Futur – foresight for priority-setting in Germany

International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 183-194

  Cuhls, Kerstin ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

foresight process; leading visions; participation; priority setting; scenarios; strategies in research; technology policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886215929     PISSN: 17402816     EISSN: 17402824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijfip.2004.004958     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cuhls, K. and Kuwahara, T. (1994) Outlook for Japanese and German Future Technology, Comparing Technology Forecast Surveys, Physica publishers, Heidelberg.
2. Grupp, H. (Ed.) (1995) Der Delphi-Report, with Breiner, Sibylle and Cuhls, Kerstin, dva publishers, Stuttgart.
3. Cuhls, K., Breiner, S. and Grupp, H. (1995) Delphi-Bericht 1995 zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik – Mini–Delphi -, Karlsruhe 1995 (same as BMBF print, Bonn 1996).
4. Cuhls, K., Blind, K. and Grupp, H. (Eds.) (1998) Delphi ‘98 Umfrage. Zukunft nachgefragt. Studie zur globalen Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik, Karlsruhe.
5. Cuhls, K., Blind, K. and Grupp, H. (2001) Innovations for our Future, Physica publishers, Heidelberg.
6. National Institute for Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) (1997) The Sixth Technology Forecast Survey – Future Technology in Japan, NISTEP Report No. 52, (Tokyo 1997, original Report in Japanese: NISTEP: Dai 6 kai gijutsu yo-soku chôsa, NISTEP Report No. 52).
7. Blind, K., Cuhls, K. and Grupp, H. (1999) ‘Current foresight activities in Central Europe’, in Grupp, H. (Guest Editor) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Special Issue on National Foresight Projects, Vol. 60, No. 1, Jan., Elsevier Science, New York, pp.15–37.
8. Martin, B.R. (1985) ‘Foresight in science and technology’, in Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 7. Jg. (1995), H. 2, S. 139–168.
9. Kuhlmann, S. et al. (1999) ‘Improving distributed intelligence in complex innovation systems’, Final Report of the Advanced Science & Technology Policy Planning Network (ASTPP), ISI, Karlsruhe.
10. Cuhls, K. (2000) ‘Opening up foresight processes’, in Economies et Sociétés, Série Dynamique technologique et organisation, No. 5, pp.21–40.
11. Blind, K., Cuhls, K. and Grupp, H. (2001) ‘Personal attitude in the assessment of the future of science and technology: a factor analysis approach’, in Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 68, pp.131–149.
12. Blind, K. and Cuhls, K. (2001) ‘Der Einfluss der Expertise auf das Antwortverhalten in Delphi-Studien: Ein empirischer Test theoretischer Hypothesen’, in: ZUMA-Nachrichten, Vol. 49, November, pp.57–80.
13. Bardecki, M.J. (1984) ‘Participants’ response to the Delphi method: an attitudinal perspective’, in Technical Forecasting and Social Change, No. 24, pp.281–292.
14. Federal German Ministry for Research and Technology (Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, BMFT) (Ed.) (1993) Deutscher Delphi-Bericht zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik, Bonn.
15. Linstone, H.A. (1999) Decision Making for Technology Executives: Using Multiple Perspectives to Improve Performance, Boston, London: Artech House.
16. Nedeva, M., Georghiou, L., Loveridge, D. and Cameron, H. (1996) ‘The use of co-nomination to identify expert participants for technology foresight’, in R&D Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.155–168.
17. Buzan, T. and Buzan, B. (1993) The Mindmap Book, BBC Books, London.
18. Keenan, M. (2000) ‘An evaluation of the implementation of the UK Technology Foresight Programme’, Thesis, submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Economic and Social Studies, PREST.