Foraging behavior delays mechanically-stimulated escape responses in fish

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 780-786

  Bohórquez Herrera, Jimena ^a   Kawano, Sandy M ^b   Domenici, Paolo ^c  

^a SQUALUS   (Colombia)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; APPETITE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ESCAPE BEHAVIOR; FISH; FOOD CHAIN; LOCOMOTION; MORPHOMETRICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; UNITED STATES; VIDEORECORDING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; ESCAPE REACTION; FISHES; FOOD CHAIN; LOCOMOTION; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; VIDEO RECORDING; WASHINGTON;

EID: 84886411741     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: 15577023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/ict031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Catania KC. 2009. Tentacled snakes turn C-starts to their advantage and predict future prey behaviour. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:11183-7
2. Dadda M, Bisazza A. 2006. Does brain asymmetry allow efficient performance of simultaneous tasks? Anim Behav 72:523-9
3. Dadda M, Koolhaas WH, Domenici P. 2010. Behavioural asymmetry affects escape performance in a teleost fish. Biol Lett 6:414-7
4. Domenici P. 2010a. Escape responses in fish: Kinematics, performance and behaviour. In: Domenici P, Kapoor BG, editors. Fish locomotion: An eco-ethological perspective. Enfield (CT): Science Publishers. p. 123-70
5. Domenici P. 2010b. Context-dependent variability in the components of fish escape response: Integrating locomotor performance and behaviour. J Exp Zool 313A:59-79
6. Domenici P, Blake RW. 1991. The kinematics and performance of the escape response in the angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei). J Exp Biol 156:187-205
7. Domenici P, Blake RW. 1993. Escape trajectories in angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei). J Exp Biol 177:253-72
8. Domenici P, Blake RW. 1997. The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J Exp Biol 200:1165-78
9. Domenici P, Turesson H, Brodersen J, Brönmark C. 2008 Predator-induced morphology enhances escape locomotion in crucian carp. Proc R Soc B 275:195-201
10. Dukas R. 2004. Causes and consequences of limited attention. Brain Behav Evol 63:197-210
11. Eaton RC, Hackett JT. 1984. The role of Mauthner cells in fast-starts involving escape in teleost fish. In: Eaton RC, editor. Neural mechanisms of startle behaviour. New York: Plenum Press. p. 213-66
12. Eaton R, Emberley DS. 1991. How stimulus direction determines the trajectory of the Mauthner-initiated escape response in a teleost fish. J Exp Biol 161:469-87
13. Eaton RC, Lee RKK, Foreman MB. 2001. The Mauthner cell and other identified neurons of the brainstem escape network of fish. Prog Neurobiol 63:467-85
14. Fuiman LA, Rose KA, Cowan JH, Smith EP. 2006. Survival skills required for predator evasion by fish larvae and their relation to laboratory measures of performance. Anim Behav 71:1389-99
15. Godin JGJ. 1997. Evading predators. In: Godin JGJ, editor. Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 191-236
16. Godin JGJ, Sproul CD. 1988. Risk taking in parasitized sticklebacks under threat of predation: Effects of energetic need and food availability. Can J Zool 66:2360-7
17. Hedrick TL. 2008. Software techniques for two- And threedimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim 3:1-6
18. Kaby U, Lind J. 2003. What limits predator detection in blue tits (Parus caeruleus): Posture, task or orientation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:534-8
19. Kohashi T, Oda Y. 2008. Initiation of Mauthner- or non- Mauthner-mediated fast escape evoked by different modes of sensory input. J Neurosci 28:10641-53
20. Kolpakov NV, Dolganova NT. 2006. On the biology of Blepsias cirrhosus (Hemitripteridae) from coastal waters of northern Primorye. J Ichthyol 46:519-24
21. Krause J, Godin JGJ. 1996. Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behaviour and predation risk: Predators take advantage of unwary prey. Behav Ecol 7:264-71
22. Lanczos C. 1956. Applied analysis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall. Langerhans RB, Layman CA, Shokrollahi AM, DeWitt TJ. 2004. Predator-driven phenotypic diversification in Gambusia affinis. Evolution 58:2305-18
23. Marras S, Killen SS, Claireaux G, Domenici P, McKenzie DJ. 2011. Behavioural and kinematic components of the fast-start escape response in fish: Individual variation and temporal repeatability. J Exp Biol 214:3102-10
24. Miller DJ, Lea RN. 1972. Guide to the coastal marine fishes of California, Vol. 157. California Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin
25. Sass GG, Motta PJ. 2002. The effects of satiation on strike mode and prey capture kinematics in the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Environ Biol Fishes 65:441-54
26. Scharf FS, Buckel JA, McGinn PA, Juanes F. 2003 Vulnerability of marine forage fishes to piscivory: Effects of prey behavior on susceptibility to attack and capture. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 294:41-59
27. Walker JA, Ghalambor CK, Griset OL, McKenney D, Reznick DN. 2005. Do faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Funct Ecol 19:808-15
28. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM. 1986. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Stud Behav 16:229-49