In search of symbolic markers: Transforming the urbanized landscape of the rotterdam rijnmond

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 2014-2034

  Dembski, Sebastian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Institutional theory; Netherlands; Port landscape; Rotterdam; Symbolic markers; Urban region; Zwischenstadt

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; LANDSCAPE; REGIONAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS; ROTTERDAM; SOUTH HOLLAND;

EID: 84886278961     PISSN: 03091317     EISSN: 14682427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01103.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Atelier Zuidvleugel (2007) Tussenruimte/In-between spaces. Atelier Zuidvleugel, Den Haag.
2. Benford, R.D. and D.A. Snow (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 611-39.
3. Berger, P.L. and T. Luckmann (1966) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
4. Bölling, L. and T. Sieverts (2004) Mitten am Rand: Auf dem Weg von der Vorstadt über die Zwischenstadt zur regionalen Stadtlandschaft [In the middle of the edge: on the way from suburbs via the Zwischenstadt towards regional urban landscape]. Müller und Busmann, Wuppertal.
5. Boudewijn, T.J., E.J.F. de Boer, R.J.W. van de Haterd and S.M. Veen (2002) Hoogwaardige natuur bij IJsselmonde: analyse van inrichtingsconcepten [High-quality nature in IJsselmonde: analysis of design concepts]. Bureau Waardenburg, Culemborg.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and symbolic power. Polity Press, Cambridge.
8. Dembski, S. and W. Salet (2010) The transformative potential of institutions: how symbolic markers can institute new social meaning in changing cities. Environment and Planning A 42.3, 611-25.
9. Doevendans, K., H. Lörzing and A. Schram (2007) From modernist landscape to new nature: planning of rural utopias in the Netherlands. Landscape Research 32.3, 333-54.
10. Friedland, R. and R.R. Alford (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
11. Gailing, L. (2007) Regionalparks als stadtregionale Entwicklungsstrategien - Interkommunale Kooperationen für die Stadtlandschaft [Regional parks: development strategies and intermunicipal cooperation for the urban landscape]. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften 46.1, 68-84. [English edition available via http://www.difu.de/node/5965]
12. Gallent, N., M. Bianconi and J. Andersson (2006) Planning on the edge: England's rural-urban fringe and the spatial-planning agenda. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33.3, 457-76.
13. Gemeente Albrandswaard (2005) Albrandswaardse Variant voor natuur en recreatie uit de PKB+PMR: lokale agenda voor het landelijke gebied ten oosten van Rhoon [Albrandswaardse Variant for nature and recreation in the PKB+PMR: local agenda for the rural area east of Rhoon]. Gemeente Albrandswaard, Albrandswaard.
14. Gemeente Rozenburg (2009) Structuurvisie 2010-2030 Rozenburg [Spatial Perspective 2010-2030 Rozenburg]. Gemeente Rozenburg, Rozenburg.
15. Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge.
16. Glasbergen, P. (2002) The green polder model: institutionalizing multi-stakeholder processes in strategic environmental decision-making. European Environment 12.6, 303-15.
17. Glasbergen, P. and P.P.J. Driessen (1993) Innovatie in het gebiedsgericht beleid: analyse en beoordeling van het ROM-gebiedenbeleid [Innovation in area-based policy: analysis and assessment of the ROM-areas policy]. Sdu, Den Haag.
18. Graham, S. and S. Marvin (2001) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, London.
19. Hajer, M. (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36.2, 175-95.
20. Hajer, M. and W. Zonneveld (2000) Spatial planning in the network society - rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies 8.3, 337-55.
21. Hajer, M., S. van 't Klooster and J. Grijzen (2010) Strong stories: how the Dutch are reinventing spatial planning. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam.
22. Hauser, S. (2007) Bilder von Städten und Regionen [Images of cities and regions]. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 12, 687-94.
23. Havenbedrijf Rotterdam (2009) Natuurlijk, Oostvoornse Meer! [Naturally, Oostvoorne Lake!] Havenbedrijf Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
