Continuous water-level monitoring in the assessment of groundwater remediation and refinement of a conceptual site model

Remediation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 49-61

  Quinn, John J ^a   Johnson, Robert L ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886316355     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.20059     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, M. P., & Woessner, W. W. (1992). Applied groundwater modeling: Simulation of flow and advective transport. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Campbell, B. G., & Landmeyer, J. E. (2000). Assessment of the potential effects of phytoremediation on ground-water flow at a former manufactured gas plant site, Charleston, South Carolina. Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, 32(7), 127.
3. Crumbling, D. M. (2004, March 25). Summary of the Triad approach. White paper. Washington, DC: Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
4. Retrieved March 28, 2005, from http://www.triadcentral.org/ref/doc/triadsummary.pdf
5. Drost, W., Klotz, D., Koch, A., Moser, H., Neumaier, F., & Rauert, W. (1968). Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes. Water Resources Research, 4(1), 125–146.
6. Eberts, S. M., Harvey, G. J., Jones, S. A., & Beckman, S. W. (2003). Multiple-process assessment for a chlorinated-solvent plume. In S. C. McCutcheon & J. L. Schnoor (Eds.), Phytoremediation: Transformation and control of contaminants (pp. 589–633). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Ground water. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Hall, B. L., Baldwin, C. K., Lachmar, T. E., & Dupont, R. R. (2000, Spring). Instrumentation design and installation for monitoring air injection ground water remediation technologies. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, pp. 46–54.
9. Hirsh, S. R., Compton, H. R., Matey, D. H., Wrobel, J. G., & Schneider, W. H. (2003). Five-year pilot study: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. In S. C. McCutcheon & J. L. Schnoor (Eds.), Phytoremediation: Transformation and control of contaminants (pp. 635–659). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Killey, M. A., & Trask, C. B. (1984). Geotechnical site investigation for an advanced photon source at Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois. Illinois State Geological Survey, EG 147.
11. Landmeyer, J. E. (2001). Monitoring the effect of poplar trees on petroleum-hydrocarbon and chlorinated- solvent contaminated groundwater. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 3(1), 61–85.
12. Lee, J. Y., Cheon, J. Y., Lee, K. K., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, M. H. (2001). Factors affecting the distribution of hydrocarbon contaminants and hydrogeochemical parameters in a shallow sand aquifer. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 50(1-2), 139–158.
13. Palmer, C. D. (1993). Borehole dilution tests in the vicinity of an extraction well. Journal of Hydrology, 146, 245–266.
14. Quinn, J. J. (2005). Glacial stratigraphy animation.
15. Retrieved March 7, 2005, from http://web.ead.anl.gov/phyto/
16. Quinn, J. J., Negri, M. C., Hinchman, R. R., Moos, L. P., Wozniak, J. B., & Gatliff, E. G. (2001). Predicting the effect of deep-rooted hybrid poplars on the groundwater flow system at a phytoremediation site. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 3(1), 41–60.
17. Rosenberry, D. O., Glaser, P. H., Siegel, D. I., & Weeks, E. P. (2003). Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands. Water Resources Research, 39(3), 1066, doi:10.1029/2002WR001377.