More attention when speaking: Does it help or does it hurt?

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 2770-2780

  Nozari, Nazbanou ^a   Thompson Schill, Sharon L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Executive functions; Language production; Selective attention; Transcranial direct cortical stimulation (tDCS)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

COGNITIVE CONTROL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CORTICAL STIMULATION (TDCS);

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886299225     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Antal A., Nitsche M., Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex. Brain Research Bulletin 2006, 68(6):459-463. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.006.
2. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press.
3. Baker J.M., Rorden C., Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke 2010, 41(6):1229-1236. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785.
4. Boggio P.S., Ferrucci R., Rigonatti S.P., Covre P., Nitsche M., Pascual-Leone A., et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2006, 249(1):31-38. 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.062.
5. Braboszcz C., Delorme A. Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering. NeuroImage 2011, 54(4):3040-3047. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.008.
6. Brown-Schmidt S., Tanenhaus M. Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54(4):592-609. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.008.
7. Bundesen C. A theory of visual-attention. Psychological Review 1990, 97(4):523-547. 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523.
8. Bunge S., Hazeltine E., Scanlon M., Rosen A., Gabrieli J. Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. NeuroImage 2002, 17(3):1562-1571. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1252.
9. Buschkuehl M., Jaeggi S.M. Improving intelligence: A literature review. Swiss Medical Weekly 2010, 140(19-20):266-272.
10. Cattaneo Z., Pisoni A., Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over broca's region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience 2011, 183:64-70. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.058.
11. Cerruti C., Schlaug G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex enhances complex verbal associative thought. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(10):1980-1987. 10.1162/jocn.2008.21143.
12. Cisek P. Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(38):9761-9770. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5605-05.2006.
13. Clark V.P., Coffman B.A., Trumbo M.C., Gasparovic C. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces localized and specific alterations in neurochemistry: A H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neuroscience Letters 2011, 500(1):67-71. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.244.
14. Clery H., Andersson F., Fonlupt P., Gomot M. Brain correlates of automatic visual change detection. NeuroImage 2013, 75:117-122. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.050.
15. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95(3):831-838. 10.1073/pnas.95.3.831.
16. Corbetta M., Miezin F., Dobmeyer S., Shulman G., Petersen S. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed-functional-anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience 1991, 11(8):2383-2402.
17. Coull J. fMRI studies of temporal attention: Allocating attention within, or towards, time. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 21(2):216-226. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.011.
18. Deco G., Lee T. A unified model of spatial and object attention based on inter-cortical biased competition. Neurocomputing 2002, 44:775-781. 10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00471-X.
19. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual-attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.18.1.193.
20. Duncan J. The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review 1980, 87(3):272-300. 10.1037//0033-295X.87.3.272.
21. Embretson S. The role of working-memory capacity and general control processes in intelligence. Intelligence 1995, 20(2):169-189. 10.1016/0160-2896(95)90031-4.
22. Engle R., Tuholski S., Laughlin J., Conway A. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 1999, 128(3):309-331. 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309.
23. Ferrucci R., Mameli F., Guidi I., Mrakic-Sposta S., Vergari M., Marceglia S., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2008, 71(7):493-498. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3.
24. Fertonani A., Rosini S., Cotelli M., Rossini P.M., Miniussi C. Naming facilitation induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 208(2):311-318. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.10.030.
25. Fiori V., Coccia M., Marinelli C.V., Vecchi V., Bonifazi S., Ceravolo M.G., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(9):2309-2323.
26. Floel A., Roesser N., Miichka O., Knecht S., Breitenstein C. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(8):1415-1422. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20098.
27. Frank D.W., Sabatinelli D. Stimulus-driven reorienting in the ventral frontoparietal attention network: The role of emotional content. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:116. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00116.
28. Fregni F., Boggio P., Nitsche M., Bermpohl F., Antal A., Feredoes E., et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 166(1):23-30. 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6.
29. Fridriksson J., Richardson J.D., Baker J.M., Rorden C. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia A double-blind, sham-controlled study. Stroke 2011, 42(3):819-821. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600288.
30. Fries P., Reynolds J., Rorie A., Desimone R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 2001, 291(5508):1560-1563. 10.1126/science.1055465.
