Measurement of blood perfusion in spinal metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Evaluation of tumor response to radiation therapy

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 22, 2013, Pages

  Chu, Stacy ^a   Karimi, Sasan ^a   Peck, Kyung K ^a   Yamada, Yoshiya ^a   Lis, Eric ^a   Lyo, John ^a   Bilsky, Mark ^a   Holodny, Andrei I ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

dynamic contrastenhanced (DCE) MRI; perfusion; permeability; plasma volume.; radiotherapy; spinal metastases

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE METASTASIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PLASMA VOLUME; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIMARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE METASTASIS; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL NEOPLASMS; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84886091782     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a40838     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Togawa D, Lewandrowski K-U. The pathophysiology of spinal metastases. In: McLain R, Lewandrowski K-U, Markman M, et al. eds. Current Clinical Oncology: Cancer in the Spine: Comprehensive Care. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc.; 2006: 17-23.
2. Traill Z, Richards MA, Moore NR. Magnetic resonance imaging of metastatic bone disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;312: 76-88.
3. Biffar A, Dietrich O, Sourbron S, et al. Diffusion and perfusion imaging of bone marrow. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76: 323-328.
4. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI, Knapp PH, et al. Effect of radiation therapy on thoracic and lumbar bone marrow: evaluation with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 87-92.
5. Otake S, Mayr NA, Ueda T, et al. Radiation-induced changes in MR signal intensity and contrast enhancement of lumbosacral vertebrae: do changes occur only inside the radiation therapy field? Radiology 2002; 222: 179-83. (Pubitemid 34031485)
6. Koo KH, Dussault R, Kaplan P, et al. Age-related marrow conversion in the proximal metaphysis of the femur: evaluation with T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1998; 206: 745-8. (Pubitemid 28128524)
7. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal bone marrow. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 471-83. (Pubitemid 28468457)
8. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffus-able tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 223-32. (Pubitemid 29463104)
9. Dyke JP, Aaron RK. Noninvasive methods of measuring bone blood perfusion. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1192: 95-102.
10. Hylton N. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3293-8. (Pubitemid 46622069)
11. Chen WT, Shih TT, Chen RC, et al. Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI: in comparison with compression fracture and metastasis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 308-14. (Pubitemid 34195127)
12. Pauliah M, Saxena V, Haris M, et al. Improved T(1)-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to probe microvascularity and heterogeneity of human glioma. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1292-9. (Pubitemid 47625925)
13. Moehler TM, Hawighorst H, Neben K, et al. Bone marrow microcirculation analysis in multiple myeloma by contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cancer 2001; 93: 862-8. (Pubitemid 32756756)
14. Baur A, Stabler A, Bartl R, et al. MRI gadolinium enhancement of bone marrow: age-related changes in normals and in diffuse neo-plastic infiltration. Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26: 414-8. (Pubitemid 27338910)
15. Cova M, Kang YS, Tsukamoto H, et al. Bone marrow perfusion evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic fast MR imaging in a dog model. Radiology 1991;179: 535-9.
16. Shih TT, Liu HC, Chang CJ, et al. Correlation of MR lumbar spine bone marrow perfusion with bone mineral density in female subjects. Radiology 2004; 233: 121-8. (Pubitemid 39280966)
17. Northam M, de Campos RO, Ramalho M, et al. Bone metastases: evaluation of acuity of lesions using dynamic gadolinium-chelate enhancement, preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 120-7.
18. Dyke JP. Perfusion imaging. In: Holodny A, ed. Functional Neuro-imaging: A Clinical Approach. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare USA, Inc; 2008: 249-72.
19. Lee JH, Dyke JP, Ballon D, et al. Subchondral fl uid dynamics in a model of osteoarthritis: use of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 1350-5.
20. Daldrup-Link HE, Link TM, Rummeny EJ, et al. Assessing permeability alterations of the blood-bone marrow barrier due to total body irradiation: in vivo quantification with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 71-8. (Pubitemid 30093159)