Aligning words using matrix factorisation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 502-509

  Goutte, Cyril ^a   Yamada, Kenji ^a   Gaussier, Eric ^a  

^a XEROX RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

ALIGNMENT DATA; BILINGUALS; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; ORTHOGONALITY; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; TERMINOLOGY EXTRACTION; WORD ALIGNMENT;

TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 84885636860     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. H. Akaike. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Tr. Automatic Control, 19(6):716–723.
2. A.-M. Barbu. 2004. Simple linguistic methods for improving a word alignment algorithm. In Le poids des mots — Proc. JADT04, pages 88–98.
3. P. F. Brown, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, and R. L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational linguistics, 19:263–312.
4. H. Dejean, E. Gaussier, C. Goutte, and K. Yamada. 2003. Reducing parameter space for word alignment. In HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop: Building and Using Parallel Texts, pages 23–26.
5. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1–38.
6. T. Hofmann. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 289–296.
7. P. Koehn, F. Och, and D. Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In Proc. HLT-NAACL 2003.
8. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung. 1999. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401:788–791.
9. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung. 2001. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In NIPS*13, pages 556–562.
10. R. Mihalcea and T. Pedersen. 2003. An evaluation exercise for word alignment. In HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop: Building and Using Parallel Texts, pages 1–10.
11. F. Och and H. Ney. 2000. A comparison of alignment models for statistical machine translation. In Proc. COLING’00, pages 1086–1090.
12. F. Och, C. Tillmann, and H. Ney. 1999. Improved alignment models for statistical machine translation. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 20–28.
13. K. Rose, E. Gurewitz, and G. Fox. 1990. A deterministic annealing approach to clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters, 11(11):589–594.
14. G. Schwartz. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461–464.
15. M. Simard and P. Langlais. 2003. Statistical translation alignment with compositionality constraints. In HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop: Building and Using Parallel Texts, pages 19–22.
16. C. Tillmann and F. Xia. 2003. A phrase-based uni-gram model for statistical machine translation. In Proc. HLT-NAACL 2003.
17. D. Yarowsky, G. Ngai, and R. Wicentowski. 2001. Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora. In Proc. HLT 2001.