31. Galea J.M., Celnik P. Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102(1):294-301. 10.1152/jn.00184.2009.
32. Gerloff C., Corwell B., Chen R., Hallett M., Cohen L. Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences. Brain 1997, 120:1587-1602. 10.1093/brain/120.9.1587.
33. Glosser G., Goodglass H. Disorders of executive control functions among aphasic and other brain-dam-aged patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1990, 12(4):485-501.
34. Grabenhorst F., Rolls E.T. Attentional modulation of affective versus sensory processing: Functional connectivity and a top-down biased activation theory of selective attention. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 104(3):1649-1660. 10.1152/jn.00352.2010.
35. Griffin Z., Bock K. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 2000, 11(4):274-279. 10.1111/1467-9280.00255.
36. Hales J.B., Brewer J.B. Parietal and frontal contributions to episodic encoding of location. Behavioural Brain Research 2013, 243:16-20. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.12.048.
37. Hirshorn E.A., Thompson-Schill S.L. Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in covert word retrieval: Neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(12):2547-2557. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.035.
38. Holland R., Leff A.P., Josephs O., Galea J.M., Desikan M., Price C.J., et al. Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation. Current Biology 2011, 21(16):1403-1407. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.021.
39. Iyer M., Mattu U., Grafman J., Lomarev M., Sato S., Wassermann E. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 2005, 64(5):872-875.
40. Jacobson L., Javitt D.C., Lavidor M. Activation of inhibition: Diminishing impulsive behavior by direct current stimulation over the inferior frontal gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23(11):3380-3387.
41. Jaeggi S.M., Buschkuehl M., Jonides J., Perrig W.J. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(19):6829-6833. 10.1073/pnas.0801268105.
42. Jaeggi S.M., Buschkuehl M., Jonides J., Shah P. Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108(25):10081-10086. 10.1073/pnas.1103228108.
43. January D., Trueswell J.C., Thompson-Schill S.L. Co-localization of stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in broca's area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(12):2434-2444. 10.1162/jocn.2008.21179.
44. Jo J.M., Kim Y., Ko M., Ohn S.H., Joen B., Lee K.H. Enhancing the working memory of stroke patients using tDCS. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2009, 88(5):404-409. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a0e4cb.
45. Keeser D., Padberg F., Reisinger E., Pogarell O., Kirsch V., Palm U., et al. Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. NeuroImage 2011, 55(2):644-657. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.004.
46. Keller T., Carpenter P., Just M. The neural bases of sentence comprehension: A fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11(3):223-237. 10.1093/cercor/11.3.223.
47. Kincses T., Antal A., Nitsche M., Bartfai O., Paulus W. Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(1):113-117. 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00124-6.
48. Lanyon L., Denham S. A biased competition computational model of spatial and object-based attention mediating active visual search. Neurocomputing 2004, 58:655-662. 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.01.110.
49. Larsen B., Skinhoj E., Lassen N.A. Variations in regional cortical blood flow in the right and left hemispheres during automatic speech. Brain 1978, 101:193-209. 10.1093/brain/101.2.193.
50. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21(3):451-468. 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451.
51. Leite J., Carvalho S., Fregni F., Goncalves O.F. Task-specific effects of tDCS-induced cortical excitability changes on cognitive and motor sequence set shifting performance. PLoS One 2011, 6(9):e24140. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024140.
52. Liebetanz D., Nitsche M., Tergau F., Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002, 125:2238-2247. 10.1093/brain/awf238.
53. Maris E., Womelsdorf T., Desimone R., Fries P. Rhythmic neuronal synchronization in visual cortex entails spatial phase relation diversity that is modulated by stimulation and attention. NeuroImage 2013, 74:99-116. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.007.
54. Marshalek B., Lohman D., Snow R. The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical-models of intelligence. Intelligence 1983, 7(2):107-127. 10.1016/0160-2896(83)90023-5.
55. Marshall L., Molle M., Siebner H., Born J. Bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation slows reaction time in a working memory task. BMC Neuroscience 2005, 6:23. 10.1186/1471-2202-6-23.
56. Mason R., Just M., Keller T., Carpenter P. Ambiguity in the brain: What brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 2003, 29(6):1319-1338. 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1319.
