Electrophysiological markers of biological motion and human form recognition

NeuroImage

Volumn 84, Issue , 2014, Pages 854-867

  White, Nicole C ^a,b   Fawcett, Jonathan M ^a,c   Newman, Aaron J ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SCALP; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885693088     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.026     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bates D.M. Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 2005, 5:27-30.
2. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes 2013.
3. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Response 2002, 34:149-159.
4. Beintema J.A., Lappe M. Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:5661-5663.
5. Beintema J.A., Georg K., Lappe M. Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 2006, 68:613-624.
6. Benjamini Y., Krieger A.M., Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 2006, 93:491-507.
7. Bertenthal B.I., Pinto J. Global processing of biological motions. Psychol. Sci. 1994, 5:221-224.
8. Blake R., Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:47-73.
9. Bonda E., Petrides M., Ostry D., Evans A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:3737-3744.
10. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
11. Cutting J.E., Moore C., Morrison R. Masking the motions of human gait. Percept. Psychophys. 1988, 44:339-347.
12. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
13. Dixon P. Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. J. Mem. Lang. 2008, 59:447-456.
14. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001, 293:2470-2473.
15. Ferri S., Kolster H., Jastorff J., Orban G.a The overlap of the EBA and the MT/V5 cluster. NeuroImage 2013, 66:412-425.
16. Garcia J.O., Grossman E.D. Necessary but not sufficient: motion perception is required for perceiving biological motion. Vis. Res. 2008, 48:1144-1149.
17. Groppe D.M., Urbach T.P., Kutas M. Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:1711-1725.
18. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 2002, 35:1167-1175.
19. Grossman E., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., Blake R. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:711-720.
20. Hirai M., Hiraki K. The relative importance of spatial versus temporal structure in the perception of biological motion: an event-related potential study. Cognition 2006, 99:B15-B29.
21. Hirai M., Fukushima H., Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 344:41-44.
22. Hirai M., Senju A., Fukushima H., Hiraki K. Active processing of biological motion perception: an ERP study. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 23:387-396.
23. Jastorff J., Orban G.A. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals separation and integration of shape and motion cues in biological motion processing. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:7315-7329.
24. Jastorff J., Kourtzi Z., Giese M.A. Visual learning shapes the processing of complex movement stimuli in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:14026-14038.
25. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 1973, 14:201-211.
26. Jokisch D., Daum I., Suchan B., Troje N.F. Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, 157:195-204.
27. Jung T.P., Makeig S., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Courchesne E., Sejnowski T.J. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:1745-1758.
28. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:48-55.
29. Krakowski A.I., Ross L.A., Snyder A.C., Sehatpour P., Kelly S.P., Foxe J.J. The neurophysiology of human biological motion processing: a high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage 2011, 56:373-383.
30. Lange J., Lappe M. A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:2894-2906.
31. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-related Potential Technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge MA US.
32. Matheson H.E., Mcmullen P.A. Neuropsychological dissociations between motion and form perception suggest functional organization in extrastriate cortical regions in the human brain. Brain Cogn. 2010, 74:160-168.
33. Michels L., Lappe M., Vaina L.M. Visual areas involved in the perception of human movement from dynamic form analysis. NeuroReport 2005, 16:1037-1041.
34. Minnebusch D.A., Suchan B., Daum I. Losing your head: behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:865-874.
35. Peelen M.V., Wiggett A.J., Downing P.E. Patterns of fMRI activity dissociate overlapping functional brain areas that respond to biological motion. Neuron 2006, 49:815-822.
36. Pelli D.G. The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:437-442.
37. R.Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
38. Saygin A.P. Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 2007, 130:2452-2461.
39. Servos P., Osu R., Santi A., Kawato M. The neural substrates of biological motion perception: an fMRI study. Perception 2002, 12:772-782.
40. Stekelenburg J.J., De Gelder B. The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: an ERP study on the body-inversion effect. Cogn. Neurosci. Neuropsychol. 2004, 15:9-12.
41. Thierry G., Pegna A.J., Dodds C., Roberts M., Basan S., Downing P. An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. NeuroImage 2006, 32:871-879.
42. Troje N.F., Westhoff C. The inversion effect in biological motion perception: evidence for a "life detector"?. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:821-824.
43. Vaina L.M., Gross C.G. Perceptual deficits in patients with impaired recognition of biological motion after temporal lobe lesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101:16947-16951.
44. Vaina L.M., Lemay M., Bienfang D.C., Choi A.Y., Nakayama K. Intact biological motion and structure from motion perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case study. Vis. Neurosci. 1990, 5:353-369.
45. Vaina L.M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., Belliveau J.W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:11656-11661.
46. Vanrie J., Verfaillie K. Perception of biological motion: a stimulus set of human point-light actions. Behav. Res. Methods 2004, 36:625-629.