The case for fencing remains intact

Ecology Letters

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Packer, C ^a   Swanson, A ^a   Canney, S ^b   Loveridge, A ^b   Garnett, S ^c   Pfeifer, M ^d   Burton, A C ^e   Bauer, H ^b   Macnulty, D ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^f UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carrying capacity; Edge effects; Fences; Lions; Population size

Indexed keywords

CARRYING CAPACITY; EDGE EFFECT; FELID; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION SIZE; PREDATOR; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CARNIVORA; CARRYING CAPACITY; EDGE EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FENCES; HUMAN; LION; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION SIZE;

CARRYING CAPACITY; EDGE EFFECTS; FENCES; LIONS; POPULATION SIZE;

ANIMALS; CARNIVORA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; HUMANS; LIONS; POPULATION DENSITY;

EID: 84885961550     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12171     Document Type: Article

References (1)

1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2013). World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.227, New York.