis Lab, Rubenstein School of the Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Retrieved from 〈http://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/utc/reports/UTC_Report_BACI_2007.pdf〉.
28. Pham T., Apparicio P., Séguin A., Landry S., Gagnon M. Spatial distribution of vegetation in Montreal: An uneven distribution or environmental inequity?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 107(3):214-224. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.002.
29. Prell C., Hubacek K., Reed M. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 2009, 22(6):501-518. 10.1080/08941920802199202.
30. Provan K.G., Milward H.B. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 2001, 61(4):414-423. 10.1111/0033-3352.00045.
31. Raddatz L., Mennis J. Environmental justice in Hamburg, Germany. The Professional Geographer 2012, 64(2):18. 10.1080/00330124.2012.700500.
32. Romolini M. Governance of 21st century sustainable cities: Examining stewardship networks in Baltimore & Seattle. Unpublished doctoral dissertation 2013, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
33. Romolini M., Brinkley W., Wolf K.L. What is urban environmental stewardship? Constructing a practitioner-derived framework. Research note PNW-RN-566 2012, Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Seattle, WA, Retrieved from 〈http://www.naturewithin.info/CivicEco/pnw_rn566_USFS_3CM_Rsrch_Note.pdf〉.
34. Sampson R.J., Morenoff J.D., Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing "neighborhood effects": Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 2002, 28:443-478. 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114.
35. Sandström A. Policy networks: The relation between structure and performance. Doctoral dissertation 2008, Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
36. Schneider M., Scholz J., Lubell M., Mindruta D., Edwardsen M. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science 2003, 47(1):143-158. 10.1111/1540-5907.00010.
37. Seto K.C., Sánchez-Rodríguez R., Fragkias M. The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2010, 35(1):167-194. 10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125336.
38. Svendsen E. Civic environmental stewardship as a form of governance in New York City. Unpublished doctoral dissertation 2010, Columbia University, New York.
39. Svendsen E.S., Campbell L.K. Urban ecological stewardship: Understanding the structure, function and management. Cities and the Environment (CATE) 2008, 1(1):1-32.
40. Troy A.R., Grove J.M., O'Neil-Dunne J.P.M., Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L. Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environmental Management 2007, 40(3):394-412. 10.1007/s00267-006-0112-2.
41. United Nations World urbanization prospects: The 2011 revision 2012, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, Retrieved March 21, 2013 from 〈http://esa.un.org/unup/unup/p2k0data.asp〉.
42. Ward M.D., Gleditsch K. Spatial regression models 2008, Sage, London.
43. Wolf K.L., Blahna D., Brinkley W., Romolini M. Environmental stewardship footprint research: Linking human agency and ecosystem health in the Puget Sound region. Urban Ecosystems 2013, 16:13-32.
44. Zhou W., Troy A.R., Grove J.M., Jenkins J.C. Can money buy green? Demographic and socioeconomic predictors of lawn-care expenditures and lawn greenness in urban residential areas. Society & Natural Resources 2009, 22(8):744-760. 10.1080/08941920802074330.