A comparison of cancer survivors from the PROMIS study selecting telephone versus online questionnaires

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2632-2635

  Williams, Megan Scull ^a   Snyder, Denise C ^a,b   Sloane, Richard ^b   Levens, Justin ^b   Flynn, Kathryn E ^b,c   Dombeck, Carrie B ^d   Demark Wahnefried, Wendy ^a,e   Weinfurt, Kevin P ^b,d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^d DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

cancer; data collection; internet; oncology; surveys; telephone

Indexed keywords

AGED; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SURVIVOR; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; ONLINE SURVEY; PROSTATE CANCER; RACE; SEXUALITY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW;

CANCER; DATA COLLECTION; INTERNET; ONCOLOGY; SURVEYS; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REMINDER SYSTEMS; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVIVORS; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84886442250     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3330     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Usage over time. 2010 [updated November 9, 2010; cited 2013 April 25]; Available from: http://www.pewinternet. org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Usage-Over-Time.aspx.
2. Hacker ED,. Technology and quality of life outcomes. Semin Oncol Nurs 2010; 26 (1): 47-58.
3. Arab L, Wesseling-Perry K, Jardack P, Henry J, Winter A,. Eight self-administered 24-hour dietary recalls using the Internet are feasible in African Americans and Whites: the energetics study. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110 (6): 857-64.
4. Rankin KM, Rauscher GH, McCarthy B, Erdal S, Lada P, Il'yasova D, et al,. Comparing the reliability of responses to telephone-administered versus self-administered Web-based surveys in a case-control study of adult malignant brain cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17 (10): 2639-46.
5. Couper M, Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q 2000; 64 (4): 464-94.
6. Link MW, Mokdad AH,. Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches. J Stud Alcohol 2005; 66 (2): 239-45.
7. Rivara FP, Koepsell TD, Wang J, Durbin D, Jaffe KM, Vavilala M, et al,. Comparison of telephone with World Wide Web-based responses by parents and teens to a follow-up survey after injury. Health Serv Res 2011; 46 (3): 964-81.
8. Parks KA, Pardi AM, Bradizza CM,. Collecting data on alcohol use and alcohol-related victimization: a comparison of telephone and Web-based survey methods. J Stud Alcohol 2006; 67 (2): 318-23.
9. Little R, Rubin D,. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 1st ed. wiley: New York, NY; 1987.
10. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al,. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63 (11): 1179-94.