A cross-architectural interface for code cache manipulation

Proceedings of the CGO 2006 - The 4th International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 17-27

  Hazelwood, Kim ^a   Cohn, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINARY TRANSFORMATION; CACHE REPLACEMENT POLICY; DYNAMIC INSTRUMENTATION; OPEN SOURCE TOOLS; RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE; RUN-TIME ACCESS; SOFTWARE CODE CACHES; STANDARD DISTRIBUTIONS;

INSTRUMENTS; NETWORK COMPONENTS; OPTIMIZATION; TOOLS;

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API);

EID: 84885962819     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CGO.2006.3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. E. R. Altman, M. Gschwind, S. Sathaye, S. Kosonocky, A. Bright, J. Fritz, P. Ledak, D. Appenzeller, C. Agricola, and Z. Filan. BOA: The architecture of a binary translation processor. IBM Research Report RC 21665, December 2000.
2. M. Arnold, S. Fink, D. Grove, M. Hind, and P. F. Sweeney. Adaptive optimization in the Jalapeno JVM. In 15th Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 47-65, 2000.
3. M. Arnold and B. Ryder. A framework for reducing the cost of instrumented code. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 168-179, 2001.
4. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald, and S. Banerjia. Dynamo: A transparent dynamic optimization system. In ACMConference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 1-12, 2000.
5. L. Baraz, T. Devor, O. Etzion, S. Goldenberg, A. Skaletsky, Y. Wang, and Y. Zemach. IA-32 execution layer: a two-phase dynamic translator designed to support ia-32 applications on itanium-based systems. In 36th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 191-201, December 2003.
6. D. Bruening and S. Amarasinghe. Maintaining consistency and bounding capacity of software code caches. In 3rd International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, March 2005.
7. D. Bruening, T. Garnett, and S. Amarasinghe. An infrastructure for adaptive dynamic optimization. In First International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 265-275, March 2003.
8. B. Buck and J. K. Hollingsworth. An API for runtime code patching. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 14(4): 317-329, Winter 2000.
9. B. Cantrill, M. W. Shapiro, and A. H. Leventhal. Dynamic instrumentation of production systems. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 15-28, 2004.
10. H. Chen, J. Lu, W. Hsu, and P.-C. Yew. Continuous adaptive object-code re-optimization framework. In Ninth Asia- Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference, pages 241-255, 2004.
11. R. Cohn and R. Muth. Pin 2.0 user guide, July 2004.
12. J. C. Dehnert, B. K. Grant, J. P. Banning, R. Johnson, T. Kistler, A. Klaiber, and J. Mattson. The transmeta code morphing software: Using speculation, recovery, and adaptive retranslation to address real-life challenges. In First International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 15-24, March 2003.
13. G. Desoli, N. Mateev, E. Duesterwald, P. Faraboschi, and J. A. Fisher. Deli: A new run-time control point. In 35th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 257-268, 2002.
14. E. Duesterwald and V. Bala. Software profiling for hot path prediction: Less is more. In 12th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 202-211, October 2000.
15. K. Ebcioglu and E. Altman. DAISY: Dynamic compilation for 100% architectural compatibility. In 24th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 26-37, June 1997.
16. K. Hazelwood and J. E. Smith. Exploring code cache eviction granularities in dynamic optimization systems. In 2nd International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 89-99, Palo Alto, CA, March 2004.
17. K. Hazelwood and M. D. Smith. Code cache management schemes for dynamic optimizers. In 6th Workshop on Interaction between Compilers and Computer Architectures, pages 102-110, February 2002.
18. K. Hazelwood and M. D. Smith. Generational cache management of code traces in dynamic optimization systems. In 36th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 169-179, San Diego, CA, December 2003.
19. M. Hirzel and T. Chilimbi. Bursty tracing: A framework for low-overhead temporal profiling. In 4th ACM Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-4), December 2001.
20. G. Hunt and D. Brubacher. Detours: Binary interception of win32 functions. In 3rd USENIX Windows NT Symposium, pages 135-143, Seattle, WA, July 1999.
21. C.-K. Luk, R. Cohn, R. Muth, H. Patil, A. Klauser, G. Lowney, S. Wallace, V. Janapareddi, and K. Hazelwood. Pin: Building customized program analysis tools with dynamic instrumentation. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, Chicago, IL, June 2005.
22. N. Nethercote and J. Seward. Valgrind: A program supervision framework. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 89(2), 2003.
23. M. Paleczny, C. Vick, and C. Click. The java hotspot server compiler. In Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium (JVM '01), pages 1-12, April 2001.
24. H. Pan, K. Asanovic, R. Cohn, and C.-K. Luk. Controlling program execution through binary instrumentation. In Workshop on Binary Instrumentation and Applications (WBIA- 2005), September 2005.
25. K. Scott, N. Kumar, S. Velusamy, B. Childers, J. W. Davidson, and M. L. Soffa. Retargetable and reconfigurable software dynamic translation. In First International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 36-47, March 2003.
26. A. Srivastava, A. Edwards, and H. Vo. Vulcan: Binary transformation in a distributed environment. Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-50, Microsoft Research, 2001.