24. Healey, P. (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies 14.4, 525-46.
25. Healey, P. (2007) The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning. In N. Verma (ed.), Institutions and planning, Elsevier, Oxford.
26. Hubbard, P. (1996) Urban design and city regeneration: social representations of entrepreneurial landscapes. Urban Studies 33.8, 1441-61.
27. Koomen, E., J. Dekkers and T. van Dijk (2008) Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: planning, practice and prospects. Land Use Policy 25.3, 361-77.
28. Kunzmann, K.R. (1997) The future of the city region in Europe. In K. Bosma and H. Hellinga (eds.), Mastering the city: North European city planning 1900-2000, NAi Publishers, Rotterdam.
29. Löw, M. (2008) The constitution of space: the structuration of space through the simultaneity of effect and perception. European Journal of Social Theory 11.1, 25-49.
30. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (2006) The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein and R.E. Goodin (eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Mayntz, R. and F.W. Scharpf (1995) Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus [The approach of actor-centred institutionalism]. In R. Mayntz and F.W. Scharpf (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung [Societal self-regulation and governance], Campus, Frankfurt am Main.
32. Nas, P.J.M. (1998) Introduction: congealed time, compressed place; roots and branches of urban symbolic ecology. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22.4, 545-9.
33. Ostrom, E. (1986) A method of institutional analysis. In F.X. Kaufmann, G. Majone and V. Ostrom (eds.), Guidance, control, and performance evaluation in the public sector, de Gruyter, Berlin.
34. Project Mainportontwikkeling Rotterdam (PMR) (2006) Planologische kernbeslissing Project Mainportontwikkeling Rotterdam (2006): deel 4; definitieve tekst na parlementaire instemming [Key planning decision Mainport Development Project Rotterdam (2006): part 4; definitive text after parliamentary approval]. PMR, Den Haag.
35. Provincie Zuid-Holland (PZH) (2007) Ruimte voor groen: perspectief op ontwikkeling Landschapspark Buytenland [Space for green: perspective on the development of Landscape Park Buytenland]. PZH, Amsterdam/Nijmegen/Den Haag.
36. Salet, W. (2002) Evolving institutions: an international exploration into planning and law. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22.1, 26-35.
37. Salet, W. (2009) Experimenting with new urban planning strategies under conditions of radical modernization. disP 176, 39-46.
38. Schrijnen, J. (2003) The Port of Rotterdam in a regional and supra-regional context. disP 154, 46-51.
39. Sieverts, T. (1997) Zwischenstadt: zwischen Ort und Welt, Raum und Zeit, Stadt und Land [published in 2003 as Cities without cities: an interpretation of the Zwischenstadt, Routledge, London]. Vieweg, Braunschweig.
40. Soja, E.W. (2000) Postmetropolis: critical studies of cities and regions. Blackwell, Oxford.
41. Thomas, K. and S. Littlewood (2010) From green belts to green infrastructure? The evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies. Planning, Practice and Research 25.2, 203-22.
42. Throgmorton, J. (1993) Planning as a rhetorical activity: survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal of the American Planning Association 59.3, 334-46.
43. van den Brink, A., A. van der Valk and T. van Dijk (2006) Planning and the challenges of the metropolitan landscape: innovation in the Netherlands. International Planning Studies 11.3-4, 147-65.
44. van Gils, M. and E.-H. Klijn (2007) Complexity in decision making: the case of the Rotterdam harbour expansion; connecting decisions, arenas and actors in spatial decision making. Planning Theory and Practice 8.2, 139-59.
45. van Oosten-Snoek, M. and R.J. van Leeuwen (2002) Groengebied Midden-IJsselmonde: drie inrichtingsconcepten voor het recreatiegebied [Green area Midden-IJsselmonde: three design concepts for the recreation area]. RBOI, Rotterdam.
46. Zonneveld, W. (2005) Multiple visioning: new ways of constructing transnational spatial visions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23.1, 41-62.