Deterministic entanglement of superconducting qubits by parity measurement and feedback

Nature

Volumn 502, Issue 7471, 2013, Pages 350-354

  Riste D ^a   Dukalski, M ^a   Watson, C A ^a   De Lange, G ^a   Tiggelman, M J ^a   Blanter, Ya M ^a   Lehnert, K W ^b   Schouten, R N ^a   Dicarlo, L ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM DOT;

FEEDBACK MECHANISM; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

AMPLIFIER; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARCHITECTURE; ARTICLE; BULLOCK; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HISTOGRAM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MEASUREMENT; PARAMETRIC TEST; PARITY; PHASE TRANSITION; PHOTON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SEMICONDUCTOR; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOLID STATE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; SUPERCONDUCTOR; TIME;

EID: 84885712092     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12513     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ruskov, R. & Korotkov, A. N. Entanglement of solid-state qubits by measurement. Phys. Rev. B 67, 241305 (2003).
2. Kerckhoff, J., Bouten, L., Silberfarb, A. & Mabuchi, H. Physicalmodel of continuous two-qubit parity measurement in a cavity-QED network. Phys. Rev. A 79, 024305 (2009).
3. Engel, H.-A. & Loss, D. Fermionic Bell-state analyzer for spin qubits. Science 309, 586-588 (2005).
4. Trauzettel, B., Jordan, A. N., Beenakker, C. W. J. & Büttiker, M. Parity meter for charge qubits: an efficient quantum entangler. Phys. Rev. B 73, 235331 (2006).
5. Ionicioiu, R. Entangling spins by measuring charge: a parity-gate toolbox. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032339 (2007).
6. Williams, N. S. & Jordan, A. N. Entanglement genesis under continuous parity measurement. Phys. Rev. A 78, 062322 (2008).
7. Haack, G., Förster, H. & Büttiker, M. Parity detection and entanglement with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Phys. Rev. B 82, 155303 (2010).
8. Lalumière, K., Gambetta, J. M. & Blais, A. Tunable joint measurements in the dispersive regime of cavity QED. Phys. Rev. A 81, 040301 (2010).
9. Tornberg, L. & Johansson, G. High-fidelity feedback-assisted parity measurement in circuit QED. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012329 (2010).
10. Blais, A., Huang, R.-S., Wallraff, A., Girvin, S. M. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: an architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004).
11. Paik, H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011).
12. Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Irwin, K. D., Hilton, G. C., Vale, L. R. & Lehnert, K. W. Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial. Nature Phys. 4, 929-931 (2008).
13. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
14. Ahn, C., Doherty, A. C. & Landahl, A. J. Continuous quantum error correction via quantum feedback control. Phys. Rev. A 65, 042301 (2002).
15. Devoret, M. H. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science 339, 1169-1174 (2013).
16. Hatridge, M. et al. Quantum back-action of an individual variable-strength measurement. Science 339, 178-181 (2013).
17. Murch, K. W., Weber, S. J., Macklin, C. & Siddiqi, I. Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting qubit. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1305.7270 (2013).
18. Guerlin, C. et al. Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting. Nature 448, 889-893 (2007).
19. Beenakker, C. W. J., DiVincenzo, D. P., Emary, C. & Kindermann, M. Charge detection enables free-electron quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020501 (2004).
20. Pfaff, W. et al. Demonstration of entanglement-by-measurement of solid-state qubits. Nature Phys. 9, 29-33 (2013).
21. Hutchison, C. L., Gambetta, J. M., Blais, A. & Wilhelm, F. K. Quantum trajectory equation for multiple qubits in circuit QED: generating entanglement by measurement. Can. J. Phys. 87, 225-231 (2009).
22. Filipp, S. et al. Two-qubit state tomography using a joint dispersive readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 200402 (2009).
23. Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865-942 (2009).
24. Sarovar, M., Goan, H.-S., Spiller, T. P. & Milburn, G. J. High-fidelity measurement and quantum feedback control in circuit QED. Phys. Rev. A 72, 062327 (2005).
25. Ristè, D., Bultink, C. C., Lehnert, K. W. & DiCarlo, L. Feedback control of a solid-state qubit using high-fidelity projective measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240502 (2012).
26. Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science 282, 706-709 (1998).
27. Barrett, M. D. et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation of atomic qubits. Nature 429, 737-739 (2004).
28. Riebe, M. et al. Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms. Nature 429, 734-737 (2004).
29. Sherson, J. F. et al. Quantum teleportation between light and matter. Nature 443, 557-560 (2006).
30. Frisk Kockum, A., Tornberg, L. & Johansson, G. Undoing measurement-induced dephasing in circuit QED. Phys. Rev. A 85, 052318 (2012).
31. Ristè, D., van Leeuwen, J. G., Ku, H.-S., Lehnert, K. W. & DiCarlo, L. Initialization by measurement of a superconducting quantum bit circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050507 (2012).
32. Gambetta, J. et al. Quantum trajectory approach to circuit QED: quantum jumps and the Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. A 77, 012112 (2008).
33. Gambetta, J. et al. Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: measurement induced dephasing and number splitting. Phys. Rev. A 74, 042318 (2006).
34. Houck, A. A. et al. Controlling the spontaneous emission of a superconducting transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080502 (2008).
35. Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
36. Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J.M., Rebentrost, P. & Wilhelm, F. K. Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110501 (2009).