Outcome of very low birth weight infants with abnormal antenatal doppler flow patterns: A prospective cohort study

Indian Pediatrics

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 847-852

  Lakshmi, C V S ^a   Pramod, G ^a   Geeta, K ^b   Subramaniam, S ^a   Rao, Marepalli B ^c   Kallapur, Suhas G ^d   Murki, S ^a  

^a Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology   (India)

^b Andhra Pradesh India   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

India; Intrauterine growth restriction; Outcome; Pre eclampsia; Prognosis

Indexed keywords

ABSENT REVERSED END DIASTOLIC FLOW; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD DEATH; CHILD GROWTH; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC PERIVENTRICULAR LEUKOMALACIA; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ENCEPHALOMALACIA; FEMALE; FORWARD END DIASTOLIC FLOW; HIGH RISK INFANT; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORTALITY; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL DISORDER; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; RISK ASSESSMENT; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMANS; INDIA; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MALE; PREGNANCY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UMBILICAL ARTERIES;

EID: 84885944018     PISSN: 00196061     EISSN: 09747559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13312-013-0235-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brodsky D, Christou H. Current concepts in intrauterine growth restriction. J Intensive Care Med. 2004;19:307-19.
2. Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR). J Perinat Med. 2008;36:277-81.
3. Bang AT, Baitule SB, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, Bang RA. Low birth weight and preterm neonates: Can they be managed at home by mother and a trained village health worker? J Perinatol. 2005;25:S72-81.
4. Figueras F, Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: New concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011
5. Baschat AA, Viscardi RM, Hussey-Gardner B, Hashmi N, Harman C. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:44-50.
6. Schreuder AM, McDonnell M, Gaffney G, Johnson A, Hope PL. Outcome at school age following antenatal detection of absent or reversed end diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86:F108-14.
7. Torrance HL, Bloemen MC, Mulder EJ, Nikkels PG, Derks JB, et al. Predictors of outcome at 2 years of age after early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:171-7.
8. Valcamonico A, Accorsi P, Sanzeni C, Martelli P, La Boria P, et al. Mid- and long-term outcome of extremely low birth weight (elbw) infants: An analysis of prognostic factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:465-71.
9. Devendra A, Sadhana D, Prem S, Prema K. Significance of umbilical artery doppler velocimetry in the perinatal outcome of growth restricted fetuses. J Obst Gynaec India. 2005;55:138-43
10. Malhotra N, Chanana C, Kumar S, Roy K, Sharma JB. Comparision of perinatal outcomes of growth-restricted fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Indian J Med Sci. 2006;60:311-7.
11. Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Macguire ER, Kamath BD, Jobe AH. Lessons for low-income regions following the reduction in hypertension-related maternal mortality in high-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113:91-5.
12. Gravett MG, Rubens CE, Nunes TM. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (2 of 7): Discovery science. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:S2.
13. Suresh S, Thangavel G. Mathemetical modeling of fetal growth, Part I: data collection and descrtiptive statistics. IJMU. 2003;3;35-41.
14. Amiel-Tison C, Ellison P. Birth asphyxia in the fullterm newborn: Early assessment and outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986;28:671-82.
15. Yoon BH, Lee CM, Kim SW. An abnormal umbilical artery waveform: A strong and independent predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;71:713-21.
16. Deshmukh A, Neelu S, Suneeta G. Significance of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the perinatal outcome of the growth restricted babies. J Obst Gynaec India. 2010;l60:38-43.
17. Bora A, Mukhopadhyay K, Saxena AK, Jain V, Narang A. Prediction of feed intolerance and necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with absent end diastolic flow in umbilical artery and the correlation of feed intolerance with postnatal superior mesenteric artery flow.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1092-6.
18. Kostovic I, Judas M. Prolonged coexistence of transient and permanent circuitry elements in the developing cerebral cortex of fetuses and preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:388-93.
19. Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the growth restriction intervention trial (grit): Multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:513-20.
20. Walker DM, Marlow N, Upstone L, Gross H, Hornbuckle J, et al. The growth restriction intervention trial: Longterm outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:31-39.
21. Spinillo A, Montanari L, Bergante C, Gaia G, Chiara A, et al. Prognostic value of umbilical artery doppler studies in unselected preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:613-20.
22. Kirsten GF, Van Zyl JI, Van Zijl F, Maritz JS, Odendaal HJ. Infants of women with severe early pre-eclampsia: The effect of absent end-diastolic umbilical artery doppler flow velocities on neurodevelopmental outcome. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89:566-70.
23. Baschat AA, Odibo AO. Timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction and childhood development: Some uncertainties remain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:2- 3.
24. Walker DM, Marlow N. Neurocognitive outcome following fetal growth restriction. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F322-5.
25. GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: Short term outcomes and bayesian interpretation. BJOG. 2003;110:27-32.