Public Objects and Private Qualia: The Scope and Limits of Psychophysics

Handbook of Experimental Phenomenology: Visual Perception of Shape, Space and Appearance

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 71-89

  Hoffman, Donald D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hallucinations; Illusions; Interface theory; Psychophysical laws; Psychophysics; Standard framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886350139     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118329016.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Barfield, O.(1957). Saving the appearances: A study in idolatry. London: Faber and Faber.
2. Bayes, T.(1763). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53, 370-418.
3. Chalmers, D.(1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Cronin, T. W., & Marshall, N. J.(2002). The unique visual world of mantis shrimps. In F. Prete (Ed.), Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems (pp. 239-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Cronin, T. W., Marshall, N. J., & Land, M. F.(1994). The unique visual system of the mantis shrimp. American Scientist, 82(4), 356-365.
6. Da Pos, O., & Albertazzi, L.(2010)It is in the nature of colors. Seeing and Perceiving, 23, 39-73.
7. Fechner, G.(1860)Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
8. Hoffman, D. D.(1998). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see. New York: W. W. Norton.
9. Hoffman, D. D.(2006a). The scrambling theorem: A simple proof of the logical possibility of spectrum inversion. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 31-45.
10. Hoffman, D. D.(2006b). The scrambling theorem unscrambled: A response to commentaries. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 51-53.
11. Hoffman, D. D.(2008). Conscious realism and the mind-body problem. Mind & Matter, 6, 87-121.
12. Hoffman, D. D.(2009). The interface theory of perception: Natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction. In S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, & B. Schiele (Eds.), Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives (pp. 48-165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hudson, T. E., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S.(2008). Optimal compensation for temporal uncertainty in movement planning. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(7), 1-9.
14. Geisler, W. S., & Diehl, R. L.(2003). A Bayesian approach to the evolution of perceptual and cognitive systems. Cognitive Science, 27, 379-402.
15. Geisler, W. S., Perry, J. S., Super, B. J., & Gallogy, D.P.(2001). Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Research, 41, 711-724.
16. Kanizsa, G.(1979). Organization in vision. New York: Praeger.
17. Knill, D. C., Kersten, D., & Yuille, A.(1996). Introduction: A Bayesian formulation of visual perception. In D. Knill & W. Richards (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 1-21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Knill, D., & Richards, W. (Eds.).(1996). Perception as Bayesian inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Koenderink, J. J.(2011). Vision and information. In L. Albertazzi, G. J. Van Tonder, & D. Vishnawath (Eds.), Perception beyond inference: The information content of visual processes (pp. 27-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
20. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn A. J., de Ridder, H., & Oomes, S.(2010). Visual rays are parallel. Perception, 39, 1163-1171.
21. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Todd, J. T.(2009). Wide distribution of external local sign in the normal population. Psychological Research, 73, 14-22.
22. Lehar, S.(2003). Gestalt isomorphism and the primacy of subjective conscious experience: A Gestalt Bubble model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 375-444.
23. Lin, J. Y., Pype, A. D., Murray, S. O., & Boynton, G. M.(2010). Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time. PLoS Biology, 8(3), 1-6.
24. Locke, J.(1690/1979). An essay concerning human understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Maloney, L. T.(2002). Statistical decision theory and biological vision. In D. Heyer & R. Mausfeld (Eds.), Perception and the physical world: Psychological and philosophical issues in perception (pp. 145-189). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26. Marion, B., Stephens, K., Mark, J., & Hoffman, D. D.(2011). Seeing truth can minimize fitness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Mark, J., Marion, B., & Hoffman, D. D.(2010). Natural selection and veridical perception. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266, 504-515.
28. Marshall, J., & Oberwinkler, J.(1999). The colourful world of the mantis shrimp. Nature, 401, 873-874.
29. Mausfeld, R.(2002). The physicalist trap in perception theory. In D. Heyer & R. Mausfeld (Eds.), Perception and the physical world: Psychological and philosophical issues in perception (pp. 75-112). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
30. Michotte, A.(1963). The perception of causality. London: Methuen.
31. Noe, A., & Regan, J. K.(2002). On the brain-basis of visual consciousness: A sensorimotor account. In A. Noe & E. Thompson (Eds.), Vision and mind: Selected readings in the philosophy of perception (pp. 567-598). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Nowak, M. A.(2006). Evolutionary dynamics: Exploring the equations of life. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
33. Orzack, S. H., & Sober, E.(2001). Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Palmer, S.(1999a). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Palmer, S.(1999b). Color, consciousness, and the isomorphism constraint. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 923-989.
36. Pinker, S.(1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton.
37. Purves, D., Lotto, R. B., Williams, S. M., Nundy, S., & Yang, Z.(2001). Why we see things the way we do: Evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 356, 285-297.
38. Revuz, D.(1984). Markov chains. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
39. Seitz, A. R., Kim, D., & Watanabe, T.(2009). Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans. Neuron, 61, 700-707.
40. Stevens, S. S.(1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.
41. Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V.(2010). The attentional boost effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition, 115, 118-132.