Assessing sensitivity to well leakage from three years of continuous reservoir pressure monitoring during CO2 injection at Cranfield, MS, USA

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 18, Issue , 2013, Pages 439-448

  Meckel, T A ^a   Zeidouni, M ^a   Hovorka, S D ^a   Hosseini, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

CCS; Cranfield; Monitoring; Pressure; Transient

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS; DIGITAL STORAGE; MONITORING; PRESSURE; TIME SERIES; TRANSIENTS;

CHARACTERISTIC PRESSURES; CONTINUOUS RESERVOIRS; CRANFIELD; NUMERICAL FLOW MODELS; OBSERVATIONAL DATA; PRESSURE PERTURBATION; RESERVOIR PRESSURES; RESERVOIR PROPERTY;

TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 84885838900     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Avci C.B. Evaluation of flow leakage through abandoned wells and boreholes. Water Resources Research 1994, 30:2565-2578.
2. 2 storage in deep saline aquifers: a sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3(2):181-194.
3. Bourdet D., Ayoub J.A., Pirard Y.M. Use of pressure derivative in well test interpretation. Society of Petroleum Engineers Formation Evaluation 1989, 4(2):293-302.
4. 2 and brine leakage along old wells. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:257-269.
5. Chapuis R.P., Chenaf D. Detecting a hydraulic short circuit along an observation well with the recovery curve of a pumping test in a confined aquifer: method and example. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1998, 35(7):790-800.
6. 2 sequestration in the teapot dome EOR pilot: geomechanical site characterization. Environmental Geology 2008, 54(8):1667-1675.
7. Gasda S.E., Nordbotten J.M., Celia M.A. Determining effective wellbore permeability from a field pressure test: a numerical analysis of detection limits. Environmental Geology 2008, 54(6):1207-1215.
8. Gringarten A.C. From straight lines to deconvolution: the evolution of the state of the art in well test analysis. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 2008, 11(1):41-62.
9. Horne R.N. Modern well test analysis - a computer-aided approach 1995, Petroway Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp. 79-81. 2nd ed.
10. Hosseini S.A., Nicot J.P. Far-field numerical modeling of a multiphase water-oil-CO2 system with a water-CO2 system: accepted. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013, 10:88-99.
11. Javandel I., Tsang C.F., Witherspoon P.A., Morganwalp D. Hydrologic detection of abandoned wells near proposed injection wells for hazardous-waste disposal. Water Resources Research 1988, 24:261-270.
12. Katz D.L., Coats K.H. Underground storage of fluids 1968, Ulrich's Books Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, p. 575.
13. Kuchuk, F., 2009. Radius of investigation for reserve estimation from pressure transient well tests. Paper SPE 120515, SPE Middle East oil and gas show and conference, Bahrain, 15-18 March.
14. Kuchuk F., Onur M., Hollaender F. Pressure transient formation and well testing: convolution, deconvolution and nonlinear estimation 2010, Elsevier Publications, The Netherlands.
15. Mancini E.A., Mink R.M., Payton J.W., Bearden B.L. Environments of deposition and petroleum geology of the Tuscaloosa Group (Upper Cretaceous), South Carlton and Pollard fields, southwestern Alabama. AAPG Bulletin 1987, 73(10):1128-1142.
16. 2 injection in brine aquifers. Transparent Porous Media 2009, 79(2):265-284. doi:10.1007/s11242-008-9316-7.
17. 2 into closed and open brine aquifers. Water Resources Research 2011, 47:11. W12525. 10.1029/2011WR011051.
18. 2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization 2009.
19. 2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: an example from the texas gulf coast basin. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(4):593-982.
20. 2 leakage through an abandoned well. Environmental Science and Technology 2005, 39:602-611.
21. Theis C.V. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground water storage. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 1935, 16:519-524.
22. 2 storage capacities. The Leading Edge 2008, 27(4):502-505.
23. Werren E.G., Shew R.D., Adams E.R., Stancliffe R.J. Meander-belt reservoir geology, Mid-dip Tuscaloosa, Little Creek Field, Mississippi. Sandstone Petroleum Reservoirs 1990, Springer-Verlag, 583 p. J.H. Barwis, J.G. McPherson, R.J. Studlick (Eds.).
24. 2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:626-638.