Perceived usefulness of data entry tools in medical encounters: A survey

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Celikkan, Ufuk ^a   Sahin, Yasar Guneri ^a   Senuzun, Fisun ^b  

^a IZMIR UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Data Entry Methods; Electronic Health Record (EHR); Physicians' Productivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; YOUNG ADULT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEVICES; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; TURKEY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TURKEY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84886005038     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-013-9988-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pizziferri, L., Kittler, A. F., Volk, L. A., Honour, M. M., Gupta, S., Wang, S., et al., Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: A time-motion study. J Biomed Inform 38(3):176-88, 2005.
2. Hier, D. B., Rothschild, A., LeMaistre, A., and Keeler, J., Differing faculty and house staff acceptance of an electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 74(7/8):657-62, 2005.
3. Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. (2006) National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, Summary Division of Health Care Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr003.pdf. Accessed 19 Jun 2013.
4. Grumbach, K., and Fry, J., Managing primary care in United States and in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med 328:940-5, 1993.
5. Ohtaki, S., Ohtaki, T., and Fetters, M. D., Doctor-patient communication: a comparison of the USA and Japan. Fam Pract 20(3):276-82, 2003.
6. DPT of Turkish Republic, Türkiye'de SaǧlIk Eǧitimi ve SaǧlIk İnsangücü Durum Raporu, Ankara (2010) www.yok.gov.tr/index.php?option = com-docman&task = doc. Accessed 19 June 2013.
7. Northouse PG, Northouse LL. Health communication. Strategies for health professionals. 2. ed. Washington: Appleton: Lange 322-34, 1992.
8. Clayton PD, Narus SP, Bowes III WA, Madsen TS, Wilcox AB, Orsmond G, et al. Physician use of electronic medical records: Issues and successes with direct data entry and physician productivity. In: AMIA Annu Symp Proc 141-5, 2005.
9. Sahin, Y. G., and Celikkan, U., MEDWISE: an innovative public health information system infrastructure. J Med Syst 36(3):1719-39, 2012.
10. Ventres, W., Kooienga, S., Vuckovic, N., Marlin, R., Nygren, P., and Stewart, V., Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med 4(2):124-31, 2006.
11. Bloom, M. V., and Huntington, M. K., Faculty, resident, and clinic Staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation. Fam Med 42(8):562-6, 2010.
12. Frankel, R., Altschuler, A., George, S., Kinsman, J., Jimison, H., Robertson, N. R., et al., Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 20(8):677-82, 2005.
13. Ash, J. S., and Bates, D. W., Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 12(1):8-12, 2004.
14. Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Tsurikova R, Melnikas AJ, Volk LA, Middleton B. Barriers to Electronic Health Record Use during Patient Visits. In: AMIA Annu Symp Proc 499-503, 2006
15. Weber, J., Tomorrow's transcription tools: what new technology means for healthcare. J AHIMA 74(3):39-43, 2003.
16. Aviv, S., and Shmuel, R., The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. J Eval Clin Prac 15(4):641-9, 2009.
17. Han, S., Harkke, V., Mustonen, P., Seppanen, M., and Kallio, M., Understanding physician acceptance of mobile technology: insights from two telephone interviews in Finland. Int J Electron Healthc 1(4):380-95, 2005.
18. Hayrinen, K., Saranto, K., and Nykanen, P., Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 77(5):291-304, 2008.
19. Seckman CA, Romano CA, Marden S. Evaluation of clinician response to wireless technology. In: AMIA Annu Symp Proc 612-6, 2001.
20. Pilcher, J. W., and Bedford, L., Willingness and preferences of nurses related to learning with technology. J Nurses Staff Dev 27(3):10-16, 2001.
21. Bahlol, R., and Vivian, V., Methods to evaluate health information systems in healthcare settings: A literature review. J Med Syst 31(5):397-432, 2007.
22. Goddard, A. F., Hodgson, H., and Newbery, N., Impact of EWTD on patient:doctor ratios and working practices for junior doctors in England and Wales 2009. J R Coll Physicians 10(4):330-5, 2010.
23. Bernhard J, Butow P, Aldridge J, Juraskova I, Ribi K, Brown R. Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes?. J Psychosoc Onco doi: 10.1002/pon.2044, 2011.
24. Piper AM, Hollan JD. Supporting medical communication for older patients with a shared touch-screen computer. Int J Med Inform doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf. 2011.03.005, 2011.
25. Levick, D., Lukens, H. F., and Stillman, P. L., You've led the horse to water, now how do you get him to drink: managing change and increasing utilization of computerized provider order entry. J Healthc Inf Manag 19(1):70-5, 2005.
26. Alghamdi KM, Moussa NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information, Int J Med Inform doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.12. 004, 2011.