Regulations and Requirements

Sense and Avoid in UAS: Research and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 85-117

  Prats, Xavier ^a   Ramírez, Jorge ^a   Delgado, Luis ^a   Royo, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collision avoidance, as last resort manoeuvre; Conventional aviation regulations, safety paramount; ELOS safety representation; Flight performance; Human factors, and situational awareness; Regulations, requirements; Regulatory issues and human factors; SAA system requirements for UAS; Safety representation of TLS; UAS degree of automation, key factor in SAA capability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886162212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781119964049.ch4     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. ASTM International, "Standard Specification for Design and Performance of an Airborne Senseand- Avoid System", American Society of Testing&Materials, Document F2411-07, February 2007.
2. Dalamagkidis, K., Valavanis, K.P., Piegl, L.A., and Tzafestas, S.G. (eds), On Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System: Issues, Challenges, Operational Restrictions, Certification and Recommendations, Vol. 26 of International Series on Intelligent Systems, Control, and Automation: Science and Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009.
3. ICAO, Annex 10 to the convention on international civil aviation - Aeronautical Telecommunications. Volume IV - Surveillance radar and collision avoidance systems, 2nd edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal (Canada), 1998.
4. ICAO, Annex 2 to the convention on international civil aviation - Rules of the air, 9th edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal (Canada), 1990.
5. ICAO, Annex 11 to the convention on international civil aviation - Air traffic services, 13th edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal (Canada), 2001.
6. Eurocontrol, "Implementation of the Airspace Strategy Task Force A (IAS-TFA)", available at http://www.eurocontrol.int/airspace/public/standard/page/17111/IASTFA.html (last checked January 2011).
7. UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), CAP 722 Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace - Guidance, 2010.
8. Weibel, R.E. and Hansman, R.J., "Safety Considerations for Operation of Unmanned AerialVehicles in the National Airspace System", Technical report, MIT International Center for Air Transportation, March 2005.
9. RTCA, "Operational Services and Environmental Definition (OSED) for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Document Do-320, Washington, DC, June 2010.
10. NASA, "Potential use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for NASA science missions", National Aeronautics&Space Administration, 2006.
11. RTCA, "Guidance material and considerations for unmanned aircraft systems", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Document Do-304, Washington, DC, March 2007.
12. UAVNET, "European civil unmanned air vehicle roadmap, volumes 1 and 2", available at http://www.uavnet.com, 2005.
13. FAA, "Sense and Avoid (SAA) for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)", Federal Aviation Administration sponsored Sense and Avoid Workshop, Final report, October 2009.
14. Weaver, R.A. and Kelly, T.P., "The goal structuring notation - a safety argument notation", Dependable Systems and Networks, Proceedings of Workshop on Assurance Cases, July 2004.
15. Hayhurst, K.J., Maddalon, J.M., Miner, P.S., Szatkowski, G.N., Ulrey, M.L., DeWaltCary, M.P., and Spitzer, R., "Preliminary considerations for classifying hazards of unmanned aircraft systems", February 2007.
16. FAA, "Interim Operational Approval Guidance,08-01: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations in the U.S. National Airspace System", Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Safety Unmanned Aircraft Program Office, AIR-160, March 2008.
17. European Parliament, "Regulation (EC) No. 216/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a EuropeanAviation Safety Agency and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No. 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC", Official Journal of the European Union, February 19, 2008.
18. EASA, "Policy Statement Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)", European Aviation Safety Agency, August 2009.
19. EASA, "Acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Part 21", decision no. 2003/1/RM, October 2003.
20. Transport Canada Civil Aviation, "Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) Working Group Final Report", September 2007, available at: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/standards/general-recaviuavworkinggroup-2266.htm.
21. Transport Canada Civil Aviation, "Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV) Systems Program DesignWorking Group", March 2010, available at: http://www.h-a-c.ca/UAV_Terms_of_Reference_2010.pdf.
22. Carr, G., "Unmanned aircraft CASA regulations", Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), Australia, on-line presentation available at: http://www.uatar.com/workinggroups.html.
