Evaluating Individual Change

Offence Paralleling Behaviour: A Case Formulation Approach to Offender Assessment and Intervention

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 287-302

  Davies, Jason ^a,b   Jones, Lawrence ^c   Howells, Kevin ^d  

^a Cefn Coed Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c RAMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'they may not be actual offending behaviours (OBs)'; A Framework for Outcome Assessment; Evaluating Individual Change; Individual Change in Forensic Settings; Offence Paralleling Behaviour: Special Considerations; Randomized control trial (RCT); Reliable change index (RCI)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886184729     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470970270.ch18     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bloom, M., Fischer, J. & Orme, J.G. (2006). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (5th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Daffern, M., Jones, L., Howells, K., Shine, J.,Mikton, C. & Tunbridge, V.C. (2007). Refining the definition of offence paralleling behaviour. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17, 265-73.
3. Davies, J., Howells, K. & Jones, L. (2007). Using single case approaches in personality disorder and forensic services. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 18, 353-67.
4. Department of Health (2008). Refocusing the care programme approach: policy and positive practice guidance. Retrieved on April 22, 2010 from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH083647.
5. Derogatis, L.R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Dcoring, and Procedures Manual (4th edition). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
6. Hammond, S. & O'Rourke, M. (2007). The measurement of individual change: a didactic account of an idiographic approach. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 81-95.
7. Hayes, A.M., Laurenceau, J-P. & Cardaciotto, L. (2007). Methods for capturing the process of change. In A.M. Nezu & C.M. Nezu (Eds), Evidence-Based Outcome Research: A Practical Guide to Conducting Randomized Controlled Trials for Psychosocial Interventions (pp. 335-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Jacobson,N.S. & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to definingmeaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
9. Jones, L. (2004). Offence paralleling behaviour (OPB) as a framework for assessment and intervention with offenders. In A. Needs & G.J. Towl (Eds), Applying Psychology to Forensic Practice (pp. 34-63). Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
10. Jones, L. (2007). Iatrogenic interventions with personality disordered offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 69-79.
11. Lambert, M.J. (1994). Use of psychological tests for outcome assessment. In M.E. Maruish (Ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment (pp. 75-97). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Livesley,W.J. (2003). Practical Management of Personality Disorder. NewYork: Guilford Press. Moos, R.H. (1974). Evaluating Treatment Environments: A Social Ecological Approach. New York: JohnWiley & Sons.
13. Morley, S. & Adams, M. (1989). Some simple statistical tests for exploring single-case time-series data. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 1-18.
14. Morley, S. & Adams, M. (1991). Graphical analysis of single-case time-series data. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 97-115.
15. Newman, F.L. (1994). Selection of design and statistical procedures for progress and outcome assessment. In M.E. Maruish (Ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Newman, F.L. & Ciarlo, J.A. (1994). Criteria for selecting psychological instruments for treatment outcome assessment. In M.E. Maruish (Ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. NIMHE (2008). Mental Health Outcomes Compendium. Crown Copyright. Retrieved on December 1, 2009, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/publications/PublicationsPolicyandGuidance/DH093316.
18. Ogles, B.M., Lambert, M.J. & Fields, S.A. (2002). Essentials of Outcome Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Ogles, B.M., Lambert, M.J. & Masters, K.S. (1996). Assessing Outcome in Clinical Practice. Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Ottenbacher, K.J. (1986). Evaluating Clinical Change. Baltimore, MD: Williams &Wilkins.
21. Persons, J.B. (1989). Cognitive Therapy in Practice: A Case Formulation Approach. New York: Norton.
22. Persons, J.B. (2008). The Case Formulation Approach to Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (Guides to Individualized Evidence-Based Treatment). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Petermann, F. & Muller, J.M. (2001). Clinical Psychology and Single-Case Evidence: A Practical Approach to Treatment, Planning and Evaluation. Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons.
24. Ryle, A. (1975). Frames and Cages. London: Sussex University Press.
25. Shulman, L.S. (2007). Counting and Recounting: Assessment and the Quest for Accountability. Retrieved on July 23, 2009, from http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/January-February%202007/full-counting-recounting.html.
26. Sperry,L., Brill,P.L.,Howard,K.I.&Grissom, G.R. (1996).Treatment Outcomes in Psychotherapy andPsychiatric Interventions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
27. Spielberger, C.D. (1999). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STXI-2). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
28. Turpin, G. (2001). Single case methodology and psychotherapy evaluation. In C. Mace, S. Moorey & B. Roberts (Eds), Evidence in the Psychological Therapies: A Critical Guide for Practitioners (pp. 91-113). Philadephia: Brunner-Routledge.