Scientific issues on effective development of marine shale gas in Southern China

Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Exploration and Development

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 574-579

  Wang, Hongyan ^a,b,c   Liu, Yuzhang ^a,b   Dong, Dazhong ^b   Zhao, Qun ^a,b,c   Du, Dong ^b  

^a State Experiment Center of Shale Gas R and D   (China)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT   (China)

^c Unconventional Oil and Gas Key Laboratory of Petrochina   (China)

Author keywords

Effective development; Marine shale gas; Nano pore; Scientific issue; Southern China

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT; MARINE SHALES; MECHANICAL MECHANISMS; QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERIZATION; RECOVERABLE RESOURCE; SCIENTIFIC ISSUES; SINGLE WELL PRODUCTION; SOUTHERN CHINA;

COMPLEX NETWORKS; FRACTURE; GASES; MECHANISMS; NANOPORES; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; PORE SIZE; WELL DRILLING;

SHALE;

EID: 84885896504     PISSN: 10000747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11698/PED.2013.05.09     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Curtis J B. Fractured shale-gas system [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1921-1938.
2. U S Energy Information Administration. Short-term energy outlook (STEO) [R]. Washington D C: EIA, 2013.
3. Wang Hongyan, Li Jingming, Zhao Qun, et al. Resources and development of new energy in China [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(3): 469-473.
4. Liang Chao, Jiang Zaixing, Yang Yiting, et al. Characteristics of shale lithofacies and reservoir space of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6): 691-698.
5. Zou Caineng, Li Jianzhong, Dong Dazhong, et al. Abundant nano-sized pores are first found in the shale gas reservoirs of China [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(5): insert page.
6. Huang Changwu. Theoretical methodology and technical system for shale reservoir fracturing [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4): 443.
7. Zhao Haifeng, Chen Mian, Jin Yan, et al. Rock fracture kinetics of the fracture mesh system in shale gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4): 465-470.
8. Zhang Shicheng, Mou Songru, Cui Yong, et al. Numerical simulation models with hydraulic fracturing in shale gas reservoirs [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(12): 81-84.
9. Zhang Xuefen, Lu Xiancai, Zhang Linye, et al. Occurrences of shale gas and their petroleum geological significance [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2010, 25(6): 597-604.
10. Singh P. Lithofacies and sequence stratigraphic framework of the Barnett Shale, Northeast Texas [D]. Oklahoma: The University of Oklahoma, 2008.
11. Jarvie D M, Hill R J, Ruble T E, et al. Unconventional shale gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale gas assessment [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 475-499.
12. Rickman R, Mullen M, Petre E, et al. A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale [R]. SPE 115258, 2008.
13. Grieser B, Halliburton J B. Identification of production potential in unconventional reservoirs [R]. SPE 106623, 2008.
14. Javadpour F, Fisher D, Unsworth M. Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments [J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2007, 46(10): 55-61.
15. Wang F P, Reed R M, John A, et al. Pore networks and fluid flow in gas shales [R]. SPE 124253, 2009.
16. 2 storage [R]. SPE 126620, 2009.
17. Freeman C M, Moridis G, Ilk D, et al. A numerical study of performance for tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems [R]. SPE 124961, 2011.
18. Yan Cunzhang, Huang Yuzhen, Ge Chunmei, et al. Enormous potential of unconventional natural gas resources [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5): 1-6.
19. King G E. Thirty years of gas shale fracturing: What have we learned? [R]. SPE 133456, 2010.
20. Paktinat J, Pinkhouse J A, Johnson N, et al. Case study: Optimizing hydraulic fracturing performance in northeastern United States fractured shale formations [R]. SPE 104306, 2006.
21. Gaurav A, Dao E K, Mohanty K K. Ultra light weight proppants for shale gas fracturing [R]. SPE 138319, 2010.
22. Gatens J M. A method for analyzing production data to estimate reservoir properties and stimulation effectiveness [D]. Texas: Texas A & M University, 1987.
23. Carlson E S. Characterization of Devonian shale gas reservoirs using coordinated single well analytical models [R]. SPE 29199, 1994.
24. Hasan A H A. A triple-porosity model for fractured horizontal wells [D]. Texas: Texas A & M University, 2010.
25. Craig J, Grigo D, Rebora A, et al. From Neoproterozoic to early Cenozoic: Exploring the potential of older and deeper hydrocarbon plays across north Africa and the Middle East [J]. Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 2010, 7(1): 673-705.
26. Economides M J, Wang X. Differences and similarities in the stimulation and production of shale gas reservoirs and other tight formations [R]. SPE 137718, 2010.
27. Fazelipour W. Innovative reservoir modeling and simulation of unconventional shale gas reservoirs powered by microseismic Data [R]. SPE 141877, 2011.