Experimental and simulation results for biomethane production using peek hollow fiber membrane

Fuel

Volumn 112, Issue , 2013, Pages 489-493

  Molino, A ^a   Nanna, F ^a   Migliori, M ^b   Iovane, P ^a   Ding, Y ^c   Bikson, B ^c  

^a ENEA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^c PoroGen Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Biomethane; Landfill gas; Organic waste

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN; POLYMERS; WASTES;

BIOGAS UPGRADING; BIOMETHANE; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANES; INDUSTRIAL SEPARATION; LANDFILL GAS; MEMBRANE PURIFICATION; ORGANIC WASTES; POLYMERIC HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

EID: 84885949438     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.046     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Persson M, Jonsson O, Wellinger A. Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid injection iea bioenergy task 37. Energy Biogas Landfill Gas 2006.
2. Richard W, Lokhandawa B. Natural gas processig with membranes: an overview. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008; 47: 2109-21.
3. Liyuan D, Hagg M. Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading process using CO2 facilitated transport membrane. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010; 4: 638-46.
4. Sridhar S, Smitha B, Aminabhavi TM. Separation of carbon dioxide from natural gas mixtures through polymeric membranes: a review. Sep Purif Rev 2007; 36(2): 113-74. (Pubitemid 46868514)
5. Biernat K, Samson-Brek I. Review of technology for cleaning biogas to natural gas pipeline quality. CHEMIK 2011; 65(5): 435-44.
6. IEA task 37 Project biogasmax. Biogas as vehicle fuel - market expansion to 2020 air quality report on technological applicabilità of existing biogas upgrading processes; 2007.
7. Treloar RD. Gas installation technology. Blackwell; 2005. p. 24.
8. Lancia A, Musmarra D, Pepe F, Prisciandaro M. Model of oxygen absorption into calcium sulfite solutions. Chem Eng J 1997; 66: 123-9.
9. Karatza D, Lancia A, Musmarra D, Pepe F, Volpicelli G. Kinetics of adsorption of mercuric chloride vapors on sulfur impregnated activated carbon. Combust Sci Technol 1996; 112: 163-74. (Pubitemid 126543385)
10. Ohya H, Kudryavsev VV, Semenova SI. Polyimide membranes: applications, fabrications, and properties. New York: CRC Press; 1997.
11. Makaruk A, Miltner M, Harasek M. Membrane biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas substitute. Sep Purif Tech 2010; 92. 74,83.
12. Ding Y, Bikson B. Preparation and characterization of semi-crystalline poly(ether ether ketone) hollow fiber membranes". J Membr Sci 2010; 357: 192-8.
13. Molino A, Migliori M, Ding Y, Bikson B, Giordano G, Braccio G. Biogas upgrading via membrane process: modelling of pilot plant scale and the end uses for the grid injection. Fuel 2013; 107: 585-92.
14. Giglia S, Bikson B, Perrin JE. Mathematical and experimental analysis of gas separation by hollow fiber membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 1991; 30: 1239.
15. Singh A, Smyth B, Murphy J. A biofuel strategy for Ireland with an enphasis on production of biomethane and minimization of land-take. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010; 14: 277-88.
16. Singh A, Nizami N, Korres J. The effect of reactor design on the sustainability of grass biomethane. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2011; 15: 1567-74.)