Weak process models for attack detection in a clustered sensor network using mobile agents

Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

Volumn 24 LNICST, Issue , 2010, Pages 33-50

  Pugliese, Marco ^a   Giani, Annarita ^b   Santucci, Fortunato ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alarm generation; Anomaly detection; Threat identification; Weak process models

Indexed keywords

AGENT BASED; ALARM GENERATION; ANOMALY DETECTION; ATTACK DETECTION; CLUSTERED SENSOR NETWORKS; DESIGN APPROACHES; DETECTION TECHNIQUE; FINAL STATE; HIGH POTENTIAL; INCOMING TRAFFIC; INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS; NON-PARAMETRIC; PROCESS MODEL; REACHABILITY; STATE TRANSITION PROBABILITIES; THREAT IDENTIFICATION; WEAK PROCESS MODELS;

ALARM SYSTEMS; HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS; INTRUSION DETECTION; NETWORK LAYERS; SENSORS; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

MOBILE AGENTS;

EID: 84885891780     PISSN: 18678211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11528-8_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Roosta, T., Shieh, S., Sastry, S.: Taxonomy of security attacks in sensor networks. In: First IEEE International Conference on System Integration and Reliability Improvements, Hanoi, Vietnam, vol. 1, pp. 529-536 (2006)
2. Debar, H., Dacier, M., Wespi, A.: Towards a Taxonomy of Intrusion-Detection Systems. Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking 31(9), 805-822 (1999)
3. Forney, G.: The Viterbi Algorithm. Proc. IEEE 61(3), 268-278 (1973)
4. Pugliese, M., Giani, A., Santucci, F.: A Weak Process Approach to Anomaly Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: First International Workshop on Sensor Networks (SN 2008), Virgin Islands (2008)
5. Ephraim, Y., Merhav, N.: Hidden Markov Processes. IEEE Trans. Informormation Theory 48(6) (2002)
6. Loo, C., Ng, M., Leckie, C., Palaniswami, M.: Intrusion Detection for Routing Attacks in Sensor Networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks (2005)
7. Doumit, S., Agrawal, D.: Self Organized Critically and Stochastic Learning Based Intrusion Detection System for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Military Communications Conference, MILCOM (2003)
8. Jiang, G.: Robust process detection using nonparametric weak models. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems 10 (2005)
9. Yin, Q., Shen, L., Zhang, R., Li, X.,Wang, H.: Intrusion Detection Based on Hidden Markov Model. In: International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 5, pp. 3115-3118 (2003)
10. Khanna, R., Liu, H.: System Approach to Intrusion Detection Using Hidden Markov Model. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing, vol. 5, pp. 349-354 (2006) (Pubitemid 46645220)
11. Sheng, Y., Cybenko, G.: Distance Measures for Nonparametric Weak Process Models. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 722-727 (2005) (Pubitemid 41674964)
12. Giani, A.: Detection of Attacks on Cognitive Channels. Ph.D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA (2006)
13. Silva, A., Martins, M., Rocha, B., Loureiro, A., Ruiz, L., Wong, H.: Decentralized Intrusion Detection in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Quality of service and security in wireless and mobile Networks (2005)
14. Karlof, C., Wagner, D.: Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: Attacks and countermeasures. In: 1st IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, vol. 10 (2003)
15. Rabiner, L., Juang, B.: An Introduction to Hidden Markov Models. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4-16 (1986)
16. http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos2.x/doc
17. Pugliese, M., Santucci, F.: Pair-wise Network Topology Authenticated Hybrid Cryptographic Keys for Wireless Sensor Networks using Vector Algebra. In: 4th IEEE InternationalWorkshop onWireless Sensor Networks Security (WSNS 2008), Atlanta (2008)
18. Whitman, M., Mattord, H.: Principles of Information Security, 3rd edn. Thomson (2009)
19. Ross, A.: Security Engineering. Wiley, New York (2001)
20. Baker, Z., Prasanna, V.: Computationally-efficient engine for flexible intrusion detection (2005)
21. Dainotti, A., Pescape, A., Rossi, P., Palmieri, F., Ventre, G.: Internet Traffic modeling by means of Hidden Markov Models. Computer Networks 54, 2645-2662 (2008)
22. Al-Subaie, M., Zulkernine, M.: Efficacy of Hidden Markov Models Over Neural Networks in Anomaly Intrusion Detection. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), vol. 1, pp. 325-332 (2006) (Pubitemid 46661664)
23. Wang, W., Guan, X., Zhang, X.: Modeling program behaviors by hidden Markov models for intrusion detection. In: Proceedings of 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 5, pp. 2830-2835 (2004)
24. Luk, M., Mezzour, G., Perrig, A., Gligor, V.: MiniSec: A Secure Sensor Network Communication Architecture. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) (April 2007)
25. Hu, Y., Perrig, A., Johnson, D.: Packet Leashes: A Defense against Wormhole Attacks in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2003 (2003)
26. Law, Y., Havinga, P., Johnson, D.: How to Secure a Wireless Sensor Network. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference (2005)
27. Ngai, E., Liu, J., Lyu, M.: On the Intruder Detection for Sinkhole Attack in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2006 (2006)
28. Krontiris, I., Dimitriou, T., Giannetsos, T., Mpasoukos, M.: Intrusion Detection of Sinkhole Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects ofWireless Sensor Networks, AlgoSensors 2007 (2007)
29. Dallas, D., Leckie, C., Ramamohanarao, K.: Hop-Count Monitoring: Detecting Sinkhole Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON 2007 (2007)
30. Brust, M.R., Andronache, A., Rothkugel, S., Benenson, Z.: Topology-based Clusterhead Candidate Selection in Wireless Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware, COMSWARE 2007, pp. 1-8 (2007)
31. Fok, C.-L., Roman, G.C., Lu, C.: Agilla: A Mobile Agent Middleware for Sensor Networks. Tech. Report, Washington University in St. Louis, WUCSE-2006-16 (2006)
32. Balasubramainyan, J., Garcia-Fernandez, J.O., Isacoff, D., Spafford, E., Zamboni, D.: An architecture of Intrusion Detection using Autonomous Agents, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University TR 98-05 (1998)
33. Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Abu Bakar, K.: A Novel Hybrid Mobile Agent Based Distributed Intrusion Detection System. Proc. of World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology 35 (November 2008)
34. Ramachandran, G., Hart, D.: A P2P Intrusion Detection System based on Mobile Agents. ACM, New York (2004)
35. Zhou, C.V., Karunasekera, S., Leckie, C.: A Peer-to-eer Collaborative Intrusion Detection System. In: Proc. of 13th IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2005 (2005)