Round robin performance testing of organic photovoltaic devices

Renewable Energy

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 376-387

  Gevorgyan, Suren A ^a   Zubillaga, Oihana ^b   de Seoane, José María Vega ^b   Machado, Maider ^b   Parlak, Elif Alturk ^c   Tore, Nesrin ^c   Voroshazi, Eszter ^d   Aernouts, Tom ^d   Müllejans, Harald ^e   Bardizza, Giorgio ^e   Taylor, Nigel ^e   Verhees, Wiljan ^f   Kroon, Jan M ^f   Morvillo, Pasquale ^g   Minarini, Carla ^g   Roca, Francesco ^g   Castro, Fernando A ^h   Cros, Stéphane ⁱ   Lechêne, Balthazar ⁱ   Trigo, Juan F ^j   Guillén, Cecilia ^j   Herrero, Jose ^j   Zimmermann, Birger ^k   Sapkota, Subarna Babu ^k   Veit, Clemens ^k   Würfel, Uli ^k   Tuladhar, Pabitra S ^l   Durrant, James R ^l   Winter, Stefan ^m   Rousu, Sanna ⁿ   Välimäki, Marja ⁿ   Hinrichs, Volker ^o   Cowan, Sarah R ^p   Olson, Dana C ^p   Sommer Larsen, Peter ^a   Krebs, Frederik C ^a   more..

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b TECNALIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION   (Spain)

^c NATIONAL METROLOGY INSTITUTE   (Turkey)

^d IMEC   (Belgium)

^e JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^f Solliance   (Netherlands)

^g ENEA   (Italy)

^h NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CEA DRT/LITEN/DTS/LMPV   (France)

^j CIEMAT   (Spain)

^k FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS ISE   (Germany)

^l IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^m PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

ⁿ VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^o HAHN MEITNER INSTITUT   (Germany)

^p NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

I V characterization; Intercomparability; Organic photovoltaic; Round robin; Standard testing conditions

Indexed keywords

INTERCOMPARABILITY; IV CHARACTERIZATION; ORGANIC PHOTOVOLTAICS; ROUND ROBIN; STANDARD TESTING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; LABORATORIES; SILICON SOLAR CELLS;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; ROUTERS;

FUEL CELL; LABORATORY METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RESEARCH WORK; SOLAR POWER; TESTING METHOD; ALGORITHM;

EID: 84885977006     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.034     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. http://www.sophia-ri.eu.
2. http://www.eera-set.eu/.
3. Ossenbrink H., Krebs K., Steenwinckel R.V. Results of the 1984/1985 international round robin calibration summit working group on technology, growth and employment 1985, 943-944. IEEE.
4. Metzdorf J., Wittchen T., Heidler K., Dehne K., Shimokawa R., Nagamine F., et al. Objectives and results of the PEP'87 round-robin calibration of reference cells and modules. Proceedings of the 21st IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference 1990, 952-959. IEEE, Orlando, FL.
5. Metzdorf J., Wittchen T., Heidler K., Dehne K., Shimokawa R., Nagamine F., et al. The results of the PEP'87 round-robin calibration of reference cells and modules November 1990, Final Report, PTB Technical Report PTB-Opt-31, Braunschweig, Germany.
6. Osterwald C.R., Anevsky S., Barua A.K., Dubard J., Emery K., King D., et al. Results of the PEP'93 intercomparison of reference cell calibrations and newer technology performance measurements. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference 1996, 1263-1266. IEEE, Washington, DC.
7. Osterwald C.R. Results of 1992 ASTM cell and module measurement intercomparison 1993, vol. 1:1102-1106. IEEE.
8. Osterwald C.R., Anevsky S., Bücher K., Barua A.K., Chaudhuri P., Dubard J., et al. The world photovoltaic scale: an international reference cell calibration program. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 1999, 7:287-297.
9. Betts T.R., Gottschalg R., Infield D.G., Kolodenny W., Prorok M., Zdanowicz T., et al. Round robin comparison of European outdoor measurement systems. Proceedings of the 21st European photovoltaic solar energy conference, 4-8 September 2006, 2447-2451.
10. Herrmann W., Mau S., Fabero F., Betts T., van der Borg N., Kiefer K., et al. Advanced intercomparison testing of PV modules in European test laboratories. Proceedings of the 22nd European photovoltaic solar energy conference, 3-7 September 2007, 2506-2510.
11. Krebs F.C., Gevorgyan S.A., Gholamkhass B., Holdcroft S., Schlenker C., Thompson M.E., et al. Around robin study of flexible large-area roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cell modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2009, 93:1968-1977.
12. Gevorgyan S.A., Medford A.J., Bundgaard E., Sapkota S.B., Schleiermacher H.F., Zimmermann B., et al. An inter-laboratory stability study of roll-to-roll coated flexible polymer solar modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2011, 95:1398-1416.
13. Søndergaard R.R., Makris T., Lianos P., Manor A., Katz E.A., Gong W., et al. The use of polyurethane as encapsulating method for polymer solar cells - an inter laboratory study on outdoor stability in 8 countries. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2012, 99:292-300.
14. Rösch R., Tanenbaum D.M., Jørgensen M., Seeland M., Bärenklau M., Hermenau M., et al. Investigation of the degradation mechanisms of a variety of organic photovoltaic devices by combination of imaging techniques-the ISOS-3 inter-laboratory collaboration. Energy Environ Sci 2012, 5:6521-6540.
15. Andreasen B., Tanenbaum D.M., Hermenau M., Voroshazi E., Lloyd M.T., Galagan Y., et al. TOF-SIMS investigation of degradation pathways occurring in a variety of organic photovoltaic devices - the ISOS-3 inter-laboratory collaboration. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2012, 14:11780-11799.
16. Tanenbaum D.M., Hermenau M., Voroshazi E., Lloyd M.T., Galagan Y., Zimmermann B., et al. The ISOS-3 inter-laboratory collaboration focused on the stability of a variety of organic photovoltaic devices. RSC Adv 2012, 2:882-893.
17. Teran-Escobar G., Tanenbaum D.M., Voroshazi E., Hermenau M., Norrman K., Lloyd M.T., et al. On the stability of a variety of organic photovoltaic devices by IPCE and in situ IPCE analyses - the ISOS-3 inter-laboratory collaboration. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2012, 14:11824-11845.
18. Larsen-Olsen T.T., Machui F., Lechene B., Berny S., Angmo D., Søndergaard R., et al. Round-robin studies as a method for testing and validating high-efficiency ITO-free polymer solar cells based on roll-to-roll-coated highly conductive and transparent flexible substrates. Adv Energy Mater 2012, 2:1091-1094.
19. Angmo D., Gonzalez-Valls I., Veenstra S., Verhees W., Sapkota S., Schiefer S., et al. Low-cost upscaling compatibility of five different ITO-free architectures for polymer solar cells. J Appl Polymer Sci 2013, 130:944-954.
20. Lilliedal M.R., Medford A.J., Madsen M.V., Norrman K., Krebs F.C. The effect of post-processing treatments on inflection points in current-voltage curves of roll-to-roll processed polymer photovoltaics. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2010, 94:2018-2031.
21. Reese M.O., Nardes A.M., Rupert B.L., Larsen R.E., Olson D.C., Lloyd M.T., et al. Photoinduced degradation of polymer and polymer-fullerene active layers: experiment and theory. Adv Funct Mater 2010, 20:3476-3483.