Clinical implications of none - Contrast- Enhanced computed tomography for follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1042-1048

  Bobadilla, Joseph Louis ^a   Suwanabol, Pasithorn A ^a   Reeder, Scott B ^b   Pozniak, Myron A ^b   Bley, Thorsten A ^b   Tefera, Girma ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SCREENING; AORTA RUPTURE; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EVALUATION STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84886096475     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: 16155947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1437-44.
2. Lederle FA. Screening for AAA in the USA. Scand J Surg 2008;97:139-41.
3. Brewster DC, Jones JE, Chung TK, et al. Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade. Ann Surg 2006;244:426-38.
4. Desai M, Eaton-Evans J, Hillery C, et al. AAA stent-grafts: past problems and future prospects. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:1259-75.
5. White GH, Yu W, May J, Chaufour X, Stephen MS. Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:152-68.
6. Wain RA, Marin ML, Ohki T, et al. Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:69-78.
7. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1048-60.
8. White HA, Macdonald S. Estimating risk associated with radiation exposure during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2010;51: 95-104.
9. Gray C, Goodman P, Herron CC, et al. Use of colour duplex ultrasound as a first line surveillance tool following EVAR is associated with a reduction in cost without compromising accuracy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;44:145-50.
10. Iezzi R, Cotroneo AR, Giammarino A, Spigonardo F, Storto ML. Low-dose multidetector-row CT-angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. Eur J Radiol 2009;79:21-8.
11. Laks S, Macari M, Chandarana H. Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the aorta after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2010;31:292-300.
12. Numburi UD, Schoenhagen P, Flamm SD, et al. Feasibility of dual-energy CT in the arterial phase: Imaging after endovascular aortic repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195: 486-93.
13. Go MR, Barbato JE, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS. What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients? J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1181-6.
14. Dias NV, Riva L, Ivancev K, Resch T, Sonesson B, Malina M. Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:425-30.
15. Springer F, Gunther RW, Schmitz-Rode T. Aneurysm sac pressure measurement with minimally invasive implantable pressure sensors: an alternative to current surveillance regimes after EVAR? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008;31: 460-7.
16. Bley TA, Chase PJ, Reeder SB, et al. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: nonenhanced volumetric CT for follow-up. Radiology 2009;253:253-62.
17. Rozenblit AM, Patlas M, Rosenbaum AT, et al. Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. Radiology 2003;227:426-33.
18. Huppmann MV, Johnson WB, Javitt MC. Radiation risks from exposure to chest computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2010;31:14-28.
19. Mayo J.R. Radiation dose issues in longitudinal studies involving computed tomography. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:934-9.
20. Caldwell DP, Pulfer KA, Jaggi GR, Knuteson HL, Fine JP, Pozniak MA. Aortic aneurysm volume calculation: effect of operator experience. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:259-62.
21. Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS. Clinical practice. Preventing nephropathy induced by contrast medium. N Engl J Med 2006;354:379-86.
22. Laville M, Juillard L. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: how should at-risk patients be identified and managed? J Nephrol 2010;23:387-98.