Online dynamic security assessment with missing PMU measurements: A data mining approach

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 1969-1977

  He, Miao ^a   Vittal, Vijay ^a   Zhang, Junshan ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Boosting; Data mining; Decision tree; Ensemble learning; Missing PMU data; Online dynamic security assessment; Random subspace method; Transient stability

Indexed keywords

BOOSTING; ENSEMBLE LEARNING; MISSING PMU DATA; ON-LINE DYNAMIC SECURITY ASSESSMENT; RANDOM SUBSPACE METHOD;

DECISION TREES; STABILITY;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84886405967     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2246822     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. L. Wehenkel, T. Van Cutsem, and M. Ribbens-Pavella, "An artificial intelligence framework for online transient stability assessment of power systems," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 789-800, May 1989.
2. S. Rovnyak, S. Kretsinger, J. Thorp, and D. Brown, "Decision trees for real-time transient stability prediction," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1417-1426, Aug. 1994.
3. K. Sun, S. Likhate, V. Vittal, V. Kolluri, and S. Mandal, "An online dynamic security assessment scheme using phasor measurements and decision trees," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1935-1943, Nov. 2007.
4. R. Diao, K. Sun, V. Vittal, R. O'Keefe, M. Richardson, N. Bhatt, D. Stradford, and S. Sarawgi, "Decision tree-based online voltage security assessment using PMU measurements," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 832-839, May 2009.
5. R. Diao, V. Vittal, and N. Logic, "Design of a real-time security assessment tool for situational awareness enhancement in modern power systems," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 957-965, May 2010.
6. M. He, J. Zhang, and V. Vittal, "A data mining framework for online dynamic security assessment: Decision trees, boosting, complexity analysis," in Proc. 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, Jan. 2012, pp. 1-8.
7. Alberta Electric System Operator Rules, Section 502.9: Synchrophasor Measurement Unit Technical Requirements, Aug. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.aeso.ca/downloads/2012-08-30-Section-502-9-phasor.pdf.
8. Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Technical Report, Improving the Availability of Synchrophasor Data, Aug. 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.selinc.com/TheSynchrophasorReport.aspx?id=98004.
9. R. Emami and A. Abur, "Robust measurement design by placing synchronized phasor measurements on network branches," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38-43, Feb. 2010.
10. A. Gomez-Exposito, A. Abur, P. Rousseaux, A. de la Villa Jaen, and C. Gomez-Quiles, "On the use of PMUs in power system state estimation," in Proc. 17th Power Systems Computation Conf., Stockholm, Sweden, Aug. 2011.
11. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1984.
12. Y. Wang, W. Li, and J. Lu, "Reliability analysis of wide-area measurement system," IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1483-1491, Jul. 2010.
13. Powertech Labs, DSATools: Dynamic Security Assessment Softwares. [Online]. Available: http://www.dsatools.com.
14. Y. Freund and R. Schapire, "A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting," J. Comput. Syst. Sci., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119-139, Aug. 1997.
15. R. Banfield, L. Hall, K. Bowyer, and W. Kegelmeyer, "A comparison of decision tree ensemble creation techniques," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 173-180, Jan. 2007.
16. R. Bryll, R. Gutierrez-osuna, and F. K. Quek, "Attribute bagging: Improving accuracy of classifier ensembles by using random feature subsets," Pattern Recognit., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1291-1302, Jun. 2003.
17. T. K. Ho, "Random decision forests," in Proc. Third Intl Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, QC, Canada, Aug. 1995, pp. 278-282.
18. A. Phadke and J. Thorp, Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2008.
19. T. K. Ho, "Random decision forests," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 832-844, Aug. 1998.
20. L. Breiman, "Random forests," Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, Oct. 2001.
21. V. Khiabani, O. P. Yadav, and R. Kavesseri, "Reliability-based placement of phasor measurement units in power systems," J. Risk Reliab., vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 109-117, Feb. 2012.
22. L. Hyafil and R. L. Rivest, "Constructing optimal binary decision trees is NP-complete," Inf. Process. Lett., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15-17, May 1976.
23. M. Pai, Energy Function Analysis for Power System Stability. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer, 1989.
24. F. Aminifar, S. Bagheri-Shouraki, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Shahidehpour, "Reliability modeling of PMUs using fuzzy sets," IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2384-2391, Oct. 2010.
25. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, Prediction. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2008.
26. C. Zheng, V. Malbasa, and M. Kezunovic, "Regression tree for stability margin prediction using synchrophasor measurements," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., to be published.
27. IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems, IEEE Std. C37. 118-2005, 2005.