23. CASA, "Unmanned aircraft and rockets. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations, design specification, maintenance and training of human resources", Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Advisory Circular 101-01(0), Australia, July 2002.
24. Eurocontrol, Unmanned Aircraft Systems - ATM Collision Avoidance Requirements, Edition 1.3, May 2010.
25. Wilson, M., "A mobile aircraft tracking system in support of unmanned air vehicle operations", Proceedings of the 27th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS, Nice, France, September 2010.
26. Wolfe, R., "NASA ERAST non-cooperative DSA flight test", Proceedings of the AUVSI Unmanned Systems Conference, Baltimore, MD, July 2003.
27. Schaeffer, R.J., "Astandards-based approach to sense-and-avoid technology", AIAA 3rd "Unmanned Unlimited" Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit, Chicago, IL, September 2004, Paper AIAA 2004-6420.
28. FAA Order 8700.1, Change 3, Chapter 169, §5A.
29. Eurocontrol, "Eurocontrol specifications for the use of military unmanned aerial vehicles as operational air traffic outside segregated airspace", Document SPEC-0102, July 2007.
30. ICAO, "Annex 6 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation - Operation of Aircraft, Part I - International Commercial Air Transport - Aeroplanes", 8th edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal, Canada, 2001.
31. ICAO, "Procedures for Air Navigation Services. Aircraft Operations, Volume I - Flight Procedures", 5th edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal, Canada, 2006, Document 8168.
32. ICAO, "Procedures for Air Navigation Services. Air Traffic Management", 14th edn, International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal, Canada, 2001, Document 4444.
33. RTCA, "MOPS for traffic alert and collision avoidance system III (TCAS II) airborne equipment", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics,Washington, DC, December 1997, Document Do-185A.
34. Eurocontrol, "Review of ASAS applications studied in Europe", Technical Report, CARE/ASAS action, CARE/ASAS activity 4, February 2002, available at: http://www.eurocontrol.int/careasas/gallery/content/public/docs/act4/care-asas-a4-02-037.pdf.
35. RTCA, "Minimum operational characteristics - airport ATC transponder systems", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, October 2008, Document Do-144A.
36. RTCA, "Minimum operational performance standards (MOPS) for air traffic control radar beacon system/mode select (ATCRBS/mode S) airborne equipment", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, February 2008, Document Do-181D.
37. RTCA, "MOPS for 1090 MHz extended squitter automatic dependent surveillance - broadcast (ADS-B) and traffic information services - broadcast (TIS-B)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, February 2009, Document Do-260B.
38. RTCA, "MOPS for universal access transceiver (UAT) automatic dependent surveillance - broadcast (ADS-B)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, February 2009, Document Do-282B.
39. RTCA, "Minimum aviation system performance standards for (MASPS) for automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, June 2002, Document Do-242A.
40. RTCA, "MOPS for an active traffic alert and collision avoidance system I (Active TCAS I)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, December 1994, Document Do-197A.
41. FAA, "Technical Standard Order (TSO) C147, Traffic advisory system (TAS) airborne equipment", Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, Aircraft Certification Service, Washington, DC, April 1998.
42. SAE, Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems, Society of Automotive Engineers, Standard ARP4754-A, December 2010.
43. RTCA, "Guidance for initial implementation of cockpit display of traffic information", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, February 1998, Document Do-243.
44. RTCA, "Applications descriptions for initial cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI) applications", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics,Washington, DC, September 2000, Document Do-259.
45. RTCA, "Minimum aviation system performance standards (MASPS) for aircraft surveillance applications (ASA)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, September 2003, Document Do-289.
46. RTCA, "Development and implementation planning guide for automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B) applications", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, June 1999, Document Do-249.
47. RTCA, "Minimum aviation system performance standards (MASPS) for traffic information service - broadcast (TIS-B)", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics,Washington, DC, October 2007, Document Do-286B.
48. RTCA, "Interchange standards for terrain, obstacle, and aerodrome mapping", Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, Washington, DC, February 2009, Document Do-291A.
49. Gonzalez, L.-F., Australian Research Centre of Aerospace Automation. Unmanned Aircraft Systems, the Global Perspective 2009/2008, 2007, pp. 17-18.