D-OMAR an architecture for modeling multitask behaviors

Human Performance Modeling in Aviation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 183-212

  Deutsch, Stephen E ^a   Pew, Richard W ^a  

^a BBN TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886188324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Adams, M. J., Tenney, Y. J., & Pew, R. W. (1991). Strategic workload and the cognitive management of advanced multi-task systems. Wright Patterson AFB, OH: Crew Systems Ergonomics Information Analysis Center.
2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
3. Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking. An experimental and social study. London: George Allen & Unwin.
4. Bellenkes, A. H., Wickens, C. D., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Visual scanning and pilot expertise: The role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 68, 569–579.
5. Billings, C. E. (1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Brachman, R. J., & Schmolze, J. G. (1985). An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9, 171–216.
7. Deutsch, S. E. (2005). Reconceptualizing expertise: Explaining an expert’s error. Proceedings of the 7th Naturalistic Decision Making Conference. Amsterdam.
8. Deutsch, S. E. (1998). Interdisciplinary foundations for multiple-task human performance modeling in OMAR. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Madison, WI.
9. Deutsch, S. E., & Adams, M. J. (1995). The operator model architecture and its psychological framework. Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Man–Machine Systems. Cambridge, MA.
10. Deutsch, S. E., & Pew, R. W. (2002). Modeling human error in a real-world teamwork environment. Proceedings of the Twentieth-fourth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 274–279). Fairfax, VA.
11. Deutsch, S. E., & Pew, R. W. (2004). Examining new flightdeck technology using human performance modeling. Proceedings of the 48th Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
12. Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.
13. Edelman, G. M. (1989). The remembered present: A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
14. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.
15. Goodman, A., Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., & Wilson, J. R. (2003). Characterizing visual performance during approach and landing with and without a synthetic vision display: A part-task study. In D. C. Foyle, A. Goodman, & B. L. Hooey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Human Performance Modeling of Approach and Landing with Augmented Displays (NASA/CP-2003-212267) (pp. 71–89). Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
16. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
17. Keller, J., & Leiden, K. (2002a). Information to support the human performance modeling of a B757 flight crew during approach and landing: RNAV (Tech. Rep.). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis & Design.
18. Keller, J., & Leiden, K. (2002b). Information to support the human performance modeling of a B757 flight crew during approach and landing: SVS addendum (Tech. Rep.). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis & Design.
19. Logan, G. D. (1988a). Automaticity, resources, and memory: Theoretical controversies and practical implications. Human Factors, 30, 583–598.
20. Logan, G. D. (1988b). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
21. Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
23. NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). (1994). Aircraft accident report: A review of flightcrew-involved, major accidents of U.S. carriers, 1978 through 1990 (NTSB/SS-94/01). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. Orasanu, J., Martin, L., & Davison, J. (1998). Errors in aviation decision making: Bad decisions or bad luck? Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making. Warrenton, VA.
25. Orasanu, J. M. (1994). Shared problem models and flight crew performance. In N. McDonald, N. Johnston, & R. Fuller (Eds.), Aviation psychology in practice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
26. Pew, R. W., Miller, D. E., & Feehrer, C. E. (1981). Evaluation of proposed control room improvements through analysis of critical operator decisions. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
27. Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627–1631.
28. Rasmussen, J. (1976). Outlines of a hybrid model of the process plant operator. In T. B. Sheridan & G. Johannsen (Eds.), Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. New York: Plenum.
29. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
31. Serfaty, D., Entin, E. E., & Johnston, J. H. (1998). Team coordination training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 221–245). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Shapiro, R. (1984). FLEX: A tool for rule-based programming (BBN Rep. No. 5843). Cambridge, MA: BBN Technologies.