Parasitism, secondary triggering, and depth of embedding

Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 151-174

  Den Dikken, Marcel ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886403807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Abney, S. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Chomsky, N..2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Cinque, G. 1990. Types of A dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Craenenbroeck, J. van. 2004. Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. PhD diss., University of Leiden/ULCL.
8. Dikken, M. den. 1995. Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic and causative constructions. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dikken, M. 2002. Direct and parasitic polarity item licensing. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 35-66.
10. Giannakidou, A. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Giannakidou, A. 2000. Negative . . . concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457-523.
12. Grohmann, K. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Haegeman, L. 2002. West Flemish negation and the derivation of SOV-order in West Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25: 154-89.
14. Haegeman, L., and R. Zanuttini. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233-51.
15. Hoeksema, J. 2003. Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen.
16. Horn, L. 1996. Flaubert triggers, squatitive negation, and other quirks of grammar. Tabu 26. Repr. in Perspectives on negation and polarity items, ed. J. Hoeksema, H. Rullman, V. Sanchez-Valencia, and T. van der Wouden, 173-200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.
17. Klima, E. 1964. Negation in English. In The structure of language, ed. J. Fodor and J. Katz. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Koster, J. 1978. Why subject sentences don't exist. In Recent transformational studies in European languages, ed. S. J. Keyser, 53-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Ladusaw, W. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.
20. Laka, I. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
21. Linebarger, M. 1980. The grammar of negative polarity. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
22. Linebarger, M. 1987. Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325-87.
23. Matushansky, O. 2003. DPs and phase theory. Unpublished manuscript, CNRS/University of Paris VIII.
24. Müller, G., and W. Sternefeld. 1993. Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461-507.
25. Pesetsky, D., and E. Torrego. 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 355-426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Postal, P. 2000. An introduction to the grammar of squat. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.
27. Progovac, L. 1988. A binding approach to polarity sensitivity. PhD diss., University of Southern California.
28. Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The noun phrase. In Syntax and Semantics 27: The syntactic structure of Hungarian, ed. F. Kiefer and K. é. Kiss. New York: Academic Press.
29. Szabolcsi, A. 2004. Positive polarity-Negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 409-52.
30. Troseth, E. 2004. Negative inversion and degree inversion in the English DP. Linguistics in the Big Apple. New York: CUNY/NYU. Available from http://web.gc.cuny.edu/Linguistics/liba/papers/troseth_ LIBA.pdf.
31. Uribe-Etxebarria, M. 1994. Interface licensing conditions on negative polarity items: A theory of polarity and tense interactions. PhD diss., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
32. Vries, M. de. 2001. The syntax of relativization. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam/LOT.
33. Wouden, T. van der. 2001. Three modal verbs. In Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen, ed. S.
34. Watts, J. West, and H.-J. Solms, 189-210. Tübingen linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
35. Zwart, J-W. 1997. Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.