Effects of eye artifact removal methods on single trial P300 detection, a comparative study

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 221, Issue , 2014, Pages 41-47

  Ghaderi, Foad ^a,b   Kim, Su Kyoung ^a,b   Kirchner, Elsa Andrea ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

ADJUST; Electroencephalogram; Eye artifact removal; Infomax; Regression; SOBI

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADJUST; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE; FILTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INFOMAX; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SECOND ORDER BLIND IDENTIFICATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADJUST; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EYE ARTIFACT REMOVAL; INFOMAX; REGRESSION; SOBI;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84885714889     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albera L., Kachenoura A., Comon P., Karfoul A., Wendling F., Senhadji L., Merlet I. ICA-based EEG denoising: a comparative analysis of fifteen methods. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences 2012, 60(3):407-418.
2. Belouchrani A., Abed-Meraim K., Cardoso J.-F., Moulines E. A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1997, 45(February (2)):434-444.
3. Berg P. Comments on EOG correction methods. Journal of Psychophysiology 1989, 3:41-44.
4. Chih-Chung C., Chih-Jen L. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2011, 2(27):1-27.
5. Croft R.J., Barry R. Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 2000, 30(1):5-19.
6. Croft R.J., Chandler J.S., Barry R.J., Cooper N.R., Clarke A.R. EOG correction: a comparison of four methods. Psychophysiology 2005, 42(1):16-24.
7. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
8. Delorme A., Sejnowski T., Makeig S. Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. NeuroImage 2007, 34(4):1443-1449.
9. Fatourechi M., Bashashati A., Ward R.K., Birch G.E. EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: a survey. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118(3):480-494.
10. Gasser T., Ziegler P., Gattaz W. The deleterious effect of ocular artefacts on the quantitative EEG, and a remedy. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 1992, 241:352-356.
11. Ghaderi F. Joint spatial and spectral filter estimation for single trial detection of event-related potentials. Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on machine learning for signal processing, MLSP 2013.
12. Gratton G. Dealing with artifacts: the EOG contamination of the event-related brain potential. Behavior Research Methods 1998, 30:44-53.
13. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1983 Apr, 55(4):468-484.
14. Halder S., Bensch M., Mellinger J., Bogdan M., Kübler A., Birbaumer N., Rosenstiel W. Online artifact removal for brain-computer interfaces using support vector machines and blind source separation. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2007 April, 8:1-8. 9.
15. He P., Wilson G., Russell C., Gerschutz M. Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG: a comparison between time-domain regression method and adaptive filtering method using simulated data. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2007, 45:495-503.
16. Hyvärinen H., Karhunen J., Oja E. Independent component analysis 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada.
17. Jansen B., Allam A., Kota P., Lachance K., Osho A., Sundaresan K. An exploratory study of factors affecting single trial P300 detection. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2004, 51(6):975-978.
18. Kachenoura A., Albera L., Senhadji L., Comon P. ICA: a potential tool for BCI systems. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2008, 25(1):57-68.
19. Kenemans J.L., Molenaar P.C., Verbaten M.N., Slangen J.L. Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domain methods with simulated and real data. Psychophysiology 1991, 28(1):114-121.
20. Kirchner E.A., Albiez J.C., Seeland A., Jordan M., Kirchner F. Towards assistive robotics for home rehabilitation. Proceedings of the international conference on biomedical electronics and devices. SciTePress 2013, 168-177.
21. Kolev V., Demiralp T., Yordanova J., Ademoglu A., Isoglu-Alka Ü. Time-frequency analysis reveals multiple functional components during oddball P300. NeuroReport 1997 May, 8(8):2061-2065.
22. Lagerlund T.D., Sharbrough F.W., Busacker N.E. Spatial filtering of multichannel electroencephalographic recordings through principal component analysis by singular value decomposition. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1997, 14:73-82.
23. Li K., Sankar R., Arbel Y., Donchin E. Single trial independent component analysis for P300 BCI system. Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBC 2009, 4035-4038.
24. Mennes M., Wouters H., Vanrumste B., Lagae L., Stiers P. Validation of ICA as a tool to remove eye movement artifacts from EEG/ERP. Psychophysiology 2010, 47(6):1142-1150.
25. Mognon A., Jovicich J., Bruzzone L., Buiatti M. ADJUST: an automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(2):229-240.
26. Naeem M., Brunner C., Leeb R., Graimann B., Pfurtscheller G. Seperability of four-class motor imagery data using independent components analysis. Journal of Neural Engineering 2006, 3(3):208.
27. Nazarpour K., Mohseni H.R., Hesse C.W., Chambers J.A., Sanei S. A novel semiblind signal extraction approach for the removal of eye-blink artifact from EEGs. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2008, 98:1-98. 12.
28. Pham T.T.H., Croft R.J., Cadusch P.J. Is ocular voltage propagation to the electroencephalogram frequency dependent?. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(5):949-956.
29. Puthusserypady S., Ratnarajah T. Robust adaptive techniques for minimization of EOG artefacts from EEG signals. Signal Processing 2006, 86(9):2351-2363.
30. Romero S., Mañanas M., Barbanoj M. Ocular reduction in EEG signals based on adaptive filtering, regression and blind source separation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2009, 37:176-191.
31. Serby H., Yom-Tov E., Inbar G. An improved P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2005, 13(1):89-98.
32. Kaufmann T., Hammer E.M.A.K. 5th international BCI conference 2011. ERPs contributing to classification in the P300 BCI. 2011, 136-139.
33. Tabie M., Kirchner E.A. EMG onset detection - comparison of different methods for a movement prediction task based on EMG. Proceedings of the international conference on bio-inspired systems and signal processing. SciTePress 2013, 242-247.
34. Wallstrom G.L., Kass R.E., Miller A., Cohn J.F., Fox N.A. Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of regression-based and component-based methods. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2004, 53(2):105-119.
35. Winkler I., Tangermanna M. Artifact-insensitivity of CSP in motor imagery BCI. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism 2011, 13(2):72-73.