57. Miller E. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2000, 1(1):59-65. 10.1038/35036228.
58. Milner B. Some effects of frontal lobectomy in man. The frontal granular cortex and behavior 1964, 313-331. McGraw-Hill, New York. J. Warren, K. Akert (Eds.).
59. Milner B., Petrides M. Behavioral-effects of frontal-lobe lesions in man. Trends in Neurosciences 1984, 7(11):403-407. 10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80143-5.
60. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences 1983, 6:414-417.
61. Moliadze V., Antal A., Paulus W. Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes. Clinical Neurophysiology 2010, 121(12):2165-2171. 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.033.
62. Moran J., Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 1985, 229(4715):782-784. 10.1126/science.4023713.
63. Nitsche M., Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001, 57(10):1899-1901.
64. Novick J.M., Kan I.P., Trueswell J.C., Thompson-Schill S.L. A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2009, 26(6):527-567. 10.1080/02643290903519367.
65. Nozari N., Dell G.S. Feature migration in time: Reflection of selective attention on speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 2012, 38(4):1084-1090. 10.1037/a0026933.
66. Ohn S.H., Park C., Yoo W., Ko M., Choi K.P., Kim G., et al. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory. Neuroreport 2008, 19(1):43-47.
67. Oppenheim G.M., Dell G.S. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition 2008, 106(1):528-537. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006.
68. Owen A.M., Hampshire A., Grahn J.A., Stenton R., Dajani S., Burns A.S., et al. Putting brain training to the test. Nature 2010, 465(7299). (775-U6). 10.1038/nature09042.
69. Pardo J., Fox P., Raichle M. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature 1991, 349(6304):61-64. 10.1038/349061a0.
70. Perret E. The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behavior. Neuropsychologia 1974, 12:323-330. 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90047-5.
71. Petrides M., Milner B. Deficits on subject-ordered tasks after frontal-lobe and temporal-lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia 1982, 20(3):249. 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90100-2.
72. Podell K., Lovell M., Goldberg E. lateralization of frontal lobe functions. The frontal lobes and neuropsychiatric illness 2011, 83-99. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC. S.P. Salloway, P.E. Malloy, J.D. Duffy (Eds.).
73. Ptak R. The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: Action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment. Neuroscientist 2012, 18(5):502-515. 10.1177/1073858411409051.
74. Robinson A., Heaton R., Lehman R., Stilson D. The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test in detecting and localizing frontal-lobe lesions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1980, 48(5):605-614. 10.1037/0022-006X.48.5.605.
75. Robinson G., Shallice T., Bozzali M., Cipolotti L. Conceptual proposition selection and the LIFG: Neuropsychological evidence from a focal frontal group. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(6):1652-1663. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.010.
76. Robinson G., Shallice T., Cipolotti L. A failure of high level verbal response selection in progressive dynamic aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22(6):661-694. 10.1080/02643290442000239.
77. Rodd J.M., Johnsrude I.S., Davis M.H. Dissociating frontotemporal contributions to semantic ambiguity resolution in spoken sentences. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22(8):1761-1773. 10.1093/cercor/bhr252.
78. Roland E., Larsen B. Focal increase of cerebral blood-flow during stereognostic testing in man. Archives of Neurology 1976, 33(8):551-558.
79. Roland P. Metabolic measurements of the working frontal-cortex in man. Trends in Neurosciences 1984, 7(11):430-435. 10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80148-4.
80. Roland P., Skinhoj E. Extrastriate cortical areas activated during visual-discrimination in man. Brain Research 1981, 222(1):166-171. 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90953-7.
81. Roland P., Skinhoj E., Lassen N. Focal activations of human cerebral-cortex during auditory-discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology 1981, 45(6):1139-1151.
82. Rolls E.T. A biased activation theory of the cognitive and attentional modulation of emotion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:74. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00074.
83. Rosenkranz K., Nitsche M., Tergau F., Paulus W. Diminution of training-induced transient motor cortex plasticity by weak transcranial direct current stimulation in the human. Neuroscience Letters 2000, 296(1):61-63. 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01621-9.
