Between compromise and consensus in group decisions in forest management

Sumarski List

Volumn 137, Issue 7-8, 2013, Pages 403-410

  Grošelj, Petra ^a   Zadnik Stirn, Lidija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Compromise; Consensus; Forest management; Group decision making; Multi criteria decision making; Pohorje; Slovenia

Indexed keywords

COMPROMISE; CONSENSUS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; POHORJE; SLOVENIA;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; REGIONAL PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; STAKEHOLDER; TIMBER;

CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT;

SLOVENIA;

EID: 84885993794     PISSN: 03731332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ananda, J., Herath, G., 2009: A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning, Ecological Economics, 68: 2535-2548.
2. Arnstein, S. R., 1969: A Ladder Of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35: 216-224.
3. Brumec, D., Rozman, C., Janžekovic, M., Turk, J., Celan, S., 2013: An assessment of diflerent scenarios for agroforestry environment regulation of degraded land using integrated simulation and a multi-criteria decision model-A case study, Šumarski list, 3-4: 147-161.
4. Dyer, R. F., Forman, E. H., 1992: Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Decision Support Systems, 8: 99-124.
5. Forman, E., Peniwati, K., 1998: Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 108: 165-169. (Pubitemid 128372596)
6. Hartmann, S., Martini, C., Sprenger, J., 2009: Consensual Decision-Making among Epistemic Peers, Episteme, 6: 110-129.
7. Hiltunen, V., Kurttila, M., Leskinen, P., Pasanen, K., Pykäläinen, J., 2009: Mesta: An internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning, Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 1-9.
8. Kangas, J., Kangas, A., 2005: Multiple criteria decision support in forest management-The approach, methods applied, and experiences gained, Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 133-143. (Pubitemid 40306896)
9. Lešnik Štuhec, T., Gulic, J., 2010: Porocilo o opravljenih SWOT analizah na podrocjih gozdarstva, kmetijstva in turizma na Pohorju, projekt: NATREG, Available at: www.zrsvn.si/dokumenti/64/2/2010/141010-SWOT-TLS- JGk-2125.pdf.
10. Macpherson, H., 2004, Participation, Practitioners and Power: Community Participation in North East Community Forests, 64 p., Newcastle upon Tyne.
11. Menzel, S., Nordström, E.-M., Buchecker, M., Marques, A., Saarikoski, H., Kangas, A., 2010: Between ethics and technology-evaluation criteria for the development of appropriate DSS in the context of participatory planning, In: Falcao, A. O.,Rosset, C. (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Decision Support Systems in Sustainable Forest Management, University of Lisbon, 6 p., Lisbon.
12. Mianabadi, H., Afshar, A., Zarghami, M., 2011: Intelligent multi -stakeholder environmental management, Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 862-866.
13. NATREG, 2011: NATREG-Managing Natural Assets and Protected Areas as Sustainable Regional Development Opportunities Ljubljana.
14. Nordström, E.-M., 2010: Integrating Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis into Participatory Forest Planning, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 70 p., Umea.
15. Nose Marolt, M., Lešnik Štuhec, T., 2010, Stanje gozdov in divjadi ter gozdarstva in lovstva na projektnem obmocju Pohorje, Predstavitev strokovne študije in SWOT analiza-Porocilo, 12 p., Pohorje.
16. Pezdevšek Malovrh, S., Grošelj, P., Zadnik Stirn, L., Krc, J., 2012: The Present State and Prospects of Slovenian Private Forest Owners' Cooperation within Machinery Rings, Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 33: 105-114.
17. Reed, M. S., 2008: Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review, Biological Conservation, 141: 2417-2431.
18. Rowe, G., Frewer, L. J., 2000: Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation, Science, Technology & Human Values, 25: 3-29.
19. Saaty, T. L., 1980: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 287 p., New York.
20. Saaty, T. L., Peniwati, K., 2008: Group decision making: Drawing out and reconciling diflerences, RWS Publications, 385 p., Pittsburgh, PA.
21. Sheppard, S. R. J., Meitner, M., 2005: Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups, Forest Ecology and Management, 207: 171-187. (Pubitemid 40306899)
22. Steele, K., Regan, H. M., Colyvan, M., Burgman, M. A., 2007: Right Decisions or Happy Decision-makers?, Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 21: 349-368.
23. Urataric, N., Marega, M., 2010: Porocilo z zakljucne delavnice za izdelavo analize SWOT in oblikovanje elementov vizije, projekt: NATREG, Available at: www.natreg.eu/pohorje/uploads/./Porocilo-SWOTinVIZIJA-2124(1).pdf.
24. Wijnmalen, D. J. D., 2007: Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46: 892-905. (Pubitemid 47302250)
25. Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., 2008: Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework, Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 1-10. (Pubitemid 351597868)
26. Wolfslehner, B., Seidl, R., 2010: Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management, Environmental Management, 46: 850-861.