Measuring the benefits of delayed price-responsive demand in reducing wind-uncertainty costs

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 4118-4126

  Madaeni, Seyed Hossein ^a,b   Sioshansi, Ramteen ^a  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

^b PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Power system economics; Real time pricing; Unit commitment; Wind forecast errors; Wind power generation

Indexed keywords

EFFECT OF DELAYS; PERFECT FORESIGHTS; POWER SYSTEM ECONOMICS; REAL TIME PRICING; SYSTEM CONDITIONS; UNIT COMMITMENT; WIND FORECASTS; WIND UNCERTAINTIES;

ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; WEATHER FORECASTING; WIND POWER;

COSTS;

EID: 84886096842     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2258689     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. E. A. DeMeo, W. Grant, M. R. Milligan, and M. J. Schuerger, "Wind plant integration," IEEE Power and Energy Mag., vol. 3, pp. 38-46, Nov.-Dec. 2005.
2. J. C. Smith, M. R. Milligan, E. A. DeMeo, and B. Parsons, "Utility wind integration and operating impact state of the art," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 900-908, Aug. 2007.
3. E. A. DeMeo, G. A. Jordan, C. Kalich, J. King, M. R. Milligan, C. Murley, B. Oakleaf, and M. J. Schuerger, "Accommodating wind's natural behavior," IEEE Power and Energy Mag., vol. 5, pp. 59-67, Nov.-Dec. 2007.
4. A. Papavasiliou and S. S. Oren, "Coupling wind generators with deferrable loads," in Proc. Energy 2030 Conf. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Atlanta, GA, USA, Nov. 17-18, 2008.
5. M. Klobasa, "Analysis of demand response and wind integration in Germany's electricity market," IET Renew. Power Gen., vol. 4, pp. 55-63, Jan. 2010.
6. R. Sioshansi, "Evaluating the impacts of real-time pricing on the cost and value of wind generation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 741-748, May 2010.
7. K. Dietrich, J. M. Latorre, L. Olmos, and A. Ramos, "Demand response in an isolated system with high wind integration," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 20-29, Feb. 2012.
8. C. De Jonghe, B. F. Hobbs, and R. Belmans, "Optimal generation mix with short-term demand response and wind penetration," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 830-839, May 2012.
9. F. Bouffard and F. D. Galiana, "Stochastic security for operations planning with significant wind power generation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 306-316, May 2008.
10. J. García-González, R. M. R. de la Muela, L. M. Santos, and A. M. González, "Stochastic joint optimization of wind generation and pumped-storage units in an electricity market," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 460-468, May 2008.
11. A. Tuohy, P. Meibom, E. Denny, and M. O'Malley, "Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 592-601, May 2009.
12. S. H. Madaeni and R. Sioshansi, "The impacts of stochastic programming and demand response on wind integration," Energy Syst., vol. 4, pp. 109-124, Jun. 2013.
13. Western Wind and Solar Integration Study National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Tech. Rep.NREL/SR-550-47434, 2010.
14. P. A. Ruiz, C. R. Philbrick, E. Zak, K. W. Cheung, and P. W. Sauer, "Uncertainty management in the unit commitment problem," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 642-651, May 2009.
15. A. Papavasiliou, S. S. Oren, and R. P. O'Neill, "Reserve requirements for wind power integration: A scenario-based stochastic programming framework," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2197-2206, Nov. 2011.
16. R. P. O'Neill, P. M. Sotkiewicz, B. F. Hobbs, M. H. Rothkopf, and W. R. Stewart, "Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 164, pp. 269-285, Jul. 2005.
17. C. W. Potter, D. Lew, J. McCaa, S. Cheng, S. Eichelberger, and E. Grimit, "Creating the dataset for the western wind and solar integration study (U.S.A.)," Wind Eng., vol. 32, pp. 325-338, Jun. 2008.
18. C. Loutan and D. Hawkins, Integration of Renewable Resources California Independent System Operator, Tech. Rep., 2007.
19. Y. V. Makarov, P. V. Etingov, J. Ma, Z. Huang, and K. Subbarao, "Incorporating uncertainty of wind power generation forecast into power system operation, dispatch, and unit commitment procedures," IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 2, pp. 433-442, Oct. 2011.
20. S. Borenstein, J. B. Bushnell, and C. R. Knittel, A Cournot-Nash Equilibrium Analysis of the New Jersey Electricity Market, New Jersey Board of PublicUtilities Appendix A of Review of General Public Utilities Restructuring Petition, Final Report docket Number EA97060396, 1997.
21. R. Sioshansi andW. Short, "Evaluating the impacts of real-time pricing on the usage of wind generation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 516-524, May 2009.
22. S. H. Madaeni and R. Sioshansi, "Using demand response to improve the emission benefits of wind," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1385-1394, May 2013.
23. S. Borenstein and S. P. Holland, "On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices," RAND J. Econ., vol. 36, pp. 469-493, Autumn, 2005.
24. C. S. King and S. Chatterjee, "Predicting California demand response," Public Util. Fortnight., pp. 27-32, Jul. 2003.
25. A. Fabbri, T. G. S Román, J. R. Abbad, and V. H.M. Quezada, "Assessment of the cost associated with wind generation prediction errors in a liberalized electricity market," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1440-1446, Aug. 2005.
26. P. Denholm and R. M. Margolis, "Evaluating the limit of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems," Energy Policy, vol. 35, pp. 2852-2861, 2007.