Mixed-signal template-based reduction scheme for stimulus artifact removal in electrical stimulation

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 449-458

  Nguyen, Thi Kim Thoa ^a,b   Musa, Silke ^a   Eberle, Wolfgang ^a   Bartic, Carmen ^a,c   Gielen, Georges ^a,b  

^a IMEC   (Belgium)

^b Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Artifact reduction; Biomedical engineering; Electrical stimulation; System analysis and design; Template subtraction

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL DETECTION; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT MODELS; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; NEURONAL ACTIVITIES; NEURONAL CIRCUITRIES; SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN; TEMPLATE SUBTRACTION;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELL CULTURE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; TOPOLOGY;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CELL CULTURE; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART MUSCLE CELL; HEART MUSCLE POTENTIAL; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; HEART MUSCLE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RAT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELLS, CULTURED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MYOCARDIUM; RATS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84885675950     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-1013-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andersen VO, Buchthal F (1970) Low noise alternating current amplifier and compensator to reduce stimulus artefact. Med Biol Eng Comput 8:501-508
2. Bernabid A, Pollak P, Gao D, HOffmann D, Limousin P, Gay E, Payen I, Benazzouz A (1996) Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis inter-medius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorder. J Neurosurg 84(2):203-214
3. Blum R, Ross J, Brown E, DeWeerth S (2007) An integrated system for simultaneous, multichannel neuronal stimulation and recording. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Reg Papers 54(12):2608-2618. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2007.906071
4. Brown E, Ross J, Blum R, Nam Y, Wheeler B, DeWeerth S (2008) Stimulus-artifact elimination in a multi-electrode system. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 2(1):10-21. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2008.918285
5. Brug GJ, Eeden ALGVD, Sluyters-Rehbach M, Sluyters JH (1984) The analysis of electrode impedances complicated by the presence of a constant phase element. J Electroanal Chem 176:275-295
6. Ferris CD, Stewart LR (1974) Electrode-produced signal distortion in electrophysiological recording systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-21(4):318-326 doi: 10.1109/TBME.1974.324319
7. Fuentes R, Petersson P, Siesser WB, Caron MG, Nicolelis MAL (2009) Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of parkinson's disease. Science 323(5921):1578-1582
8. Gnadt J, Echols S, Yildirim A, Zhang H, Paul K (2003) Spectral cancellation of microstimulation artifact for simultaneous neural recording in situ. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50(10):1129-1135 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.816077
9. Hashimoto T, Elder CM, Okun MS, Patrick SK, Vitek JL (2003) Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus changes the firing pattern of pallidal neurons. J Neurosci 23:1916-1923
10. Hashimoto T, Elder CM, Vitek JL (2002) A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 113:181-186
11. Heffer LF, Fallon JB (2008) A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 170:277-284
12. Hua Y, Lovely DF, Doraiswami R (2006) Factors affecting the stimulus artifact tail in surface-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:226-241
13. Martin M, Lasia A (2011) Influence of experimental factors on the constant phase element behavior of pt electrodes. Electrochim Acta 56:8058-8068
14. Murmann B Adc performance survey 1997-2012. http://www.stanford.edu/ murmann/adcsurvey.html
15. Musa S (2011) Design, fabrication, and characterization of a neural probe for deep brain stimulation and recording. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
16. Nguyen T, Braeken D, Musa S, Krylychkina O, Bartic C, Gielen G, Eberle W (2010) Towards a closed-loop system for stimulation and recording: an invitro approach with embryonic cardiomyocytes. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2010), pp 2735-2738
17. Nguyen T, Eberle W, Musa S, Bartic C (2008) A hybrid stimulation artifact reduction scheme for microfabricated deep brain stimulation and recording probes. In: 13th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society
18. NI-Developer-Zone (2010) Tutorials - timing and synchronization features of ni-daqmx http://www.ni.com/white-paper/4322/en
19. Parsa V, Parker P, Scott R (1998) Convergence characteristics of two algorithms in non-linear stimulus artefact cancellation for electrically evoked potential enhancement. Med Biol Eng Comput 36:202-214
20. Rosin B, Slovik M, Mitelman R, Rivlin-Etzion M, Haber SN, Israel Z, Vaadia E, Bergman H (2011) Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is superior in ameliorating parkinsonism. Neuron 72:370-384
21. Venkatraman S, Elkabany K, Long JD, Yao Y, Carmena JM (2009) A system for neural recordings and closed-loop intracortical microstimulation in awake rodents. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:15-22
22. Wagenaar DA, Pine J, Potter SM (2004) Effective parameters for stimulation of dissociated cultures using multi-electrode arrays. J Neurosci Methods 138:27-37
23. Wagenaar DA, Potter SM (2002) Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting. J Neurosci Methods 120:113-120
24. Wichmann T (2000) A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments. J Neurosci Methods 98:57-62