84. Rossi S., Cappa S., Babiloni C., Pasqualetti P., Miniussi C., Carducci F., et al. Prefontal cortex in long-term memory: An "interference" approach using magnetic stimulation. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(9):948-952. 10.1038/nn0901-948.
85. Schlaug G., Nair D., Renga V., Chakrabarti A., Pascual-Leone A., Alsop D. Relating diffusion tensor imaging to Fugl-Meyer impairment scores in chronic stroke patients with incomplete recovery. Neurology 2008, 70(11):A233-A234.
86. Schwartz M.F., Faseyitan O., Kim J., Coslett H.B. The dorsal stream contribution to phonological retrieval in object naming. Brain 2012, 135:3799-3814. 10.1093/brain/aws300.
87. Shipstead Z., Redick T.S., Engle R.W. Does working memory training generalize?. Psychologica Belgica 2010, 50(3-4):245-276.
88. Sparing R., Dafotakis M., Meister I.G., Thirugnanasambandam N., Fink G.R. Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation-A transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(1):261-268. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.009.
89. Spironelli C., Angrilli A. EEG delta band as a marker of brain damage in aphasic patients after recovery of language. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(4):988-994. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.019.
90. Spironelli C., Angrilli A., Calogero A., Stegagno L. Delta EEG band as a marker of left hypofrontality for language in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2011, 37(4):757-767. 10.1093/schbul/sbp145.
91. Tanaka S., Hanakawa T., Honda M., Watanabe K. Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 196(3):459-465. 10.1007/s00221-009-1863-9.
92. Thompson-Schill S., D'Esposito M., Aguirre G., Farah M. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94(26):14792-14797. 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792.
93. Thompson-Schill S., Kan I. Relationship between response set size and prefrontal activity during verbal fluency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, (114-114).
94. Thompson-Schill S., Swick D., Farah M., D'Esposito M., Kan I., Knight R. Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 95(26):15855-15860. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15855.
95. Tomlin R.S. Focal attention, voice, and word order. Word order in discourse 1995, 517-552. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands. P. Downing, M. Noonan (Eds.).
96. Treisman A. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review 1969, 76(3):282. 10.1037/h0027242.
97. Unsworth N., Engle R. Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and raven. Intelligence 2005, 33(1):67-81. 10.1016/j.intell.2004.08.003.
98. Usher M., Niebur E. Modeling the temporal dynamics of IT neurons in visual search: A mechanism for top-down selective attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8(4):311-327. 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.311.
99. Utz K.S., Dimova V., Oppenlaender K., Kerkhoff G. Electrified minds: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology-a review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(10):2789-2810. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002.
100. Vercammen A., Rushby J.A., Loo C., Short B., Weickert C.S., Weickert T.W. Transcranial direct current stimulation influences probabilistic association learning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 2011, 131(1-3):198-205. 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.021.
101. Verguts T., De Boeck P. On the correlation between working memory capacity and performance on intelligence tests. Learning and Individual Differences 2001, 13(1):37-55. 10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00049-3.
102. Wagner A., Pare-Blagoev E., Clark J., Poldrack R. Recovering meaning: Left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron 2001, 31(2):329-338. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00359-2.
103. Whitney C., Kirk M., O'Sullivan J., Ralph M.A.L., Jefferies E. The neural organization of semantic control: TMS evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Cerebral Cortex 2011, 21(5):1066-1075. 10.1093/cercor/bhq180.
104. Winterer G., Ziller M., Dorn H., Frick K., Mulert C., Wuebben Y., et al. Frontal dysfunction in schizophrenia-A new electrophysiological classifier for research and clinical applications. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2000, 250(4):207-214. 10.1007/s004060070026.
105. Wilson F.A., Scalaidhe S.P., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Dissociation of object and spatial processing domains in primate prefrontal cortex. Science 1993, 260:1955.
106. Wirth M., Rahman R.A., Kuenecke J., Koenig T., Horn H., Sommer W., et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on behaviour and electrophysiology of language production. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(14):3989-3998. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.015.
107. Zaehle T., Sandmann P., Thorne J.D., Jaencke L., Herrmann C.S. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: Combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Bmc Neuroscience 2011, 12:2. 10.1186/1471-2202-12-2.