Combining boolean consistent fuzzy logic and ahp illustrated on the web service selection problem

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL.1, 2014, Pages 84-93

  Dragović, Ivana ^a   Turajlić, Nina ^a   Radojević, Dragan ^b   Petrović, Bratislav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b MIHAJLO PUPIN INSTITUTE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

AHP; Boolean consistent fuzzy logic; Fuzzy logic; Logical aggregation; Web service selection

Indexed keywords

AHP; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; APPLICATION SCENARIO; FUZZY APPROACH; WEB SERVICE SELECTION;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES;

FUZZY LOGIC;

EID: 84886437117     PISSN: 18756891     EISSN: 18756883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2014.853935     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. T. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
2. D.-Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European J. Oper. Res., 95(3) (1996), pp. 649-655.
3. J.J. Buckley, T. Feuring and Y. Hayashi, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited, European J. Oper. Res., 129(1) (2001), pp. 48-64.
4. P.J.M. Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1-3) (1983), pp. 199-227.
5. F. Torfi, R. Z. Farahani and S. Rezapour, Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives, Applied Soft Computing, 10(2) (2010), pp. 520-528.
6. C. Kahraman, Z. Ulukan and E. Tolga, A fuzzy weighted evaluation method using objective and subjective measures, in Proc. of EIS'98, Vol. 1 (University of La Laguna, Tenerife, 1998), pp. 57-63).
7. T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of the analytic network process-Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network, Journal of Systems science and Systems engineering, 13(2) (2004), pp. 129-157.
8. K. S. Chin, D. W. Tang, J. B. Yang, S. Y. Wong and H. Wang, Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6) (2009), pp. 9879-9890.
9. B. Wolfslehner, H. Vacik and M. J. Lexer, Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management, Forest Ecology and Management, 207(1) (2005), pp. 157-170.
10. J.-J. Shuai, A Fuzzy MCDM Partnership Selection Model - Case of the IC Design House, in Proc. of ICICIC (Kaohsiung, China, 2009), pp. 1452-1455.
11. D. Radojevic, Fuzzy Set Theory in Boolean Frame, Int. J. of Comput. Commun., 3 (2008), pp. 121-131.
12. D. Radojevic, Interpolative Realization of Boolean Algebra as a Consistent Frame for Gradation and/or Fuzziness, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 218 (2008), pp. 295-317.
13. C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1981).
14. T. Saaty, Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988).
15. T. Saaty, How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European J. Oper. Res., 48(1) (1990), pp. 9-26.
16. F. Lootsma, Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2(2) (1993), pp. 87-110.
17. J. Barzilai and F. Lootsma, Power relation and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6(3) (1997), pp. 155-165.
18. A. Ishizaka and A. Labib, Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11) (2011), pp. 14336-14345.
19. L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Inform. and Control, 8 (1965), pp. 338-353.
20. D. Radojevic, Logical Aggregation - Why and How, in Proc. of FLINS'10, (Chengdu, China, 2010), (pp. 511-517).
21. D. Radojevic, Logical Aggregation Based on Interpolative Boolean Algebra, Mathware & Soft Computing, 15(1) (2008), pp. 125-141.
22. W3C, QoS for Web Services: Requirements and Possible Approaches,http://www.w3c.or.kr/kr-office/TR/2003/ws-qos/ (2003)
23. C. Herssens, IJ. Jureta and S. Faulkner, Capturing and Using QoS Relationships to Improve Service Selection, in Proc. of CAiSE '08 (Montpellier, France, 2008), pp. 312-327).
24. I. Dragovic, N. Turajlic and D. Radojevic, Extending AHP with Boolean Consistent Fuzzy Logic and Its Application in Web Service Selection, in Proc. of FLINS'12 (Istanbul, Turkey, 2012), pp. 576-591.
25. M. Lin, J. Xie, H. Guo, and H. Wang, Solving QoS- driven Web service dynamic composition as fuzzy constraint satisfaction, in Proc. of EEE'05 (Hong Kong, China, 2005), pp. 9-14.
26. Y. Zhang, S.S. Zhang and S.Q. Han, A New Methodology of QoS Evaluation and Service Selection for Ubiquitous Computing, LNCS 4138 (2006), pp. 69-80.
27. P. Wang, K.-M. Chao, C.-C. Lo, C.-L. Huang and Y. Li, A Fuzzy Model for Selection of QoS-Aware Web Services, in Proc. of ICEBE'06 (Shanghai, China, 2006), pp. 585-593.
28. P. Xiong and Y. Fan, QoS-Aware Web Service Selection by a Synthetic Weight, in Proc. of FSKD'07 (Haikou, China, 2007), pp. 632-637.
29. I. Sora, D. Todinca and C. Avram, Translating user preferences into fuzzy rules for the automatic selection of services, in Proc. of SACI'09 (Timisoara, Romania, 2009), pp. 497-502.
30. S. Agarwal and S. Lamparter, User Preference Based Automated Selection of Web Service Compositions, in Proc. of the ICSOC Workshop on Dynamic Web Processes, (Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005), pp. 1-12.
31. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 78, (Springer, 2005).
32. M Godse, R Sonar and S Mulik, The Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritizing Features in the Selection of Web Service, in Proc. of ECOWS'08 (Dublin, Ireland, 2008), pp. 41-50.
33. S. Agarwal, S. Lamparter and R. Studer, Making Web services tradable: A policy-based approach for specifying preferences on Web service properties, J. Web Sem., 7(1) (2009), pp. 11-20.