Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in salpingectomized compared with nonsalpingectomized women with tubal factor infertility and women with unexplained infertility

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1297-1303

  Grynnerup, Anna G A ^a,b   Lindhard, Anette ^a   Sørensen, Steen ^b  

^a Copenhagen University Hospital Roskilde ^*  (Denmark)

^b HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anti M llerian hormone; fertilization in vitro; ovarian reserve; salpingectomy; sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

MUELLERIAN INHIBITING FACTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HORMONE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALPINGECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUBAL FACTOR INFERTILITY;

ANTI-MÜLLERIAN HORMONE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; OVARIAN RESERVE; SALPINGECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; OOCYTES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SALPINGECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84885949716     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12234     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Evers JL,. Female subfertility. Lancet. 2002; 360: 151-9.
2. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG,. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978; 2: 366.
3. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisand I, et al. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1243-9.
4. Strandell A, Lindhard A,. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1141-5.
5. Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW,. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; CD002125.
6. Celik HG, Dogan E, Okyay E, Ulukus C, Saatli B, Uysal S, et al. Effect of laparoscopic excision of endometriomas on ovarian reserve: serial changes in the serum antimüllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 1472-8.
7. Nardo LG, Christodoulou D, Gould D, Roberts SA, Fitzgerald CT, Laing I,. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count in women enrolled in in vitro fertilization cycles: relationship to lifestyle factors, chronological age and reproductive history. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007; 23: 486-93.
8. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update. 2010; 16: 113-30.
9. Broer SL, Eijkemans MJ, Scheffer GJ, van Rooij IA, de Vet A, Themmen AP, et al. Anti-müllerian hormone predicts menopause: a long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 2532-9.
10. Appt SE, Clarkson TB, Chen H, Adams MR, Christian PJ, Hoyer PB, et al. Serum antimüllerian hormone predicts ovarian reserve in a monkey model. Menopause. 2009; 16: 597-601.
11. Kevenaar ME, Meerasahib MF, Kramer P, van de Lang-Born BM, de Jong FH, Groome NP, et al. Serum anti-müllerian hormone levels reflect the size of the primordial follicle pool in mice. Endocrinology. 2006; 147: 3228-34.
12. Broer SL, Mol B, Dolleman M, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ,. The role of anti-Müllerian hormone assessment in assisted reproductive technology outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 22: 193-201.
13. Wang JG, Douglas NC, Nakhuda GS, Choi JM, Park SJ, Thornton MH, et al. The association between anti-Müllerian hormone and IVF pregnancy outcomes is influenced by age. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 21: 757-61.
14. Overbeek A, Broekmans FJ, Hehenkamp WJ, Wijdeveld ME, van Disseldorp J, van Dulmen-den Broeder E,. Intra-cycle fluctuations of anti-Müllerian hormone in normal women with a regular cycle: a re-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012; 24: 664-9.
15. Bungum L, Jacobsson AK, Rosen F, Becker C, Yding Andersen C, Guner N, et al. Circadian variation in concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone in regularly menstruating females: relation to age, gonadotrophin and sex steroid levels. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 678-84.
16. Lindhard A, Ravn V, Bentin-Ley U, Horn T, Bangsboell S, Rex S, et al. Ultrasound characteristics and histological dating of the endometrium in a natural cycle in infertile women compared with fertile controls. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 1344-55.
17. Grynnerup A, Lindhard A, Sorensen S,. The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in female fertility and infertility-an overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 1252-60.
18. Bredkjaer HE, Ziebe S, Hamid B, Zhou Y, Loft A, Lindhard A, et al. Delivery rates after in-vitro fertilization following bilateral salpingectomy due to hydrosalpinges: a case control study. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 101-5.
19. Verhulst G, Vandersteen N, van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P,. Bilateral salpingectomy does not compromise ovarian stimulation in an in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 624-8.
20. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Brison DR, Lieberman BA,. Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85: 1464-8.
21. Lass A, Ellenbogen A, Croucher C, Trew G, Margara R, Becattini C, et al. Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to superovulation in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 1035-8.
22. Chan CC, Ng EH, Li CF, Ho PC,. Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 2175-80.
23. Orvieto R, Saar-Ryss B, Morgante G, Gemer O, Anteby EY, Meltcer S,. Does salpingectomy affect the ipsilateral ovarian response to gonadotropin during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles? Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 1842-4.
24. Tal J, Paltieli Y, Korobotchka R, Ziskind G, Eibschitz I, Ohel G,. Ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in repeated IVF cycles after unilateral salpingectomy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002; 19: 451-5.
25. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U, Thorburn J,. Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 1135-9.
26. Dar P, Sachs GS, Strassburger D, Bukovsky I, Arieli S,. Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 142-4.
27. Almog B, Wagman I, Bibi G, Raz Y, Azem F, Groutz A, et al. Effects of salpingectomy on ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization: a reappraisal. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 2474-6.
28. Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Lee BI, Suh CS, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 343-9.
29. Ercan CM, Duru NK, Karasahin KE, Coksuer H, Dede M, Baser I,. Ultrasonographic evaluation and anti-müllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic stripping of unilateral endometriomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 158: 280-4.
30. Kitajima M, Khan KN, Hiraki K, Inoue T, Fujishita A, Masuzaki H,. Changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels may predict damage to residual normal ovarian tissue after laparoscopic surgery for women with ovarian endometrioma. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 2589-e1.
31. Ni L, Sadiq S, Mao Y, Cui Y, Wang W, Liu J,. Influence of various tubal surgeries to serum antimüllerian hormone level and outcome of the subsequent IVF-ET treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013; 29: 345-9.