One-year clinical outcomes in invasive treatment strategies for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in elderly patients

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 235-241

  Yoo, Yeon Pyo ^a   Kang, Ki Woon ^b   Yoon, Hyeon Soo ^c   Myung, Jin Cheol ^b   Choi, Yu Jeong ^b   Kim, Won Ho ^b   Park, Sang Hyun ^b   Jung, Kyung Tae ^b   Jeong, Myung Ho ^d  

^a Hyosung General Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Eulji University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Division of Cardiology   (South Korea)

^d Division of Cardiology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Elderly patients

Indexed keywords

ABCIXIMAB; ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; HEPARIN; TENECTEPLASE;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BARE METAL STENT; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; GERIATRIC DISORDER; HUMAN; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PACEMAKER; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84885755722     PISSN: 16715411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 2007; 115: 2570-2589.
2. Smith SC Jr., Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr., et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 216-235.
3. Kern MJ, Deligonul U, Galan K, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in octogenarians. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 457-458.
4. Tomassini F, Gagnor A, Migliardi A, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: predictors of long-term survival. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 505-511.
5. Mick MJ, Simpfendorfer C, Arnold AZ, et al. Early and late results of coronary angioplasty and bypass in octogenarians. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1316-1320.
6. Stenestrand U, Wallentin L. Fibrinolytic therapy in patients 75 years and older with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: one-year follow-up of a large prospective cohort. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 965-971.
7. Prasad A, Lennon RJ, Rihal CS, et al. Outcomes of elderly patients with cardiogenic shock treated with early percutaneous revascularization. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 1066-1070.
8. Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1607-1621.
9. Dzavik V, Steeper LA, Cocke TP, et al. Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 828-837.
10. Bueno H, Betriu A, Heras M, et al. Primary angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis in very old patients with acute myocardial infarction: TRIANA (TRatamiento del Infarto Agudo de miocardio eN Ancianos) randomized trial and pooled analysis with previous studies. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 51-60.
11. Newell MC, Henry TD. Primary PCI in the elderly: 75 may be the new 55! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 79: 57-58.
12. de Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van 't Hof AW, et al. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1723-1728.
13. Berger AK, Radford MJ, Wang Y, et al. Thrombolytic therapy in older patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 366-374.
14. Gasior M, Slonka G, Wilczek K, et al. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive treatment strategies in older patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes - PL-ACS). Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 30-36.
15. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Comparison of impact of emergency percutaneous revascularization on outcome of patients > or =75 to those < 75 years of age with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 1458-1461, A6.