Use of modern contraception increases when more methods become available: Analysis of evidence from 1982-2009

Global Health Science and Practice

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 203-212

  Ross, John ^a   Stover, John ^b  

^a Palladium Group   (United States)

^b AVENIR HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885732926     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2169575X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00010     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ross J, Smith E. Trends in national family planning programs, 1999, 2004 and 2009. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;37(3):125-133.
2. Jain AK. Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services. Stud Fam Plann. 1989;20(1):1-16.
3. Potter RG. Inadequacy of a one-method family planning program. Stud Fam Plann. 1971;2(1):1-6.
4. Ross J, Hardee K, Mumford E, Eid S. Contraceptive method choice in developing countries. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2002;28(1):32-40.
5. Wang W, Wang S, Pullum T, Ametepi P. How family planning supply and the service environment affect contraceptive use: findings from four East African Countries. Calverton, MD: ICF International; 2012. DHS Analytical Studies No. 26. Available from: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/AS26/AS26.pdf
6. Freedman R, Berelson B. The record of family planning programs. Stud Fam Plann. 1976;7(1):1-40. Medline
7. MEASURE DHS STATcompiler [Internet]. Calverton, MD: ICF International. 1985 - [cited 2013 Jun. 26]. Available from: http://www.statcompiler.com
8. United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2011. New York: UN; 2011. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htm
9. Jain AK, Ross JA. Fertility differences among developing countries: are they still related to family planning program efforts and social settings? Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38(1):15-22.
10. Ross J, Stover J, Adelaja D. Profiles for family planning and reproductive health programs: 116 countries. 2nd ed. Glastonbury, CT: Futures Group; 2005. Available from: http://www.policyproject.com/pubs/generalreport/Profiles116FP2ed.pdf
11. Bertrand JT, Rice J, Sullivan TM, Shelton J. Skewed method mix: a measure of quality in family planning programs. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina; 2000. Available from: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/wp-00-23/at-download/document
12. Jacobstein R, Stanley H. Contraceptive implants: providing better choice to meet growing family planning demand. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):11-17.
13. PATH. SayanaH Press: pilot introduction and evaluation. Seattle, WA: PATH; 2013. Available from: http://www.path.org/publications/files/RH-sayana-press-summary.pdf
14. Karim AM, Bieze B, Chimnani J. Measuring family planning logistics system performance in developing countries: working paper. Arlington, VA.: USAID | DELIVER PROJECT, Task Order 1; 2008. Available from: http://deliver.jsi.com/dlvr-content/resources/allpubs/policypapers/MeasFPLogiSyst-WP.pdf