A child surrounds this brain: the future of neurological difference according to scientists, parents and diagnosed young adults

Advances in Medical Sociology

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages 3-26

  Rapp, Rayna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886388836     PISSN: 10576290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albrecht, G., Seelman, K. D., & Bury, M. (2001). Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Bettelheim, B. (1967). The empty fortress: Infantile autism and the birth of the self. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
4. Centers for Disease Control. (2011). Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: What Should You Know? Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/ data.html. Accessed on June 16, 2011.
5. Choudhury, S., Nagel, S. K., & Slaby, J. (2009). Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties, 4, 61-77.
6. Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (2010). The social distribution of moxie: The legacy of Christine Sleeter. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30, 2. Availalbe at http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/1239/1284. Accessed on 16 August 2011.
7. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Lock, M., Freeman, S., Sharples, R., & Lloyd, S. (2006). When it runs in the family: Putting susceptibility genes in perspective. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 277-300. (Pubitemid 43862448)
9. Luhrmann, T. M. (2000). Of two minds: The growing disorder of American psychiatry. New York, NY: Knopf.
10. Moreira, T., & Palladino, P. (2005). Between truth and hope: On Parkinson's disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the 'self'. History of the Human Sciences, 18, 55-82. (Pubitemid 43497509)
11. Nicolelis, M. (2011, March 15). DRshow.org radio interview. Retrieved from http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2011-03-16/miguel-nicolelis-beyond- boundaries. Accessed on March 18, 2011.
12. Ortega, F. (2009). The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. BioSocieties, 4, 425-445.
13. Pickersgill, M. D., Martin, P., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2011). Constituting neurologic subjects: neuroscience, subjectivity, and the mundane significance of the brain. Subjectivity, 4, 346-365.
14. Rapp, R., & Ginsburg, F. (2011). Reverberations: Disability and the kinship imaginary. Anthropological Quarterly, 84, 379-410.
15. Rapp, R., & Ginsburg, F. (2012). Disability worlds. In: M. Inhorn & E. Wertzel (Eds.), Medical anthropology at the crossroads. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16. Roseberry, W. (1982). Balinese cockfights and the seduction of anthropology. Social Research, 49, 1013-1029.
17. Sleeter, C. E. (1987). Why is there learning disabilities? A critical analysis of the birth of the field with its social context. In: T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution (pp. 210-237). London: Palmer Press.
18. Tough, P. (2011, March 21). The poverty clinic. The New Yorker, pp. 25-30.
19. Vidal, F. (2011, February 11). The self-defeating logic of the Neuro. Psy-Ences colloquium, New York University.
20. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470-477. (Pubitemid 351317605)