CO2 Emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: Evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break

Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 229-235

  Yavuz, N Çil ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

CO2 emission; environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis; structural break

Indexed keywords

CO-INTEGRATION TESTS; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE HYPOTHESIS; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; PER CAPITA; PER CAPITA INCOME; STRUCTURAL BREAK;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY UTILIZATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84886061116     PISSN: 15567249     EISSN: 15567257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567249.2011.567222     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., and, Evans, J. M. 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. J. R. Stat. Soc., 37: 149-192.
2. Engle, R. F., and, Granger, C. W. J. 1987. Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55: 251-276.
3. Gregory, A. W., and, Hansen, B. E. 1996. Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J. Econometrics, 70: 99-126. (Pubitemid 126339817)
4. Grossmann, G. M., and, Krueger, A. B. Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914.
5. Grossmann, G. M., and, Krueger, A. B. 1993. " Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. ". In The Mexico-US Free Trade Agreement Edited by: Garber, P. 13-56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Grossmann, G. M., and, Krueger, A. B. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ., 110: 353-377. (Pubitemid 26430080)
7. Hansen, B. E. 1992. Tests for parameter stability in regressions with I(1) processes. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 10: 321-335.
8. Johansen, S. 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 12: 231-254.
9. Johansen, S. 1991. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59: 1551-1580.
10. Narayan, P. K., and, Narayan, S. 2010. Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energ. Policy, 38: 661-666.
11. Perron, P. 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57: 1361-1401.
12. Phillips, P. C. B., and, Hansen, B. E. 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev. Econ. Stud., 57: 99-125.
13. Richmond, A. K., and, Kaufmann, R. K. 2006. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions. Ecol. Econ., 56: 176-189. (Pubitemid 43207603)
14. Soytaş, U., and, Sari, R. 2009. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecol. Econ., 68: 1667-1675.
15. Soytaş, U., Sari, R., and, Ewing, B. T. 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol. Econ., 62: 482-489. (Pubitemid 46670710)
16. Zivot, E., and, Andrews, D. W. K. 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 10: 251-270.